Planning Commission Meeting
Transcript
| Fast, so we will all right now. | 00:00:00 | |
| Are you guys ready? | 00:00:03 | |
| OK. | 00:00:05 | |
| I'm going to call to order the July meeting of the Planning Commission. | 00:00:07 | |
| Our first item of business is approval of the minutes from our last month's meeting. | 00:00:12 | |
| Are there edits or additions that need to be made? | 00:00:17 | |
| No, All right. Do we have a motion on approval? | 00:00:23 | |
| Move to approve. Do we have a 2nd I'll second? | 00:00:27 | |
| OK, all those in favour, aye. | 00:00:30 | |
| All right, minutes have been approved. | 00:00:32 | |
| Our next item is approval on the agenda and we do have two changes to the agenda. | 00:00:35 | |
| So this will. | 00:00:42 | |
| Shorten our evening slightly. | 00:00:43 | |
| So item number 7 and item number 8. | 00:00:46 | |
| Have both been withdrawn. | 00:00:49 | |
| So a little shorter of an agenda. | 00:00:52 | |
| Any other additions or edits that? | 00:00:56 | |
| Anyone has for the agenda? | 00:00:59 | |
| All right. Do we have a motion to approve the amended agenda? | 00:01:01 | |
| All right, second, second. | 00:01:05 | |
| All right, all those in favor. | 00:01:08 | |
| All right, we have no old business. | 00:01:10 | |
| So I think we can start right in. | 00:01:14 | |
| New business. | 00:01:16 | |
| So this is tax parcel. | 00:01:18 | |
| 135O37-E. | 00:01:23 | |
| And this is a rezoning from C2 to R5. | 00:01:25 | |
| Do we have a representative for the for the owner of the property? | 00:01:29 | |
| If you want to come forward, if there's anything you want to add or tell us about. | 00:01:33 | |
| The project. | 00:01:38 | |
| If you. Yeah. | 00:01:40 | |
| And if you will, for all anyone who's giving testimony, if you'll give your name and your address before you start your comments. | 00:01:42 | |
| Yeah. Hey, good afternoon, Jonathan Mcdill. | 00:01:47 | |
| 493 Harbor View, Woodbine. | 00:01:55 | |
| It's a little back up a little bit. | 00:01:57 | |
| Um, I'm representing Greg Disbrow on this project. He's the owner of the property. | 00:02:02 | |
| And he's looking to. | 00:02:06 | |
| Rezone the C2 to R5. | 00:02:09 | |
| And here to answer any questions that you may have. | 00:02:12 | |
| I don't know if you want to. | 00:02:15 | |
| If you want me to kind of run through it or if that was OK. | 00:02:17 | |
| So this is off of proposed. | 00:02:21 | |
| Extension of Linda St. | 00:02:24 | |
| That has not happened yet and I think there's some coordination between the two property owners. | 00:02:26 | |
| Umm, to get that done. So this is. | 00:02:31 | |
| That is a part of this. | 00:02:35 | |
| But you can see the property to the West right there. Yep, right behind. | 00:02:38 | |
| What used to be Church's Chicken? Is it fitness? | 00:02:43 | |
| LA Fitness or something? | 00:02:46 | |
| So that property there and then. | 00:02:49 | |
| I believe we had. | 00:02:52 | |
| 12. | 00:02:54 | |
| Units. What was it, 16? | 00:02:58 | |
| We went back and forth a few times. So off the top medical. | 00:03:00 | |
| 1919. | 00:03:05 | |
| With a common space so. | 00:03:07 | |
| I believe we've met. | 00:03:10 | |
| The open space requirements and all that, and I think the R5 gives us the. | 00:03:12 | |
| Density and without. | 00:03:16 | |
| Too many concessions. | 00:03:18 | |
| Try to put a, you know, pretty. | 00:03:20 | |
| Clear Landscape plan on how we're going to meet the tree canopy requirements, how it could be met. | 00:03:23 | |
| So everything. | 00:03:28 | |
| Drains towards the marsh. | 00:03:30 | |
| So drainage should not be any issue once we get the construction plans. | 00:03:33 | |
| On this one. | 00:03:38 | |
| OK, OK, great. | 00:03:41 | |
| And Jamie, I'll turn things over to you for the cities. | 00:03:44 | |
| Presentation Great Thank you, Commissioners and members of the public. | 00:03:47 | |
| Watching and here in person. | 00:03:53 | |
| Before you this evening is. | 00:03:56 | |
| Sorry, I got a lot of papers here. | 00:04:00 | |
| Simple rezoning application of tax parcel ID 135037-E. | 00:04:05 | |
| Mr. Gregory this Brown requests a rezoning of that tax parcel from C2 to R5. | 00:04:11 | |
| So what we're seeing now and what Mr. Macdill just spoke through. | 00:04:18 | |
| The parcel that you're seeing highlighted here, the upland area, is shaded. | 00:04:22 | |
| In red. | 00:04:28 | |
| Um, and. | 00:04:29 | |
| The marsh or what we call kind of conservation area is shaded in green, all part of the same parcel. This is our new ALDI, just to | 00:04:33 | |
| help everybody get situated. | 00:04:38 | |
| Mr. Macdill also referenced a little bit of a. | 00:04:44 | |
| Potentially A partnership between two property owners. | 00:04:47 | |
| Mr. Sawyer, who is in the audience with us. | 00:04:51 | |
| You'll remember brought forward a rezoning application of this parcel just to the east. | 00:04:53 | |
| That parcel fronts both along Charles St. | 00:05:00 | |
| And kind of is where the Linda St. right of way terminates. | 00:05:04 | |
| So in part of. | 00:05:10 | |
| Staff's review of the project. | 00:05:11 | |
| Of this rezoning application. | 00:05:13 | |
| Just want to be clear, this is a rezoning. | 00:05:16 | |
| The applicant has provided us with. | 00:05:19 | |
| What I'm referring to here. | 00:05:22 | |
| As a a site plan, just showing potentially how they may lay things out. | 00:05:25 | |
| The material is very close to a conceptual plaque. | 00:05:32 | |
| But with our new subdivision ordinance. | 00:05:37 | |
| This will have to come back before you. | 00:05:40 | |
| As a conceptual plat application and you'll see a little bit more detail and we'll discuss. | 00:05:43 | |
| You know, open space, amenities, buffers, all that types of stuff, but for now you're looking at the rezoning and this. | 00:05:48 | |
| Site Plan gives you a good indication for the extension. | 00:05:56 | |
| Of Linda St. and how that would then enter the uplands. | 00:06:01 | |
| And would be navigated to allow for. | 00:06:05 | |
| The Townhomes, which is the main dwelling of the R5 townhome dwelling district. | 00:06:08 | |
| OK. | 00:06:15 | |
| Reviewed this application. | 00:06:19 | |
| And we recommend approval. | 00:06:21 | |
| Part of the set of conditions. | 00:06:24 | |
| Is that all future development will adhere to the R5 standards? | 00:06:28 | |
| And that this again is a rezoning application. | 00:06:33 | |
| Which will come back before you as a conceptual plan if you choose to approve it. | 00:06:36 | |
| Because it is indeed a major subdivision, this would be, I think, upwards of 19. | 00:06:41 | |
| Individualized persons, I believe. | 00:06:47 | |
| If I recall right. | 00:06:51 | |
| All that area that it abuts to is all residential already, is that correct? Correct. Yeah, we can have a look at. | 00:06:53 | |
| At the zoning there, yeah, so. | 00:07:00 | |
| All of the area that you're seeing in yellow, so these surroundings. | 00:07:04 | |
| Didn't we just? | 00:07:10 | |
| Approved from across net and R5 Mr. Sawyers property, yeah. | 00:07:12 | |
| Right next to it, right next across the street. | 00:07:19 | |
| All right. Are there any other questions from Commission members before we open this up for public comment? | 00:07:25 | |
| All right, seeing none, I'm going to go ahead and open a public comment on this item. So if you care to give public comment on | 00:07:35 | |
| this item, if you would come forward, give your name and address and then anything you'd like to add to the record on this item. | 00:07:42 | |
| All right. I'm not seeing any movement, so I'm going to go ahead and close the public comment period on this. | 00:07:51 | |
| Any further discussion amongst? | 00:07:59 | |
| Commission members, do we, are we ready for a motion on this item? | 00:08:02 | |
| All right, well, I might make a comment here just and I'm I'm not sure that. | 00:08:07 | |
| I have any real opposition, it seems like an awkward. | 00:08:12 | |
| Location for a higher density residential. | 00:08:16 | |
| Development. | 00:08:19 | |
| Being right behind the. | 00:08:20 | |
| Commercial zoning, that's now the Aldi's out there. I mean, it would be a logical extension from. | 00:08:22 | |
| That site if it had common ownership. | 00:08:27 | |
| But being. | 00:08:30 | |
| I guess. | 00:08:32 | |
| At least two streets off of. | 00:08:34 | |
| Spur 40. | 00:08:36 | |
| It just without any other higher density residential around except. | 00:08:37 | |
| For the. | 00:08:42 | |
| Site across the street that he just referenced. It seems awkward. | 00:08:42 | |
| It just it just seems like there'd be a better location for a high density residential. | 00:08:50 | |
| Site then. | 00:08:55 | |
| Behind the shopping center. | 00:08:57 | |
| Just an opinion. | 00:09:00 | |
| And I think we talked with the. | 00:09:05 | |
| Mr. Sawyer's proposal on this. | 00:09:07 | |
| About. | 00:09:10 | |
| Access umm. | 00:09:11 | |
| On the pathway. | 00:09:13 | |
| So I mean there, there may be some. | 00:09:14 | |
| Plus. | 00:09:17 | |
| For. | 00:09:18 | |
| Walkable access to. | 00:09:20 | |
| The amenities that. | 00:09:22 | |
| Are in that Plaza. | 00:09:24 | |
| If I remember correctly when we did it. | 00:09:27 | |
| Approve the previous one. | 00:09:29 | |
| Isn't fairly heavily. | 00:09:31 | |
| Wooded between. | 00:09:32 | |
| Now it's all these. | 00:09:35 | |
| And where this would be? | 00:09:36 | |
| At the point where you can't. | 00:09:39 | |
| Can you even see the back of the ALDI location? | 00:09:41 | |
| I remember sitting in a car and I don't think you can. | 00:09:45 | |
| But maybe I'm maybe I'm wrong on my memory. | 00:09:48 | |
| I'm not hearing you. What? Well. | 00:09:51 | |
| When we approved the one previously that you spoke of? | 00:09:55 | |
| I think I remember driving back in there. | 00:09:59 | |
| And when you end up in the end of the street where this would be. | 00:10:02 | |
| You can't even see all these because the vegetation is so strong. | 00:10:06 | |
| I don't know if that would be torn down or if it would remain there. | 00:10:10 | |
| I believe this is further down from where all these, but no, I'm kind of answering what Matt? | 00:10:15 | |
| This question was I don't, I think it's. | 00:10:20 | |
| Blacked off from a. | 00:10:23 | |
| From at least a view standpoint. | 00:10:25 | |
| By a fairly heavy vegetation. | 00:10:29 | |
| Now whether that would stand or not, I don't know if that's. | 00:10:31 | |
| The plan is to tear it down. | 00:10:34 | |
| I don't know why you'd want to, because then you'd be looking at the back of a shopping center. | 00:10:36 | |
| So I think it's it's important to look at the map as shown now can show you some of the existing conditions on the site. I don't | 00:10:41 | |
| know why that pops up right there, but. | 00:10:46 | |
| Here's where the parcel, the subject parcel. | 00:10:52 | |
| Abuts the other commercial parcels and so I do think that. | 00:10:55 | |
| When we see the conceptual plat. | 00:11:00 | |
| We do have buffer requirements. | 00:11:02 | |
| And so there's there's an indication. | 00:11:05 | |
| In this site plan of potential buffering between. | 00:11:09 | |
| The existing commercial development and the proposed. | 00:11:15 | |
| Housing. | 00:11:19 | |
| And that is something that you would see if this were to move forward. | 00:11:20 | |
| But just as you see now. | 00:11:24 | |
| There's really not. You can, you can kind of see right through there. That's why I couldn't determine where I was, where I was | 00:11:27 | |
| previously, yeah. | 00:11:31 | |
| You were over here, although as as it is now commercial. | 00:11:36 | |
| It has very low visibility to Hwy. 40. It's sort of stuck way in the back there and wouldn't be a prime commercial site because | 00:11:41 | |
| you wouldn't see what was there easily. | 00:11:47 | |
| On Hwy. On Hwy. 40. | 00:11:53 | |
| Coming east. | 00:11:57 | |
| You would notice it. | 00:12:00 | |
| Before we started on the curve. | 00:12:02 | |
| Crossing the Creek. | 00:12:04 | |
| So while you're saying the viewshed traveling this way, you would. | 00:12:08 | |
| Well, the trees would obviously have to be removed to develop the site. You should have both. | 00:12:14 | |
| Yeah, talking about that. | 00:12:19 | |
| RJ Dark side of a red clay site. | 00:12:22 | |
| That's part of it. | 00:12:26 | |
| Or male with is marsh. | 00:12:27 | |
| Trees and male I was over in. | 00:12:31 | |
| What's the move the arrow just a little bit toward Aldi's? | 00:12:36 | |
| Yeah, not not that far. | 00:12:40 | |
| The first square there. | 00:12:43 | |
| The first square there. | 00:12:45 | |
| This one here no come back. This one here, come down right there building. | 00:12:47 | |
| Is that the fitness center? I believe so, yeah. This is the tobacco palace or something. | 00:12:55 | |
| So easy access to exercise and cigarettes. | 00:13:03 | |
| Yeah, perfect. | 00:13:06 | |
| I mean as we, as we did negotiate with Mr. Sawyer, I mean I think a footpath but also a buffer sort of area and landscape that | 00:13:08 | |
| would provide. | 00:13:13 | |
| Both noise attenuation, privacy, security, beautification. | 00:13:17 | |
| But also access I think could be. | 00:13:22 | |
| But he's still got to come back for what? A concessional plan? | 00:13:25 | |
| All right, move to approve based on the. | 00:13:30 | |
| Presentation made and the suggestions from. | 00:13:33 | |
| OK. You folks, do we have a second for that? | 00:13:38 | |
| What would you want to repeat that? | 00:13:42 | |
| Move to approve. | 00:13:45 | |
| Based on. | 00:13:47 | |
| The government from staff, correct? | 00:13:49 | |
| All those in favor, aye. | 00:13:53 | |
| All right, now we have. | 00:13:56 | |
| Five additional. | 00:14:01 | |
| Items that are all related. | 00:14:03 | |
| So we will be taking as the Planning Commission because we have. | 00:14:06 | |
| Five different items that need to have action. | 00:14:10 | |
| Will be separately taking action, but I think we can discuss these as one. | 00:14:13 | |
| Project and then at the conclusion of that so. | 00:14:19 | |
| What's proposed is for rezoning. | 00:14:23 | |
| Actions and then one conceptual plan on that. | 00:14:26 | |
| Do we have a representative from the project if you want to? | 00:14:31 | |
| Come forward, I believe you have a presentation you want to share. | 00:14:34 | |
| And if you'll give your name and address? Yes, thank you. Jeff White, 226 Woodsong Lane in Saint Augustine. | 00:14:39 | |
| I am a representative from Ryan Holmes. | 00:14:47 | |
| And. | 00:14:50 | |
| Thank you. That's. | 00:15:03 | |
| A little less invasive than my dentist. That's not as good. | 00:15:05 | |
| Is that better? | 00:15:11 | |
| That OK, That's a little bit OK. Thank you. | 00:15:12 | |
| I'm hearing impaired. I'll let you know. Thank you. | 00:15:15 | |
| I am here as a representative of Ryan Holmes. | 00:15:19 | |
| Which is our marketing name for NVR Incorporated. | 00:15:23 | |
| We are a national home builder and we're very interested and we love your city. | 00:15:27 | |
| We are here today to talk about Oscar Oaks is what we are calling this property. It's four separate parcels. | 00:15:35 | |
| Totaling 162. | 00:15:42 | |
| And a half acres. | 00:15:45 | |
| The subject property is located on the east side of Saint Mary's Rd. north of Hwy. 40. | 00:15:48 | |
| We are asking for rezoning of each of the four parcels. | 00:15:53 | |
| In order to construct a community consisting of 179. | 00:15:57 | |
| 50 foot lots. | 00:16:01 | |
| And 100 and 4632 foot. | 00:16:03 | |
| Lots that will contain duplexes. | 00:16:06 | |
| The community will include amenities. | 00:16:09 | |
| Like a pool, clubhouse and a playground. | 00:16:12 | |
| It will also include interconnectivity. | 00:16:16 | |
| With golf cart, biking and walking paths. | 00:16:19 | |
| And we have tried to design this to minimize wetland impact and preserve as much. | 00:16:22 | |
| Wooded area as possible. | 00:16:27 | |
| A little history about our company. 1 next one, Jamie. | 00:16:30 | |
| We were started in 1948. | 00:16:37 | |
| We operate in 15 states. We are. | 00:16:39 | |
| Currently the 4th largest home builder. | 00:16:44 | |
| In the country. | 00:16:46 | |
| And. | 00:16:48 | |
| We I only say that is that we have a reputation uphold. | 00:16:49 | |
| And we are not interested. | 00:16:55 | |
| A fly by night operation. We want to do business with the City of Saint Mary's. | 00:16:58 | |
| And have a relationship going forward. | 00:17:03 | |
| And have a community that. | 00:17:06 | |
| Not only us, but the city can be proud of. | 00:17:08 | |
| Next please. | 00:17:11 | |
| Going out even through 2008, through the Great Depression, we were one of the few home builders who. | 00:17:13 | |
| State not just stayed afloat, but was profitable. | 00:17:20 | |
| And we grew in market share and and I think that was a testament to our. | 00:17:23 | |
| Product and our discipline and what we try to bring to the table to bring a good quality product to everybody. | 00:17:28 | |
| Next please. | 00:17:35 | |
| Here is our current site plan that we are showing what we'd like to build. | 00:17:37 | |
| The white areas are the homes. | 00:17:43 | |
| The dark green areas are wooded areas. | 00:17:45 | |
| We've also considered in there showing our ponds. | 00:17:50 | |
| For proper retention. | 00:17:53 | |
| And the light green areas is where we could potentially have open. | 00:17:55 | |
| Recreation or park space? | 00:18:00 | |
| But we would need further approvals. | 00:18:03 | |
| For wetland impacts and things from FEMA, so we don't know for sure, but it is. It is, but could potentially be done. Either way, | 00:18:05 | |
| there will not be a home built on those areas. | 00:18:10 | |
| Access would be off the Mickel road right away. Alignment. | 00:18:14 | |
| We would not. | 00:18:18 | |
| Affect any of the existing drainage easements. | 00:18:20 | |
| And but we would also need to know that we would need not just FEMA approval, but also G dot approval. | 00:18:23 | |
| For our access, but this is conceptually what we would be looking at. | 00:18:30 | |
| Next, to give you an idea, this next one, this is one of our existing communities and this would be. | 00:18:34 | |
| Fairly similar to kind of what we. | 00:18:40 | |
| What our philosophy is. | 00:18:42 | |
| We do have. | 00:18:44 | |
| And this one is a local. It's a. | 00:18:46 | |
| Jacksonville Project. As you can see, we tried to do our best to preserve as much wooded area, even between the ponds. | 00:18:49 | |
| Preserve the wooded areas as much as possible. We know that brings a lot to the community. | 00:18:56 | |
| And quite frankly, it helps us in in selling the homes, which is what our goal is here so. | 00:19:02 | |
| I think we have kind of the same alignment in goals and what we want to try and do. | 00:19:08 | |
| The next slide. | 00:19:13 | |
| Shows what we would perceive to be the right of way within the community, within the neighborhood. | 00:19:15 | |
| To help give us, you know, the interconnectivity. | 00:19:21 | |
| We would provide a bike or golf cart path. | 00:19:25 | |
| Separate from a pedestrian walkway, there would also be St. landscaping. | 00:19:29 | |
| That we will have in there so we. | 00:19:34 | |
| Think it will help provide that interconnectivity but also beautify the whole area. | 00:19:38 | |
| Next slide will show. | 00:19:45 | |
| Kind of our inner what each individual lot would look like and this is a typical. | 00:19:47 | |
| Landscape plan that we have. | 00:19:53 | |
| We want to make sure that we have landscaping around the foundation. | 00:19:55 | |
| Shade Trees. St. Trees. | 00:20:01 | |
| And all this will be done as part of a professionally managed homeowners association, because we want to make sure that. | 00:20:04 | |
| This community keeps up the standards and looks. | 00:20:11 | |
| The way it did when it opened. | 00:20:16 | |
| In perpetuity, long after we're gone. | 00:20:18 | |
| So it'll be professionally managed. | 00:20:20 | |
| The next slide shows. | 00:20:23 | |
| What we perceive or what we've kind of conceptually done as a landscape, as a monument, would have landscape around it at the | 00:20:26 | |
| entrance to the community. | 00:20:30 | |
| Pronouncing that to the for all the residents there. | 00:20:35 | |
| As far as the amenity goes, the next few slides show just some examples of things we've done in the past. | 00:20:40 | |
| This we haven't been able to design yet what the amenity would look like. | 00:20:47 | |
| However, this would be. | 00:20:52 | |
| What we would be considered to be the minimum? | 00:20:55 | |
| A pool that would be the appropriate size for the number of residents. | 00:20:58 | |
| A clubhouse with restrooms. | 00:21:02 | |
| And they and some shade space. Also there would be a playground which may be adjacent to the pool or it might be in another part | 00:21:04 | |
| in the community. | 00:21:08 | |
| But that would be our. | 00:21:13 | |
| Our minimum you can go to the next one. Jamie shows the same one. | 00:21:14 | |
| But we would make sure again, it's appropriately sized. | 00:21:19 | |
| For the size of the community, we don't want to have a pool that's too small for the number of residents. | 00:21:22 | |
| Next one if you don't mind. | 00:21:30 | |
| Thank you. | 00:21:32 | |
| We don't know again if the size will allow, but if possible. | 00:21:33 | |
| We know As for us as home builders. | 00:21:37 | |
| The amenities add so much to the community and it's a. | 00:21:41 | |
| It's a well made investment on our part to do as best as we can, so if it allows we would. | 00:21:44 | |
| Have things like dog parks. | 00:21:51 | |
| Pickleball courts. | 00:21:53 | |
| Maybe a bigger pool you know will have the the furniture and everything appropriate we want to make it. | 00:21:55 | |
| Attractive to potential home buyers and we feel like that's a good investment for. | 00:22:01 | |
| For us and it helps. | 00:22:05 | |
| Again, with the with the community as a whole. | 00:22:06 | |
| To give you an idea of the homes, these are some of them that we've looked at. | 00:22:10 | |
| That we would that we build here in the in the region. | 00:22:14 | |
| Here's some examples of what would be built on the 50 foot lots. They could be one or two-story. They'd be between 3:00 to 5:00 | 00:22:19 | |
| bedrooms. | 00:22:23 | |
| An average sale price would probably be in the low to mid three hundreds for for these ones. | 00:22:27 | |
| And then a couple more examples of some other ones. | 00:22:34 | |
| Same things, maybe some smaller 3 bedroom homes we feel like it applies to. | 00:22:37 | |
| Families, but also maybe folks who are downsizing. | 00:22:42 | |
| We'd have a variety of those again on the 50 foot lots. | 00:22:46 | |
| Our next product. | 00:22:51 | |
| This would be what we're we're referring to as our duplex villa. | 00:22:52 | |
| Product. This is something that is brand new that we've just created specifically for this community. | 00:22:56 | |
| So it is an attached housing. | 00:23:03 | |
| With us 24 foot eat this is 2 units, each one is 24 feet wide. | 00:23:06 | |
| That would give you an 8 on a 32 foot wide set back. | 00:23:11 | |
| That would give you 8 more feet or 16 feet between each building. | 00:23:15 | |
| So even though these are attached housing, we want people to have that would. | 00:23:20 | |
| Potentially being a price point for maybe some folks who. | 00:23:25 | |
| Could be more affordable. | 00:23:28 | |
| But would also give the feel as you're driving through down the street. | 00:23:30 | |
| It feels like you're in a single family community where it's not these giant. | 00:23:34 | |
| Clusters of buildings. | 00:23:38 | |
| Duplex. | 00:23:40 | |
| With a space in between to the next duplex and it kind of gives you that same sort of feel of being in a in a single family | 00:23:42 | |
| detached community, but providing it at a price point that would be. | 00:23:47 | |
| Affordable for some other folks. | 00:23:52 | |
| This is the existing zoning we're here to ask today for, for zoning each of the four zonings. | 00:23:56 | |
| Is well, R5 is the furthest north. | 00:24:03 | |
| And really what we're asking is for we would love and the others are all zoned commercial. | 00:24:06 | |
| And really what we're asking is that the R5 just be switched to the southern portion. | 00:24:11 | |
| And then everything else be downsized down, zoned from commercial to residential to R1. | 00:24:18 | |
| So, umm. | 00:24:24 | |
| Net across the board, we're really asking for just to relocate the R5 that's already exists there. | 00:24:26 | |
| And that it would be and to give us what we would want for. | 00:24:33 | |
| To get. | 00:24:37 | |
| The R1 zoning for what is now currently commercial. | 00:24:39 | |
| The next slide. | 00:24:44 | |
| Would show we would of how we would do that and be able to accomplish that with our proposed zoning. I know it's kind of hard to | 00:24:46 | |
| read on there. | 00:24:50 | |
| But we feel like if you look at some of the adjacent uses to this project, you know you have the sugar mill development. | 00:24:55 | |
| To the east. | 00:25:03 | |
| There is and there will be some higher proposed, some proposed higher density projects that are going to the West into the north. | 00:25:05 | |
| We feel that. | 00:25:12 | |
| This is a good transition between those and we feel like it would it would fit well in the community. | 00:25:13 | |
| And would uh, uh. | 00:25:20 | |
| Be that transition piece and and and fit well for future growth that is planned for in the community as well. | 00:25:22 | |
| So, umm. | 00:25:28 | |
| Thank you. Any questions? | 00:25:29 | |
| I think it might be helpful. | 00:25:32 | |
| I know, I looked. | 00:25:34 | |
| As I was looking over this. | 00:25:36 | |
| I had some. | 00:25:37 | |
| Question about. | 00:25:39 | |
| Traffic and the fact that there's one. | 00:25:41 | |
| Exit and entrance for that and I wondered if you could talk about the process for that. | 00:25:44 | |
| And I believe in our recommendations. | 00:25:49 | |
| There's some language about. | 00:25:52 | |
| Not only a review. | 00:25:55 | |
| Traffic, but the potential of. | 00:25:57 | |
| Needing to ask for additional. | 00:25:59 | |
| Access points, yes, thank you. We, we, we have considered that and we are. | 00:26:01 | |
| Open to that we have asked for and we will do as part of our engineering. When we get into our construction drawings, we'll have a | 00:26:07 | |
| traffic engineer who will provide those studies and will help us to understand and and know that. | 00:26:13 | |
| Where our site plan does show. | 00:26:18 | |
| If you can Scroll down slightly, Jamie. | 00:26:22 | |
| There is an emergency access coming out from the South end there that connects. That would be an emergency access we're also | 00:26:25 | |
| showing. | 00:26:29 | |
| Yep, there and then at the top there is a second access. | 00:26:34 | |
| Coming out. | 00:26:39 | |
| That was, you know, furthest to the north there, however. | 00:26:40 | |
| We're kind of reluctant on committing to anything because we have we really have to get G dots because of. | 00:26:46 | |
| Of Saint Mary's Road being under G dots. | 00:26:51 | |
| Jurisdiction, we're going to need to get their permission and we have not made that application yet. We would like to get our | 00:26:54 | |
| zoning and site plan approved. | 00:26:57 | |
| Before we get to that. | 00:27:01 | |
| Phase, but we are certainly. | 00:27:03 | |
| There's no bigger complaint about any community than traffic, and there's nothing that will kill our sales faster than traffic, so | 00:27:05 | |
| we're sensitive to that. | 00:27:09 | |
| And then the second question I have, and I know I'm holding Jamie up from the city's presentation on this, I, I wouldn't guess | 00:27:13 | |
| we're going to have questions for you. | 00:27:17 | |
| About screening. | 00:27:21 | |
| And buffer zone and so it might be helpful if you talked about that. | 00:27:23 | |
| Yeah, Yes, we, we have gone through a few iterations of this site plan and with the comments from the city, you know, we've talked | 00:27:29 | |
| about that with having minimum buffer zones and we feel like we've we've met those requirements. | 00:27:34 | |
| And it brought that in and and we understand that would be a condition. | 00:27:40 | |
| Of our final site plan approval and and we feel like we've met those. | 00:27:44 | |
| So, for instance, I think we have some folks in the room who live on the other side. | 00:27:48 | |
| Of the railroad tracks. | 00:27:54 | |
| And it might be helpful for them to understand what's proposed in that area. You bet. Maybe Can I turn some time over? Jonathan | 00:27:56 | |
| Macdill is our engineer of record with this and he can probably speak to that to maybe a little better if I can. | 00:28:02 | |
| Jonathan. | 00:28:08 | |
| Jonathan McGill, 493 Harborview. | 00:28:11 | |
| Umm, yeah. So if you you kind of, there's kind of. | 00:28:13 | |
| Broken up into two. | 00:28:17 | |
| Two sections on the development. | 00:28:19 | |
| Jeff just kind of went through. There's a residential single family. | 00:28:22 | |
| Detached and. | 00:28:25 | |
| And attached. | 00:28:27 | |
| So on the southern part of the development. | 00:28:29 | |
| Jim, if you don't mind, can you zoom in? | 00:28:32 | |
| On kind of the. | 00:28:34 | |
| Bottom uh. | 00:28:35 | |
| Up against the railroad. | 00:28:36 | |
| OK, so right here we have a 30 foot buffer. | 00:28:38 | |
| Off of the property line. | 00:28:41 | |
| Plus the railroad. | 00:28:43 | |
| So there's, it probably doesn't look like much there, but there's a good bit of space that and that that's intended to stay | 00:28:45 | |
| natural. | 00:28:48 | |
| So there's a 30 foot buffer there. | 00:28:52 | |
| That's the Titus it's they're going to get. | 00:28:55 | |
| The there's the city adopted with the new. | 00:28:57 | |
| Ordinance. | 00:29:01 | |
| A 50 foot buffer off a major Rd. | 00:29:02 | |
| So the. | 00:29:04 | |
| Part to the northwest. | 00:29:06 | |
| Is the only location right up there to the top left? | 00:29:08 | |
| So you see that strip of property between the property line of the back of those lots. | 00:29:13 | |
| That is 50 foot. | 00:29:18 | |
| And everything else. | 00:29:20 | |
| You know, South of that. | 00:29:22 | |
| Is actually better. | 00:29:24 | |
| Because of the wetlands and other things we had to work around. | 00:29:25 | |
| Umm, then if you go from the Minkler right of way north on the railroad track. | 00:29:28 | |
| There is a G dot easement. | 00:29:35 | |
| Drainage easement and I believe it's 100 foot. | 00:29:37 | |
| There's a there's a berm, there's a swell and there's a berm. | 00:29:40 | |
| Essentially they dug the swell through the dirt up and it created a berm. | 00:29:43 | |
| We're outside of the existing berm. | 00:29:48 | |
| So on the northern part from Menkler North. | 00:29:51 | |
| There's actually going to be. | 00:29:55 | |
| A natural burn that's there that will probably remain. | 00:29:57 | |
| But. | 00:30:01 | |
| It will definitely you know is intended to stay. | 00:30:02 | |
| Vegetative buffer. | 00:30:05 | |
| And we'll, we'll definitely be working with. | 00:30:07 | |
| Staff to ensure that we're meeting all the buffer requirements as we. | 00:30:09 | |
| Work through the construction plans. | 00:30:12 | |
| Great. Thank you. | 00:30:14 | |
| Jamie, I've delayed you. | 00:30:17 | |
| All right. | 00:30:29 | |
| Can you hear me? | 00:30:30 | |
| Mr. King, OK. | 00:30:31 | |
| So a couple of just to lay it all out for those who might be listening before the Commission this evening, and I think a good way | 00:30:33 | |
| to look at it. | 00:30:38 | |
| Is to go to our zoning map. | 00:30:43 | |
| There we go. | 00:30:50 | |
| So, as Mr. White and Mr. Macdill discussed. | 00:30:52 | |
| There are actually 4 parcels in discussion right now and I'm. | 00:30:56 | |
| Highlighting them now. | 00:31:01 | |
| So we talked about the interchange that gets onto Hwy. 40 off of Saint Mary's Road. | 00:31:03 | |
| And as we continue N these are the parcels. | 00:31:09 | |
| On the eastern side. | 00:31:12 | |
| So before the Commission this evening are 4 rezonings. | 00:31:14 | |
| For tax parcel 121021. | 00:31:19 | |
| The request is from C2 to R1. | 00:31:23 | |
| For tax parcel 121021B. | 00:31:27 | |
| The request is from. | 00:31:30 | |
| C2 to R5. | 00:31:32 | |
| For text Parcel 121021. | 00:31:34 | |
| The request is for C2 to R1. | 00:31:38 | |
| And for tax parcel 134029. | 00:31:41 | |
| From R5 to R1. | 00:31:44 | |
| Accompanying this rezoning application. | 00:31:47 | |
| Is a conceptual plan for a major subdivision. | 00:31:50 | |
| So this is our first. | 00:31:54 | |
| Application under our new. | 00:31:57 | |
| Subdivision Ordinance. | 00:31:59 | |
| And I want to take the time right now to thank my staff. | 00:32:01 | |
| And the development community and the Commission and the Council. | 00:32:05 | |
| For the incredibly hard work that happened to overhaul our subdivision ordinance to get us to the point where. | 00:32:09 | |
| Staff does believe that what is being proposed. | 00:32:17 | |
| Within this development. | 00:32:21 | |
| Sorry if I can get to it. | 00:32:23 | |
| Is indeed. | 00:32:25 | |
| We think. | 00:32:27 | |
| Closer to what the Commission had envisioned. | 00:32:28 | |
| Within a major subdivision application. | 00:32:33 | |
| So, you know, just to take a little bit of time here for. | 00:32:37 | |
| The public one thing that was not. | 00:32:41 | |
| Discussed, but I do want to take the time to walk through it. | 00:32:44 | |
| Is the application is applying for our residential density bonus? | 00:32:47 | |
| So one of the things that we did in our subdivision ordinance when it was rewritten. | 00:32:53 | |
| Is we made the starting point. | 00:32:57 | |
| The R1 or single family residential. | 00:33:00 | |
| Zoning, which has a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. | 00:33:04 | |
| And a lot width of 75 feet. | 00:33:09 | |
| What we did in the subdivision ordinance is we allowed. | 00:33:11 | |
| A developer to come in with. | 00:33:16 | |
| To meet a certain set of criteria, like a a Chinese menu if you will, of things that can be done in order to increase density | 00:33:19 | |
| beyond. | 00:33:25 | |
| The sort of what you could get on the lot with 75 foot wide lots at 10,000 square feet. | 00:33:30 | |
| So, as Mr. White explained. | 00:33:36 | |
| You're going to see two different lot sizes here the the duplex lot size. | 00:33:38 | |
| As well as the single family home lot size. | 00:33:43 | |
| The Commission in your packet, you have sort of a breakdown of the residential density bonus and how the applicant has gotten | 00:33:47 | |
| there. | 00:33:51 | |
| And that was a that was a tough process for us to work through because this was our first kind of application. So the engineer of | 00:33:57 | |
| record laid out what could go on the site with the. | 00:34:02 | |
| Standard R1 zoning lot sizes. | 00:34:08 | |
| And then we worked kind of in an iterative way to say, OK. | 00:34:11 | |
| We've met all of the amenity space, we've met all the open space. Now if we give more open space. | 00:34:16 | |
| We can get that density multiplier of 0.3. | 00:34:23 | |
| If we don't mitigate a significant amount of wetlands, we can get an additional density multiplier of 0.3. | 00:34:26 | |
| So if you're following my guerrilla math a little bit. | 00:34:33 | |
| As you get that multiplier, the idea is that you are able to, through additional amenities that you're offering the community, | 00:34:37 | |
| you're able to reduce your lot with and your. | 00:34:43 | |
| Overall lot size. So that's kind of how this development came to be. | 00:34:50 | |
| So to take a little bit of time to kind of address. | 00:34:54 | |
| Some of the key areas. | 00:34:58 | |
| You know if the Commission should choose to move forward and the approval of this rezoning and conceptual plan. | 00:35:01 | |
| The rezoning and the conceptual plat will move forward to council. | 00:35:09 | |
| If that is approved, the applicant will come back with a preliminary plat application. | 00:35:13 | |
| The preliminary plat will give us. | 00:35:20 | |
| A little bit more detail on the landscaping, it'll give us more detail on the amenity spaces. | 00:35:22 | |
| Staff also recommends. | 00:35:28 | |
| That if we choose to approve a condition of approval. | 00:35:30 | |
| Would be that before the preliminary plant there is a traffic study? | 00:35:34 | |
| And in addition to that, there is a letter of intent. | 00:35:41 | |
| From Georgia, dot. So those are kind of two conditions that we're putting forward. | 00:35:44 | |
| OK, let's discuss a little bit more sort of the nuts and bolts. | 00:35:50 | |
| Of the open space. | 00:35:55 | |
| In the amenity spaces. | 00:35:57 | |
| So, as Mr. White explained, one of the things that we talked quite a bit about was how you could show some connectivity within the | 00:36:03 | |
| community. So you saw the kind of key plan. | 00:36:09 | |
| Of uh. | 00:36:16 | |
| The right of way. | 00:36:17 | |
| Which will have an identified. | 00:36:19 | |
| Bicycle path or golf cart path? | 00:36:22 | |
| In addition to the vehicle path. So the proposal is for. | 00:36:25 | |
| A St. width that is about 28 feet. | 00:36:30 | |
| Typically what's required is 24 feet, so these roads will be a little bit wider. | 00:36:34 | |
| In addition to that, there will be a sidewalk. | 00:36:39 | |
| And those paths are proposed. | 00:36:42 | |
| Sorry, just give it a minute here. | 00:36:47 | |
| To kind of meander and connect. | 00:36:50 | |
| Throughout the entire development. | 00:36:52 | |
| So Mr. White can speak more to these potential paths, but you'll see. | 00:36:54 | |
| All right. For example here a path that is connecting in and around and going back to the sidewalks. So really giving an | 00:37:00 | |
| opportunity both. | 00:37:05 | |
| Road and off road. | 00:37:11 | |
| As we discussed. | 00:37:14 | |
| The new subdivision ordinance requires A50 foot set back. | 00:37:16 | |
| Off of the OR a development buffer off of major roadway like Saint Mary's Road, so. | 00:37:20 | |
| Essentially from the street. | 00:37:27 | |
| You won't really be seeing. | 00:37:29 | |
| The residential development other than the sign. | 00:37:31 | |
| As was also discussed. | 00:37:35 | |
| The subdivision ordinance does require. | 00:37:37 | |
| A minimum of a 25 foot buffer, kind of around the edges of the development. | 00:37:39 | |
| And. | 00:37:46 | |
| It can be further detailed. | 00:37:48 | |
| With the preliminary plat application. | 00:37:50 | |
| As we're seeing here. | 00:37:53 | |
| If this is the identified property line, this kind of darker boulder line, there is a 30 foot set back. There's a path that is | 00:37:56 | |
| here but also. | 00:38:01 | |
| To the east of the property is the rail railroad. | 00:38:06 | |
| In that easement as well. | 00:38:10 | |
| So I think this will be a well buffered site. | 00:38:12 | |
| Staff has reviewed. We spent an extensive amount of time working on this application and reviewing it with the applicant. | 00:38:16 | |
| We do recommend approval. | 00:38:23 | |
| With those conditions that we put forward. | 00:38:25 | |
| Requiring a traffic study. | 00:38:28 | |
| Conducted preliminary prior to the preliminary plat application. | 00:38:31 | |
| Bringing forward a more detailed landscape plan as part of the preliminary plan. | 00:38:36 | |
| More detail on the potential amenity spaces. | 00:38:40 | |
| And again, outreach to Georgia dot about those access points. | 00:38:43 | |
| I have a question are we going to address. | 00:38:49 | |
| First the rezoning and then are we going to have another discussion on the proposed? | 00:38:51 | |
| So I think it meant I think the best. | 00:38:59 | |
| Because I have a lot of questions about the proposed development. | 00:39:02 | |
| That and I don't I thought it might be better to bring it up later on when we get down to that. What I suggested was that we. | 00:39:05 | |
| As far as? | 00:39:13 | |
| Commission and the public on the comment period. | 00:39:14 | |
| Cover all of it and then we'll take separate action for each one of these. But I mean are we doing all 5 including the we are so | 00:39:18 | |
| the subdivision application too. So we should bring our questions up now, okay. | 00:39:25 | |
| And that I think that will also help the public on the public comment end of things. | 00:39:32 | |
| Kind of understand. | 00:39:38 | |
| As you're getting your thoughts and ideas together. | 00:39:43 | |
| I just want to go over again. | 00:39:47 | |
| Sort of the new subdivision, the open space and recreational area requirements. | 00:39:49 | |
| So for a site containing residential, single family or townhomes would need to provide 15% of the developable land for open space | 00:39:54 | |
| that has been done. That's the kind of minimum requirement. | 00:40:01 | |
| In addition to that. | 00:40:08 | |
| A residential subdivision greater than 25 units will need to provide 300 square feet of passive and active recreation space per | 00:40:10 | |
| unit. | 00:40:14 | |
| That has been provided so the way that the residential density bonus works. | 00:40:19 | |
| Is that what the applicant has done? | 00:40:24 | |
| Is they've selected from those density bonus kind of menu items, if you will? | 00:40:27 | |
| So there are amenities beyond the minimum open and recreational space. | 00:40:32 | |
| That have been provided up to two times the amount of required open space. | 00:40:38 | |
| There's a preservation of significant natural features such as. | 00:40:43 | |
| The non mitigated wetlands This site actually has quite a few wetlands. | 00:40:47 | |
| And then sort of the proposal for decorative plazas. | 00:40:52 | |
| And the like throughout the development. | 00:40:56 | |
| So again. | 00:40:58 | |
| The applicant is seeking. | 00:41:00 | |
| Density multiplier of .5. | 00:41:02 | |
| Beyond the. | 00:41:05 | |
| The standard R1 zoning. | 00:41:08 | |
| And they've added two Staffs review. | 00:41:10 | |
| At least enough additional. | 00:41:15 | |
| Amenities for a .6. | 00:41:17 | |
| OK. And I would just add, I mean, I think what we've been working on. | 00:41:20 | |
| Diligently on this we've had a lot of. | 00:41:24 | |
| Prior subdivision and particularly. | 00:41:27 | |
| Planned development that we're pushing for as much density. | 00:41:31 | |
| As they could get and I think. | 00:41:35 | |
| The public. | 00:41:38 | |
| And members of this Commission. | 00:41:39 | |
| That wasn't really what we wanted to see in the community. | 00:41:42 | |
| And this site plan that you're seeing looks very different. | 00:41:45 | |
| Than what the majority of the proposals that have come? | 00:41:50 | |
| To us in the past. | 00:41:54 | |
| In recent past and and I think that's because of the work that was. | 00:41:56 | |
| Done on this. | 00:42:00 | |
| It's nice to see the first example. | 00:42:02 | |
| I know it feels good, right? | 00:42:05 | |
| That's a lot of work. | 00:42:07 | |
| Jamie, can you remind me? | 00:42:09 | |
| I know. | 00:42:11 | |
| We had a lot of back and forth in the past and I don't know what the final, I don't recall what the final language is. | 00:42:12 | |
| With this question about we have setbacks. | 00:42:19 | |
| As buffer zones, but they're. | 00:42:23 | |
| Part of our question had often been. | 00:42:25 | |
| You know, is that an area that's just been cleared, it's simply a set back or do we have? | 00:42:28 | |
| Visual buffer and I'm hearing in the presentation that we have areas that are left natural, so you wouldn't lose that. | 00:42:33 | |
| Undergrowth, which is the visual on that and I think we have language about. | 00:42:42 | |
| Either natural vegetative buffer or fencing on that. Yeah. So we offered that was the buffering. | 00:42:46 | |
| Was one of the elements of our subdivision ordinance rewrite that was met with. | 00:42:55 | |
| Some raised eyebrows from the development community. So we did and do offer more flexibility. So the starting point is kind of 25 | 00:43:02 | |
| foot undisturbed vegetated buffer. But we we do see some very nice interventions such as. | 00:43:10 | |
| Vegetated burns with privacy fences, you know, and I think what would be a good suggestion from the Commission if you should. | 00:43:19 | |
| Be interested in proceeding. | 00:43:29 | |
| Is really a more detail. | 00:43:30 | |
| And perhaps a transect or sort of a view. | 00:43:33 | |
| Of what? Similar to what was done here for the roadway of what would be proposed and the width. | 00:43:38 | |
| Of those. | 00:43:46 | |
| Proposed buffers. | 00:43:47 | |
| Some questions I did have about. | 00:43:49 | |
| You know, bringing electricity to the site. | 00:43:53 | |
| Have you guys looked at that? | 00:43:57 | |
| We. | 00:44:02 | |
| Has the electric is obviously runs down Saint Mary's Road, but we would have it within the community would all be underground. So | 00:44:05 | |
| everything we would do you know through you can show in the on the right of way cross section there is a utility corridor. | 00:44:11 | |
| That would be where that would come and then stub out to each individual lot, but it would be underground. No power poles with it. | 00:44:18 | |
| Other than. | 00:44:23 | |
| The required streetlights, great. So one of the things that we're struggling with right now on the Exit 1 development. | 00:44:24 | |
| Is the extension of the of the power and you know, we're we're artfully trying to negotiate with Georgia Power, not a full | 00:44:31 | |
| clearing of the tree line on Saint Mary's Road, so. | 00:44:36 | |
| I think. | 00:44:42 | |
| The the view of this development from Saint Mary's Road will be one that is vegetated tree line. It'll be yeah, yeah, that would | 00:44:43 | |
| be our goal. | 00:44:47 | |
| Yeah. | 00:44:51 | |
| Also, one thing that was mentioned just for the Commission. | 00:44:53 | |
| Talk through a little bit, and I don't know if we explicitly said this, but I think this is. | 00:44:57 | |
| Of interest to. | 00:45:02 | |
| The residential community that is to the east. | 00:45:04 | |
| Of the proposed development. | 00:45:08 | |
| This area that you're seeing here, which kind of lacks color. | 00:45:10 | |
| That's how in our zoning map, we identify an established right of way. | 00:45:16 | |
| So that was, at one point in time, meant to be an extension of Mickler. | 00:45:21 | |
| To Saint Mary's Road. | 00:45:28 | |
| Staff has discussed this quite a bit internally and also with the applicant. | 00:45:30 | |
| With the existence of that. | 00:45:36 | |
| Railroad and the challenges of getting a railroad crossing. | 00:45:39 | |
| The wetlands that exist within that right of way. | 00:45:44 | |
| It has been sort of. | 00:45:47 | |
| It has been. | 00:45:50 | |
| Dropped. | 00:45:51 | |
| As a potential extension. | 00:45:52 | |
| Of McClure. | 00:45:55 | |
| So the access points as proposed. | 00:45:56 | |
| By sorry, my apologies, I keep flicking through all of these. | 00:45:59 | |
| Nope, gonna get it right. | 00:46:04 | |
| Here there is. | 00:46:06 | |
| So the you know the entry point that is being proposed right now. | 00:46:08 | |
| Is that that main entry off of Mickler and you can see the? | 00:46:13 | |
| Right of way or off of Saint Mary's Road. Apologies. | 00:46:17 | |
| And you can see the right of way here that is essentially being undisturbed. | 00:46:20 | |
| And we did that intentionally to minimize the wetlands impacts. | 00:46:24 | |
| One other thing I do want to point out which was alluded to. | 00:46:30 | |
| As some of you may recall. | 00:46:36 | |
| This area. | 00:46:39 | |
| Which is. | 00:46:41 | |
| On the other side of Saint Mary's Road. | 00:46:42 | |
| Is part of a planned development district known as Sweetgrass. | 00:46:45 | |
| It's been kind of floating around for a while, but the landholder is still interested in proceeding. | 00:46:51 | |
| They will have an entrance off of Saint Mary's Road. | 00:46:59 | |
| That cuts north. | 00:47:02 | |
| Kind of close to this Forestry Rd. here. | 00:47:05 | |
| This area is proposed for condominiums that has been approved and has gone through. | 00:47:08 | |
| This area here is mixed-use development. | 00:47:15 | |
| So you'll have office, retail, commercial. | 00:47:19 | |
| And we're. | 00:47:23 | |
| We're speaking with the. | 00:47:24 | |
| Developers right now. | 00:47:27 | |
| The interior roadway, there'll be sort of an A parallel interior roadway here. | 00:47:30 | |
| Which will have a multimodal path be golf carnival. | 00:47:36 | |
| Highly landscaped and the approach here is to try to create some. | 00:47:40 | |
| Community scale commercial that this community. | 00:47:47 | |
| Could walk or golf cartoon. | 00:47:50 | |
| So I don't envision. | 00:47:52 | |
| A connection over Saint Mary's Road before these, between these two developments, you know. | 00:47:55 | |
| That's something that we're working on. | 00:48:01 | |
| On the other side of Saint Mary's Road, with intersection cuts and connections and traffic lights. | 00:48:03 | |
| I don't see that here. I see this will be. | 00:48:08 | |
| One if not 2 entrances and no real. | 00:48:10 | |
| Connectivity to the other side. | 00:48:15 | |
| You know, unless you got in your car and got on the road and. | 00:48:19 | |
| Turned in, but there will be sort of a higher density development in that part of. | 00:48:21 | |
| The undeveloped region there. | 00:48:28 | |
| And lastly, what I'll say is that the a portion of. | 00:48:30 | |
| The parcels under discussion are located in Tax Allocation district #3. | 00:48:35 | |
| So some of the future. | 00:48:41 | |
| Whether they be. | 00:48:43 | |
| Multimodal path improvements or. | 00:48:46 | |
| Public right of way improvements. Something like that could be. | 00:48:49 | |
| Pursued through our tax allocation district. | 00:48:54 | |
| Application process. | 00:48:58 | |
| Thank you. | 00:49:02 | |
| Elaine, if you yes, I guess the area. | 00:49:03 | |
| That I have the most questions about is the one that is the R1 with the. | 00:49:07 | |
| Largest number of homes in a. | 00:49:13 | |
| When I look at it, it looks like you're going to have an awful lot of traffic going. | 00:49:17 | |
| Out of that area, in front of a handful of houses, out to get to the exit. | 00:49:23 | |
| And it just seems like it's. | 00:49:29 | |
| Going to be a lot of traffic in that right in that section. I know you're going to be doing traffic studies and. | 00:49:33 | |
| You're hoping to get other. | 00:49:38 | |
| Yes, absence, but you're inside their community. | 00:49:40 | |
| You're speaking, I'm inside the community. I think you're referring to this, this area here. | 00:49:43 | |
| Passing in front of a few select houses there. Yes, yes, those are all. Those are all duplexes too, are they not? No, those will | 00:49:48 | |
| still be the single family. | 00:49:52 | |
| So yes, there you know, unfortunately that's going to be regardless there's. | 00:49:57 | |
| There's going to be some pinch points somewhere along the line. We do our best to try and minimize that. We are kind of. | 00:50:03 | |
| It's a balance we're trying to achieve the best balance of. | 00:50:10 | |
| How much you know Woodlands do we take out? Do we put in more streets? How much wetlands do we remove? | 00:50:14 | |
| We know that those are going to be. | 00:50:21 | |
| The more difficult houses to sell, to be honest and but yeah, it's a balance we. | 00:50:24 | |
| Try to minimize that as best we can. And then I was also concerned because of the density of the area. | 00:50:30 | |
| How big are the driveways? How many cars can park on? | 00:50:40 | |
| Their personal lot, yeah. So they would be a 16 foot wide driveway. It would match this two car garage. | 00:50:44 | |
| So you would be able to park at least two vehicles. | 00:50:52 | |
| In the garage and two and two parking spaces. Surface parking in the driveway. | 00:50:55 | |
| Because that was the other question, is company parking? | 00:51:00 | |
| Those streets, I know you're just trying to make them a little wider, but I mean, if. | 00:51:06 | |
| Folks parked all in the street. | 00:51:10 | |
| And emergency vehicles had to get in. It could be a bit of a problem and we. | 00:51:12 | |
| And we would go back and need to adjust that, but that may be part of our. | 00:51:18 | |
| HOA covenants and restrictions is that we would not have any on street parking. | 00:51:23 | |
| But then if you didn't have any on street, where would they put? Where would the company? | 00:51:28 | |
| Park that. You would have 4 parking spaces per unit. There would also be. | 00:51:33 | |
| There is also additional and some of the amenity spaces there, there's parking there. | 00:51:37 | |
| We know it. | 00:51:43 | |
| We feel that it meets the requirement, I mean. | 00:51:44 | |
| Could we stop people from throwing a big birthday bash and having a bunch of cars down the street? You know, I don't know, but we | 00:51:47 | |
| would have that restrictions in place to try to minimize that. At least no parking on only one side of the street or something on | 00:51:52 | |
| that or? | 00:51:57 | |
| Yeah, you're right. The other concern I think you've answered, but I'm assuming there'll be a lot of families with children here. | 00:52:02 | |
| And the school is like right over there on the other side of the. | 00:52:09 | |
| Railroad tracks. | 00:52:13 | |
| And they're probably too close to get busing. | 00:52:15 | |
| Yeah, so I'm worried about these little ******* trying to squeeze through whatever you put up to get to that school because | 00:52:19 | |
| walking all the way around. | 00:52:25 | |
| Is a long way, yeah. | 00:52:31 | |
| That would be. That's a bit of a concern for me too. Understood. Yeah, I think that's fair. We'd be happy to discuss that and come | 00:52:32 | |
| to the resolution with the tell kids. They're gonna try and find a way. Yeah. | 00:52:39 | |
| A resolution with the with the school district, we can, we can work through that maybe if they look at it. | 00:52:45 | |
| Instead of a straight line if there is. | 00:52:50 | |
| But yeah, with the railroad there and we talked about that with some of the restrictions. | 00:52:53 | |
| The difficulty of any type of railroad crossing. | 00:52:57 | |
| Is just hard to come by these days so. | 00:53:01 | |
| But we would be open to talking about that with the school district. Those were my primary concern. Thank you. Thank you. | 00:53:04 | |
| What's your? What is the? | 00:53:11 | |
| Percentage. | 00:53:12 | |
| Of duplex versus single family, Oh gosh, I'm looking at, let's see, it's less than half would be the duplexes of the 325, it's | 00:53:14 | |
| 179. | 00:53:20 | |
| Of the detached and 146 of the attached. So it's pretty much. | 00:53:26 | |
| Kind of 5050. It's a little little, yeah, there's. | 00:53:31 | |
| Slightly more of the detached homes on the bigger lots. | 00:53:35 | |
| One of my big concerns. | 00:53:38 | |
| I live right around the corner there. | 00:53:40 | |
| At Aspe Cove. | 00:53:44 | |
| We've had quite a few people killed. | 00:53:45 | |
| Trying to get out of Osprey Cove on the Saint Mary's Road. | 00:53:47 | |
| The bulk of the people coming out of this, they're going to be turning left. | 00:53:50 | |
| Because if you turn right and go to Colerain. | 00:53:54 | |
| Turn left. You can go to Saint Mary's or you can go to 95 right. | 00:53:56 | |
| You need another entrance on the. | 00:54:01 | |
| Saint Mary's for this many people. Yes, that. | 00:54:03 | |
| And I couldn't approve. | 00:54:06 | |
| Can't even consider approving it until you can show you have two entrances. Well, we've got 3 on this site plan we've got right | 00:54:09 | |
| now. There's you don't have the approval form. | 00:54:13 | |
| Omega Cubia. | 00:54:18 | |
| Or do you that's a question that statement. | 00:54:20 | |
| It's a good possibility he won't get the second entrance. | 00:54:23 | |
| Off that. | 00:54:28 | |
| I know for a fact. | 00:54:30 | |
| The dot turned down 1 developer before. | 00:54:31 | |
| Try to get a psychiatrist. | 00:54:35 | |
| Down towards Colerain Rd. | 00:54:37 | |
| What we would like to see one foot. | 00:54:39 | |
| DLT and the Navy both have to approve. | 00:54:42 | |
| A second interest on that room. | 00:54:46 | |
| Because it is. | 00:54:48 | |
| A limited access Rd. | 00:54:49 | |
| And the city's got no say so over it. | 00:54:52 | |
| Second question, is something you said a little disturbing? | 00:54:56 | |
| He said these are going to be $300,000 houses. | 00:55:01 | |
| Yet you're saying they're they're four bedroom? | 00:55:04 | |
| There they would be. | 00:55:08 | |
| You didn't mention square footage at all. | 00:55:10 | |
| They're in the slides there. I can show you some of those. | 00:55:12 | |
| I don't see this as a. | 00:55:17 | |
| Have a positive impact. | 00:55:19 | |
| On the communities that are already there, I see it being a negative. | 00:55:21 | |
| And the pricing is of course. | 00:55:25 | |
| We're trying to look two years into the future and so when these houses will actually come to market based on if they were here | 00:55:29 | |
| today from what our cost and and what. | 00:55:34 | |
| We feel would be a viable project and would be sell. | 00:55:40 | |
| Would be able to sell. | 00:55:44 | |
| Would be and that would be on the smaller end for those 350 or the 300, you know that would be at the. | 00:55:46 | |
| Three bedroom, 2 bath. | 00:55:53 | |
| 1500 to 1800 square foot your single. | 00:55:55 | |
| Single level. | 00:55:58 | |
| And then the other ones you know, that be 2350 square feet, four bedroom, 2 1/2 bath. | 00:56:00 | |
| What we call our Headley Bay model. | 00:56:06 | |
| But we would be starting. | 00:56:09 | |
| In those ranges there in the mid twos and then in the mid threes for the other community that's going in now. | 00:56:11 | |
| I believe they're staring at six. | 00:56:19 | |
| Which is 1 heck of a Yeah, I don't I I'm not sure. I mean, I have to interject here. | 00:56:23 | |
| Not apples to apples there. I think that's not at all. I think, you know, it's a, it would be a, a gated community. | 00:56:29 | |
| Resort amenities, which will start in the sixes. | 00:56:36 | |
| But umm. | 00:56:39 | |
| We do have an existing housing development, Hayden Point, if you'll remember that it's gone through. It's now in its third phase. | 00:56:40 | |
| Hayden Point, another large home developer, can bring, you know, a. | 00:56:49 | |
| 1600 square foot, 3 bedroom, 2 bath, single family home to market at about 3:15 3/30. | 00:56:55 | |
| So, and those are. | 00:57:02 | |
| I mean, if our permit tech was here, she would tell you they they come through and they sell. I'm more concerned about the | 00:57:04 | |
| entrance. | 00:57:07 | |
| Under the highway, yeah. And we would have the traffic studies and we've worked with G dot on that to make sure that. | 00:57:11 | |
| Everything is adequate and maybe. | 00:57:17 | |
| Whatever if their signalization required or whatever it is that we are asked to do. | 00:57:20 | |
| By the Department of Transportation is what we plan to meet. | 00:57:25 | |
| Thank you. | 00:57:31 | |
| Other questions from. | 00:57:32 | |
| Members. | 00:57:33 | |
| Yep. All right. Thank you. We're going to address the sexual plan. I'll address in the. | 00:57:35 | |
| We're addressing all. | 00:57:42 | |
| Elements of this will take separate actions for the rezoning versus the versus the conceptual. But for this. | 00:57:44 | |
| Purpose of the discussion and also the public comment, we're going to look at all both the rezoning and the conceptual. So any | 00:57:51 | |
| questions you have on either one of those. | 00:57:56 | |
| Categories want to bring forward. | 00:58:01 | |
| OK. All right. So with that, we're going to open up our public comment section. | 00:58:03 | |
| Of this, so if you'd like to give comment on this, if you'll come forward, give your name and address. | 00:58:09 | |
| Question. | 00:58:16 | |
| We, I think as part of public comment you can pose what your questions are and we'll try to see if we can. | 00:58:19 | |
| Answer them. | 00:58:26 | |
| So do I have anyone for public comment on this item? | 00:58:28 | |
| You'll come forward. | 00:58:32 | |
| Dave Schmitz, 112 new hammock. | 00:58:37 | |
| Circle up and shadow on. | 00:58:40 | |
| It's on green. | 00:58:43 | |
| I think you're good, maybe just closer. | 00:58:45 | |
| Understanding this is early in the conversation. | 00:58:48 | |
| For what's going on here. | 00:58:51 | |
| Umm, but. | 00:58:54 | |
| One of my concerns and looking at what's been presented today. | 00:58:57 | |
| And I think. | 00:59:01 | |
| Mr. White. | 00:59:03 | |
| Addressed it. | 00:59:05 | |
| Fairly well. | 00:59:06 | |
| But come on folks. | 00:59:09 | |
| Every family is going to have at least two cars and if they've got kids, maybe 3 or 4. | 00:59:11 | |
| Umm. | 00:59:17 | |
| In the conceptual drawing. | 00:59:22 | |
| It looked to me like there was room behind the house that maybe you could move the house back a little bit or make the driveway | 00:59:25 | |
| wider. | 00:59:28 | |
| But umm. | 00:59:32 | |
| With no on street parking. | 00:59:33 | |
| I suspect that parking is going to be an issue. | 00:59:36 | |
| I would question. | 00:59:40 | |
| Who, when this is all said and done and and people are moving in, who owns the roads? | 00:59:42 | |
| Are they going to be part of the subdivision's HOA's responsibility? | 00:59:50 | |
| As they are like in Ashby Cove. | 00:59:56 | |
| Or are they gonna be? | 00:59:58 | |
| A city issue. | 01:00:02 | |
| Or government issue. | 01:00:04 | |
| I didn't see. | 01:00:08 | |
| Anything addressing? | 01:00:10 | |
| Probably every 3rd house will have a book parked in front of it or next to it. | 01:00:13 | |
| So. | 01:00:17 | |
| This early in the conversation, maybe there ought to be some. | 01:00:20 | |
| Thought given to boat and RV parking. | 01:00:23 | |
| I didn't see on there. | 01:00:31 | |
| How wide the driveways were for the duplexes. | 01:00:33 | |
| But their single car? | 01:00:37 | |
| So I'm guessing the driveways aren't as wide as a. | 01:00:39 | |
| Two car driveway. | 01:00:42 | |
| And does that indicate that each family would then only be able to park one in the garage and one in the driveway? | 01:00:44 | |
| Again. | 01:00:52 | |
| If there's a teenager in the house, you're going to have at least three cars. | 01:00:53 | |
| And I figured this was the time to talk about that stuff, so. | 01:00:58 | |
| Thank you for your time. | 01:01:02 | |
| Mr. White, I don't know if you want to respond. | 01:01:03 | |
| To any of those. | 01:01:06 | |
| Questions that you've got a quick answer for. | 01:01:08 | |
| The I can speak to. | 01:01:11 | |
| It is our standard practice as a company that. | 01:01:15 | |
| We as part of our HOA guidelines that we will have established. | 01:01:18 | |
| There will not be any. | 01:01:23 | |
| RV or boat parking. | 01:01:24 | |
| Allowed in front of the homes or on the street? If it's something that can be fit in a garage then. | 01:01:27 | |
| Wonderful. | 01:01:32 | |
| But otherwise it can't be exposed throughout the street. | 01:01:33 | |
| The parking requirements. | 01:01:37 | |
| I would just ask you know that we would just be asked to meet what is required by the code. | 01:01:39 | |
| As we do that. | 01:01:45 | |
| Whatever those those calculated number of spaces are. | 01:01:46 | |
| Will meet that requirement if it means that we need to find some place for some surface parking. | 01:01:50 | |
| In order to meet that requirement, we will work that in, but at this point we feel like we've we've met what? | 01:01:56 | |
| Required by code and we will. | 01:02:02 | |
| Make sure that we always will. | 01:02:04 | |
| And then ownership on streets, infrastructure, you know, we've talked to. | 01:02:06 | |
| We're open either way to whatever is obviously what is agreeable to the city, whether it's dedicated to the city. | 01:02:12 | |
| Through the. | 01:02:20 | |
| We can do that. | 01:02:21 | |
| If if you would, if the city would prefer and as we go through the planning process. | 01:02:23 | |
| For those dedications, if the city has an objection to that. | 01:02:28 | |
| We would be hoping to do that. It would just mean that it would that would be more the maintenance cost that would passed on to | 01:02:32 | |
| the homeowners. | 01:02:35 | |
| OK. | 01:02:40 | |
| All right. | 01:02:42 | |
| Ken Jolly 102 Salt grass trace here in Saint Mary's. | 01:02:46 | |
| Relative to recreational vehicles. | 01:02:50 | |
| For the most part. | 01:02:54 | |
| They don't fit in a garage. They're just not going to go in there. | 01:02:55 | |
| So living in shadow lawn, we have the same problem. | 01:02:58 | |
| Individuals have attempted then to park on. | 01:03:04 | |
| The grass which? | 01:03:08 | |
| Is not permitted. | 01:03:09 | |
| So that's something to consider is there are going to be people that have RV's, they're going to be folks that have large boats. | 01:03:11 | |
| That will not fit in the garage. | 01:03:18 | |
| They're going to have two cars parked in the driveway, maybe more. | 01:03:20 | |
| Where will that recreational vehicle or larger? | 01:03:25 | |
| Larger boat go. | 01:03:28 | |
| The other question. | 01:03:30 | |
| I don't travel a lot up and down St. Mary's Rd. but. | 01:03:32 | |
| As I recall when I do. | 01:03:36 | |
| Isn't there a grassed median? | 01:03:39 | |
| All the way on that part of Saint Mary's Road. | 01:03:42 | |
| So if you were to be exiting from this development, need to turn left. | 01:03:46 | |
| You would have to turn right. | 01:03:50 | |
| And go to Colerain Road and make a left and then come back. | 01:03:52 | |
| You could go straight across. | 01:03:56 | |
| You're straight across the grass median. That's where people die. | 01:03:58 | |
| Well, that's not permitted. | 01:04:02 | |
| I think that it's another. | 01:04:04 | |
| Awful Saint Mary right across the street. | 01:04:07 | |
| From this one. | 01:04:11 | |
| And I think. | 01:04:13 | |
| It is a turn around me. I'm not. I don't remember. I don't recall so. | 01:04:14 | |
| But that's something to take a look at and. | 01:04:21 | |
| And then evaluate. Thank you very much. | 01:04:24 | |
| OK. | 01:04:26 | |
| I have. And if you'll give your name and address, my name is Andrea Cody. I live at 201 Tory Drive. | 01:04:32 | |
| And Miss Stein, if you would zoom out, I'll show you exactly where I am. | 01:04:39 | |
| So I. | 01:04:45 | |
| Right here. | 01:04:48 | |
| And we've lived there since 2012. | 01:04:53 | |
| So we've been there a little while, saw the land change. | 01:04:55 | |
| Hands a few times after Oscar passed away, but. | 01:04:59 | |
| I do have a question. So the townhouses, are they going to be for sale or for rent or for? | 01:05:02 | |
| They will be approved. | 01:05:09 | |
| Should I speak to the microphone? Yeah. | 01:05:11 | |
| That's OK. | 01:05:14 | |
| They will be a fee simple separate lot, meaning they are sold now. There won't be a restriction at least to where if somebody buys | 01:05:15 | |
| it and they want to rent their house. | 01:05:21 | |
| But each one will be a four cell unit, OK. | 01:05:26 | |
| Because I, I heard you mentioned the property management and I thought, well, this is going to be a rental thing or like a | 01:05:29 | |
| apartment complex or townhouse complex. | 01:05:33 | |
| And I was confused. | 01:05:38 | |
| And the other thing I wanted to say, somebody talked about the utilities as far as power. | 01:05:39 | |
| But also. | 01:05:46 | |
| Has anybody looked into water? | 01:05:47 | |
| The utilities for the water because I know we've had some issues. | 01:05:49 | |
| With the water system. | 01:05:54 | |
| Near Marilee Clark. I don't know if anybody knew about that recently, but. | 01:05:56 | |
| We've had some water issues. | 01:06:01 | |
| With the sewer. | 01:06:04 | |
| And merely around Marilee Clark and in our issue, we have some flooding issues just because there are behind my house on my lot. | 01:06:06 | |
| I have protected wetlands that I can't. | 01:06:13 | |
| Destroy. I can't build on or anything. | 01:06:16 | |
| And I know we spoke on the lots for proposed rezoning. There's some wetlands there are. I didn't know if they were. | 01:06:18 | |
| Any protective wetlands or if they were just wetlands that. | 01:06:25 | |
| Can be mitigated and built on. | 01:06:28 | |
| And as far as mitigating and built on it. | 01:06:31 | |
| I was going to have the same comment about the townhouses the the the duplexes. | 01:06:35 | |
| With the one car garage and I've seen them. | 01:06:39 | |
| I we lived in Virginia for a while, so I have I'm familiar with Ryan Holmes and some of their buildings. | 01:06:43 | |
| And the single. | 01:06:48 | |
| Garage with the townhouse units. They have the the narrow driveway. | 01:06:51 | |
| If you have two. | 01:06:55 | |
| Two people like a husband and a wife. | 01:06:57 | |
| If one parks in the garage and one parks in the driveway. | 01:06:59 | |
| I mean, there's no, there's no with an 8 foot wide driveway, there's no jockeying around somebody if the person in the garage has | 01:07:03 | |
| to leave before the person in the driveway and. | 01:07:07 | |
| And I mean, I've raised two teenagers, so we've had four cars in our driveway at one point in time. | 01:07:11 | |
| And parking on the road if you're not going to park on the road. | 01:07:16 | |
| Then you come into. | 01:07:21 | |
| An issue with. | 01:07:23 | |
| Just the amount of drivers that. | 01:07:24 | |
| In the amount of cars. | 01:07:26 | |
| So maybe if. | 01:07:28 | |
| If you're going to have the 8 foot wide driveways. | 01:07:30 | |
| Put some spaces in the community for overflow parking I think. | 01:07:34 | |
| I've seen this in a couple developments around in this in Camden County. I can't remember where but they have. | 01:07:41 | |
| Oh, on in Kingsland as you go by. | 01:07:48 | |
| The golf course there where? | 01:07:51 | |
| Laurel Island is they have a couple overflow. | 01:07:55 | |
| Parking lots that are right off color right there that you can see. | 01:07:58 | |
| And, umm. | 01:08:01 | |
| I mean, that's an option, but I was, I was more. | 01:08:02 | |
| Concerned about the utilities, not only the power, but the water. | 01:08:05 | |
| And infrastructure before we go. | 01:08:11 | |
| Hog wild and. | 01:08:13 | |
| And building all this stuff. | 01:08:14 | |
| And my other question to. | 01:08:16 | |
| The builder was the 30 foot or 25 foot set back from the railroad tracks. | 01:08:19 | |
| So the railroad tracks have. | 01:08:24 | |
| They're raised a bit, and then there's a. | 01:08:27 | |
| And then it goes into the trees. | 01:08:30 | |
| Of their. | 01:08:32 | |
| Of their land, their proposed. | 01:08:34 | |
| Rebuild. Yeah, so. | 01:08:37 | |
| Yeah. So is is the 30 foot going to be from the actual track? | 01:08:41 | |
| To there or is it going to be from where the trees start right now because the trees are set back? | 01:08:50 | |
| The trees don't start, but probably 20. | 01:08:55 | |
| Or so feet from the tracks right now. | 01:08:58 | |
| So I was wondering if. | 01:09:01 | |
| That 25 foot thing, if they're just going to mow down all the trees and just come right up almost to the rocks and where the | 01:09:02 | |
| railroad track is. | 01:09:06 | |
| That was my other question, because the trains do occasionally move on those tracks. They. | 01:09:10 | |
| Their their deadlines, but they still. | 01:09:15 | |
| They still park their trains there sometimes they use it as like an overflow. | 01:09:18 | |
| Type situation. | 01:09:23 | |
| And I do call the police occasionally for the non-emergency number for children who are climbing all over the rail cars and | 01:09:25 | |
| things. | 01:09:29 | |
| And throw rocks at my house but. | 01:09:32 | |
| Yeah, I don't mind until it gets my yard the rocks. | 01:09:35 | |
| And I think those are my only questions and comments and concerns. | 01:09:40 | |
| But thank you for your time. | 01:09:45 | |
| Mr. White, do you want to? | 01:09:47 | |
| Particularly, we've got a question about. | 01:09:50 | |
| How the setback or I don't know if? | 01:09:52 | |
| Jamie, correct me if I'm wrong, Jay, the 25 foot set back would come from. | 01:09:54 | |
| The property line. | 01:10:00 | |
| Not from the railroad track, so if I could show it would be the 25 feet. | 01:10:01 | |
| From here this way. | 01:10:05 | |
| So all that additional from the railroad would still remain. | 01:10:07 | |
| So that would be additional on top of that. | 01:10:11 | |
| So, and I'm sorry, what? | 01:10:13 | |
| What other questions? Is there anything else I can answer? | 01:10:16 | |
| There was a question about protected wetlands and whether there were any plans to. | 01:10:19 | |
| Mitigate yes. So we have in in our plant. So they are not. | 01:10:25 | |
| Protected in the sense that they're put in a conservation. | 01:10:30 | |
| Easement but so they are available we if we chose to. | 01:10:34 | |
| We could mitigate them, we just choose not to. | 01:10:39 | |
| We want to leave that as. | 01:10:42 | |
| Something to beautify the area to keep that. We know that that's what folks are coming here and they want to. | 01:10:45 | |
| Experience as as part of their community and we want to be able to do that. | 01:10:52 | |
| With the parking, we know that. | 01:10:57 | |
| Not everybody wants A1 car garage with a little tiny skinny driveway. | 01:11:00 | |
| But we feel that there are. | 01:11:05 | |
| Folks who that there is a market. | 01:11:08 | |
| For that and we feel like that might be an underserved market here, particularly maybe with the. | 01:11:10 | |
| With the. | 01:11:16 | |
| Military, uh. | 01:11:17 | |
| That would be that there are folks who. | 01:11:18 | |
| Would love to have it would fit their needs to have that type of garage, that type of driveway and that type of home to live in | 01:11:23 | |
| and and they will be yes they will be for sale when we talk about. | 01:11:29 | |
| A property management company that is for the community as a whole to make sure. | 01:11:35 | |
| The grass is being mowed and the pool is being cleaned and that sort of thing. It's not for each individual lot, it's for the | 01:11:39 | |
| community, common areas. | 01:11:43 | |
| And then Jamie, I thought maybe if you want to comment about the process on because we're really only on. | 01:11:48 | |
| Conceptual plan here about analysis. | 01:11:54 | |
| On parking standards and also about infrastructure needs, water, sewer. | 01:11:57 | |
| Yeah. So I think. | 01:12:03 | |
| I'll address. Yeah, sure, sure. | 01:12:06 | |
| What we can do is if you should move to approve at the preliminary plat. | 01:12:10 | |
| Level of review. | 01:12:17 | |
| A few more of the details will be worked out and I think perhaps there's an opportunity there to look for some additional parking | 01:12:19 | |
| spaces. | 01:12:23 | |
| We may also, as staff, explore in the duplex product if there is an opportunity. | 01:12:28 | |
| To maybe do a little bump out here. | 01:12:36 | |
| Maybe make a wider driveway potential, I think there's some avenues that staff can take. | 01:12:39 | |
| With the applicant. | 01:12:46 | |
| To both review parking requirements and to try to add in a little bit more additional parking at the preliminary plat. | 01:12:48 | |
| Level umm. | 01:12:56 | |
| So to address water and sewer. | 01:12:56 | |
| So right now we're looking at the action of. | 01:13:00 | |
| Rezoning the land. | 01:13:04 | |
| Sort of conceptually laying out densities, where homes will be, where roads will be, setbacks, buffers, landscaping. | 01:13:06 | |
| If that does proceed and move forward, the next step will be a little bit of a tighter drawing lines on paper, showing us where | 01:13:15 | |
| those lots will be more exact than what you're seeing in this conceptual plat. | 01:13:20 | |
| Some things may move, some things may change. | 01:13:26 | |
| I think what I would recommend to the applicant. | 01:13:29 | |
| Is to sort of show those wetlands, show what is mitigated, show what is not being mitigated. I think that speaks volumes in this. | 01:13:32 | |
| Development. | 01:13:43 | |
| And would kind of put that message across a little bit more clearly and is also what is getting you that density bonus. | 01:13:44 | |
| And then? | 01:13:52 | |
| If the Commission should choose to proceed beyond the preliminary plat level, then the engineering comes in and takes place and we | 01:13:53 | |
| start to working internally as a team with our public works department, with our Fire Chief, with our building official, the | 01:14:00 | |
| planning and zoning team. We're looking at all of the elements to make sure it meets the zoning, the densities, the setbacks, the | 01:14:06 | |
| roadway design standards. | 01:14:13 | |
| And then at a certain point. | 01:14:20 | |
| We'll put this forward to the Environmental Protection Division that will look at the water and sewer capacity, the draw in the | 01:14:22 | |
| water and make sure that all that capacity is there. | 01:14:27 | |
| And that will be designed and looked at by engineers and signed off on. So it's not something that. | 01:14:32 | |
| This body sees, but it's something that's done kind of behind the scenes to ensure. | 01:14:37 | |
| That the water and sewer infrastructure is put in place. | 01:14:43 | |
| The city also enacts a series of aid to construction fees. Very few people know this, but each single family home puts forward. | 01:14:47 | |
| About $14,000 in aid to construction fees and those go towards the maintenance and upkeep of our water and sewer infrastructure. | 01:14:56 | |
| So you know, with this development comes. | 01:15:03 | |
| The infrastructure that would be put in place and also a significant amount of dollars that would. | 01:15:06 | |
| Go to the city for maintaining that infrastructure. | 01:15:11 | |
| Do we have additional public comment on this item? | 01:15:18 | |
| And again if you give your name and address. | 01:15:22 | |
| My name is Jack Rice. I live at 105 Tory Drive. | 01:15:26 | |
| I'm not here today to speak on opposition of. | 01:15:30 | |
| Improvements or. | 01:15:33 | |
| Things being built. | 01:15:35 | |
| Get a little closer to the mic. | 01:15:37 | |
| I'm here to speak on. | 01:15:39 | |
| Strongly encouraging you all to. | 01:15:41 | |
| Reconsider this single entry entry access point. | 01:15:44 | |
| Speak up, please, Sir. | 01:15:48 | |
| Pick up it goes by a school. | 01:15:50 | |
| An elementary school. | 01:15:54 | |
| There are dozens of children that walk that road daily. | 01:15:56 | |
| I would also strongly. | 01:16:02 | |
| Consider you to. | 01:16:04 | |
| To look back into. | 01:16:07 | |
| There's an abundance of wildlife back. | 01:16:09 | |
| I know that's probably the least of concerns. | 01:16:13 | |
| But I know for a fact that there are Gopher tortoises back there. | 01:16:15 | |
| And I know that that's a protected species in the state of Georgia. | 01:16:20 | |
| With all that being said. | 01:16:25 | |
| I think that's it. | 01:16:27 | |
| Far less prepared as anybody else that stood here tonight. | 01:16:28 | |
| I think that's all I have. | 01:16:33 | |
| OK. Thank you. Thank you. | 01:16:35 | |
| Do you want to, Sir? If you weren't prepared, I'd hate to see if you were, because you were great. Thank you. | 01:16:39 | |
| The uh. | 01:16:46 | |
| A couple of things. | 01:16:48 | |
| One is I can speak to the protected species. | 01:16:50 | |
| We have ordered and are in the process of doing a complete environmental assessment. | 01:16:53 | |
| Which it also includes, you know. | 01:16:58 | |
| It gives us a detailed list of what species are on the property, but also what species. | 01:17:00 | |
| Is this? | 01:17:08 | |
| Habitat for SO even if they don't see them. | 01:17:10 | |
| We got to find out if they're there or not because they potentially could be. | 01:17:13 | |
| So we will do that and also they will look at all. | 01:17:17 | |
| All vegetation, plants, trees. | 01:17:20 | |
| We take all that into consideration and what impacts we have. | 01:17:23 | |
| In order to do this. | 01:17:28 | |
| Project we also have taken the steps of a archaeological survey we've looked for historical. | 01:17:30 | |
| Artifacts. | 01:17:38 | |
| And have gone back and seeing for that and what that would need to do. | 01:17:39 | |
| In any sort of impact archaeologically for the for the community as well. | 01:17:44 | |
| So we're trying to look at all these things we don't know just yet. | 01:17:48 | |
| At this point, we're just conceptual. | 01:17:51 | |
| We're at the. | 01:17:54 | |
| We're just trying to find out. | 01:17:55 | |
| Can we build what we think we want to build here? | 01:17:58 | |
| We may find stuff later on that make it completely. | 01:18:01 | |
| You know, just not feasible for us to do that in which case we will pull the plug, but we just want to get to this initial step to | 01:18:05 | |
| make sure that. | 01:18:09 | |
| Conceptually, we can build. | 01:18:12 | |
| The number of houses of the size of lots. | 01:18:14 | |
| The community that we're envisioning and if conceptually we can do that and move on to the next step. | 01:18:17 | |
| And we'll verify and check all the boxes before we get everything all done, before we ever put a shovel on the ground. | 01:18:23 | |
| Thank you. | 01:18:31 | |
| Do we have other public comment on this item? | 01:18:33 | |
| OK. | 01:18:40 | |
| I'm Charlene Reiness. I live next door to Miss Andrea at 203 Torrey. | 01:18:41 | |
| And something you were saying describing the development, which struck me as crazy. | 01:18:46 | |
| But the more amenities we include, the more dog pass, one pass, the more permission we get to cram more people into this space. | 01:18:52 | |
| That's nuts to me. They still driving, going to school. | 01:18:58 | |
| Using the utilities, I don't see how that makes. | 01:19:05 | |
| Us a better community, cramming more people into a small place. And I know we're going to build. I know we're growing. | 01:19:09 | |
| For these duplexes, I'm going to walk out of my front yard and see these duplexes which. | 01:19:15 | |
| I think we can do better. I think we can do better single family homes. | 01:19:21 | |
| More green space. That's not enough to my liking. | 01:19:25 | |
| I mean, we can do better. Let's not cheapen our area. I spent most of my adult life on Saint Simon's. They have ruined it. | 01:19:29 | |
| Absolutely ruined that neighborhood. There's people on top of people, the traffic, the streets flood. | 01:19:36 | |
| We don't want to have that here. | 01:19:42 | |
| And what will this look like in 10 years? You know it's going to be brand new shiny right now. | 01:19:44 | |
| It's going to get a bunch of renters in there. It's not going to be brand new and shiny forever. The traffic. | 01:19:49 | |
| I mean, let's just make good choices. Let's make something that we're going to be proud of. | 01:19:54 | |
| To look back on, you know, in the future. | 01:19:59 | |
| That's all I have to say. | 01:20:02 | |
| OK. | 01:20:04 | |
| I appreciate that. Thank you for your comment, ma'am. | 01:20:07 | |
| I just wanted to. | 01:20:13 | |
| Make it known that. | 01:20:14 | |
| The density bonus we're asking for if we're looking at just number of units per acre. | 01:20:16 | |
| We, by right, could build more houses than we're asking for right here. The only reason we're asking for a bonus, the bonus is so | 01:20:22 | |
| that we can narrow those lots. We're not asking for more lots, we're just asking that we can do smaller, which gives us more green | 01:20:28 | |
| space by having these smaller lots. | 01:20:33 | |
| So we feel like, uh, uh. | 01:20:39 | |
| You know what we're asking to do. | 01:20:40 | |
| Would be beneficial. | 01:20:42 | |
| We know that. | 01:20:44 | |
| Things are changing, and that's always. | 01:20:46 | |
| Difficult and but we feel like. | 01:20:48 | |
| We build a quality product and we that we can. | 01:20:51 | |
| We can stand behind and you know, I would invite anybody to take a look at any of our projects that have been done for 10 years. | 01:20:55 | |
| We've been in business since 1948. | 01:20:59 | |
| Go look at some of our communities that have been around for 50 years. | 01:21:05 | |
| And and and see what they look like. So thank you. | 01:21:08 | |
| Looks like we have another comment if you want to come forward. | 01:21:13 | |
| I'm Christiane Martin. | 01:21:23 | |
| I live at 620 Victoria Circle, Saint Mary's, Georgia. | 01:21:25 | |
| My concern is. | 01:21:30 | |
| One entrance. | 01:21:31 | |
| Our elementary school. | 01:21:33 | |
| The traffic on that road, it's two lanes. It gets crazy. | 01:21:35 | |
| And we've got little kids walking. I mean taking the back Rd. to it. | 01:21:39 | |
| All that, I don't think that's been taken into consideration. | 01:21:43 | |
| And it really needs to be. It's going to be dangerous. | 01:21:47 | |
| Thank you. | 01:21:51 | |
| If I could, I've I've heard this public comment now twice, so I want to be very clear of how this property is being accessed. | 01:21:53 | |
| It is being accessed off of Saint Mary's Road. | 01:22:02 | |
| The roadway will not. | 01:22:05 | |
| Continue. | 01:22:08 | |
| Mickler So I just I just want to be, I just want to be careful there. So this this drawing. | 01:22:11 | |
| You could perceive that this is going to be. | 01:22:17 | |
| A roadway here, I'm sorry, I'm pointing. You can't see that. | 01:22:21 | |
| This is not. This is undeveloped land. | 01:22:24 | |
| This is just demarcate demarcating. | 01:22:28 | |
| The city's right of way, the roadway we will the development will enter off of Saint Mary's Road. | 01:22:30 | |
| There will be no traffic. | 01:22:37 | |
| Going over and onto Mickler Drive. | 01:22:40 | |
| Can I clarify what I think she's trying? | 01:22:44 | |
| Correct me if I'm wrong and if you give your name and that yes ma'am, my name or Sir, sorry, my name is Ashley Rice. I'm at 105 | 01:22:50 | |
| Tory Dr. also. | 01:22:53 | |
| And I think. | 01:22:57 | |
| One of my concerns as well as maybe theirs. | 01:22:59 | |
| The school entrance a as a city. | 01:23:02 | |
| So now we've got the Esplanade going in at exit 1. | 01:23:07 | |
| This is potential, I hear you saying. There's another subdivision going across the street. | 01:23:11 | |
| My kids go to Mary Lee Clark. The school is going. | 01:23:16 | |
| To explode. | 01:23:20 | |
| It is already. | 01:23:22 | |
| Fairly busy school. | 01:23:24 | |
| And I think. | 01:23:25 | |
| What they're trying to say is that the school entrance only has one entrance, not. | 01:23:27 | |
| Not the neighborhood entrance, but. | 01:23:32 | |
| They're going to go around to Mickler. | 01:23:34 | |
| And everyone is going to pile in. I don't know if you've been down Mickler at drop off or pickup. | 01:23:37 | |
| But it is mass chaos. | 01:23:42 | |
| If you do not get there by two 4245. | 01:23:45 | |
| You're out on the street for pickup and if we're adding all of these extra homes to it. | 01:23:49 | |
| How are we going to accommodate? | 01:23:55 | |
| All of that traffic. | 01:23:58 | |
| Thank you. | 01:24:01 | |
| All right, do we have other comment on this item? | 01:24:05 | |
| All right, seeing none, I'm going to go ahead and close the public comment. | 01:24:11 | |
| Portion of this. | 01:24:15 | |
| With that, then, are there do we have further discussion that we need to have? | 01:24:18 | |
| On this and I think it might be helpful again. | 01:24:23 | |
| If you, Jamie, kind of remind folks. | 01:24:26 | |
| Of our process and what we're doing here tonight versus what? | 01:24:29 | |
| Where the opportunities are. | 01:24:35 | |
| With additional information that it comes back to. | 01:24:37 | |
| The Planning Commission? Sure. Yep, happy to do that. | 01:24:40 | |
| So I also want to take a moment just to, we didn't walk through these materials. I, I know this is a little bit difficult to see | 01:24:44 | |
| here. I apologize. | 01:24:48 | |
| Um, in the application there were. | 01:24:53 | |
| A few conceptual plants that were submitted. | 01:24:58 | |
| What I am showing you now is the. | 01:25:01 | |
| There we go. | 01:25:06 | |
| Is the straight zoning. I'm sorry, I don't know why that keeps going off, but. | 01:25:08 | |
| What I am trying to convey here is to. | 01:25:14 | |
| Address the the the crazy comment that I made earlier. I'm trying to address that. | 01:25:17 | |
| It's not that, it's more and more as Mr. White said. | 01:25:23 | |
| The straight zoning will allow a certain amount of homes. | 01:25:27 | |
| As well as the residential density bonus. So I just. | 01:25:32 | |
| Would encourage the commissioners to look at that overall site plan. | 01:25:37 | |
| In comparison, there is more density and there is more also. | 01:25:42 | |
| Open space is a part of that. | 01:25:47 | |
| The next thing I'll go towards. | 01:25:50 | |
| Is where we are in this process. | 01:25:53 | |
| Right now, this evening before you, is the rezoning of the four parcels. | 01:25:56 | |
| So predominantly shifting what is. | 01:26:01 | |
| Commercial zoning. | 01:26:04 | |
| You know, commercial zoning also has. | 01:26:07 | |
| Very few setbacks has a larger lot coverage allocation, so the intensity of development and going from commercial. | 01:26:10 | |
| Which is currently zoned to residential is a reduction in that development intensity. | 01:26:19 | |
| So before you tonight, is there a rezoning of these 4 parcels? | 01:26:26 | |
| In addition to that, is a conceptual plat. | 01:26:30 | |
| That conceptual plan, as Mr. White said, is showing you. | 01:26:34 | |
| The proposed density. The proposed open space, the proposed amenity space, the layout, the roadways. | 01:26:39 | |
| Not. | 01:26:46 | |
| Fully engineered by any means, just conceptual. | 01:26:47 | |
| If you should move to approve this, it will proceed to Council for review and approval. | 01:26:51 | |
| If that also gets approved, then it will advance. | 01:26:58 | |
| To the next stage, which is the preliminary plot. | 01:27:01 | |
| Little bit more engineering, a little bit more layout. | 01:27:04 | |
| What I would suggest is that we. | 01:27:09 | |
| You know, take any more questions. | 01:27:12 | |
| Discuss potential conditions. | 01:27:15 | |
| If you'd like to take that route. | 01:27:18 | |
| But I think as part of this. | 01:27:21 | |
| Looking at the conceptual plan. | 01:27:23 | |
| You're kind of hearing from the Commission and from the public. | 01:27:26 | |
| About the concerns about. | 01:27:29 | |
| Traffic access. | 01:27:32 | |
| Impact on schools. | 01:27:35 | |
| Buffer zones on site parking, So those are. | 01:27:37 | |
| I think kind of a preview. | 01:27:41 | |
| Of when we get to a preliminary plat. | 01:27:43 | |
| Of things that as you're moving forward on this process. | 01:27:46 | |
| That there will be more detail. | 01:27:50 | |
| And you've already talked about? | 01:27:52 | |
| Traffic study and you know G dot. | 01:27:54 | |
| And coordinating with them on what's allowable, what's not allowable and sort of things. So we're kind of stepping. | 01:27:58 | |
| Through this. | 01:28:04 | |
| Process so. | 01:28:05 | |
| Tonight, if we. | 01:28:07 | |
| Are to approve this. | 01:28:09 | |
| We are not then saying OK. | 01:28:11 | |
| Go do this. | 01:28:14 | |
| We're saying this is our first. | 01:28:15 | |
| Step forward. | 01:28:18 | |
| On this process, on this being rezoned to be residential and then sort of the the concept of how this would be developed. | 01:28:20 | |
| Yes, but I want to be clear that the. | 01:28:29 | |
| The approach of adding the conceptual plat stage to our subdivision process. | 01:28:34 | |
| Was so that the Commission and the developer very early on. | 01:28:41 | |
| In the development could get. | 01:28:45 | |
| On board about. | 01:28:48 | |
| Densities, open space, amenities, layouts, roadways, access. So it's kind of a go or no go zone and I think we need to be clear. | 01:28:49 | |
| About, you know, one of the things that we talked about when we were rewriting the subdivision ordinance. | 01:29:01 | |
| Was that it is a worst case scenario? | 01:29:06 | |
| That we come to a final plat. | 01:29:09 | |
| And we have. | 01:29:11 | |
| You know, questions, concerns, right? And we've taken that action. | 01:29:13 | |
| To now insert the conceptual plaque. | 01:29:18 | |
| As a new sort of phase of development that you get that we all get to review. | 01:29:21 | |
| Then also including the preliminary plat. | 01:29:28 | |
| And on the very end, when the final plan comes forward for recording. | 01:29:30 | |
| That doesn't come to this body anymore, that goes straight to council and for recording so. | 01:29:35 | |
| We're trying to front load the process in this conceptual phase to get all these. | 01:29:41 | |
| Kinks out so I think. | 01:29:47 | |
| Part of the discussion is really to. | 01:29:49 | |
| For the Commission and the developer to hear. | 01:29:51 | |
| What will be required in order for you to feel comfortable moving forward at this time? | 01:29:55 | |
| I did want to note we did have 3 written comments that were submitted those. | 01:30:04 | |
| Have been uploaded. | 01:30:09 | |
| So they are part of the record. | 01:30:11 | |
| For these proceedings and one of which I believe the individual was able to attend this meeting in person and also. | 01:30:13 | |
| Give comment. | 01:30:21 | |
| Jamie, do you have maybe it's here and I'm unable to sort it out, but. | 01:30:23 | |
| Of the five parcels. | 01:30:28 | |
| Only one of them is zone. | 01:30:31 | |
| Zoned R5. | 01:30:34 | |
| The rest of them are all C2 if I'm not. | 01:30:35 | |
| I believe. | 01:30:38 | |
| Would that imply that? | 01:30:41 | |
| 4/5 of this is zoned commercial now you got it by acreage or is it? | 01:30:43 | |
| So it looks like. | 01:30:50 | |
| Currently I couldn't tell them in the current zoning. | 01:30:52 | |
| Of the four parcels. | 01:30:58 | |
| In the current zoning, there is a 51 acre parcel that is zoned R5. | 01:30:59 | |
| So that is the townhouse dwelling district. | 01:31:04 | |
| There is a. | 01:31:07 | |
| 16 acre parcel that is zoned commercial. | 01:31:09 | |
| Highway Commercial. | 01:31:13 | |
| There is a 34 acre parcel that is zoned Hwy. commercial. | 01:31:15 | |
| And there is a 56 acre parcel that is owned. The bulk of it is zoned commercial. | 01:31:19 | |
| All right, so we have the idea. | 01:31:30 | |
| When that R5 was resolved, R5. | 01:31:34 | |
| But originally it was. | 01:31:42 | |
| Not at the. | 01:31:44 | |
| Not the top of my head. | 01:31:45 | |
| Yeah, not at the top of my head. | 01:31:47 | |
| All right, so are there. | 01:31:52 | |
| Further questions that the Commission wants to talk about. Do we have questions for the city? | 01:31:55 | |
| Are we ready to look at each one of these request items? | 01:32:00 | |
| I have. No, I don't think we have to look at each other. I've got some questions. OK, go, go ahead 1. | 01:32:06 | |
| You're trying to get more density in your. | 01:32:12 | |
| I don't disagree with that. Right now our one property. | 01:32:16 | |
| Requires a 10,000 square foot lot. | 01:32:21 | |
| So by reducing the lot size, you get more density. | 01:32:25 | |
| I understand that I have no problem with that. | 01:32:29 | |
| I do have a problem with 50 foot wide. | 01:32:31 | |
| Very serious problem. | 01:32:34 | |
| I I can go as low as. | 01:32:37 | |
| I can agree with Lord of 60 foot wildlife. | 01:32:38 | |
| I don't like 5 foot setbacks. | 01:32:41 | |
| I want much set back as I can. | 01:32:44 | |
| A 20 foot set back on the front. | 01:32:46 | |
| Is not good. | 01:32:49 | |
| Because that won't fit a status. | 01:32:51 | |
| Well, true, true. | 01:32:53 | |
| Pickup truck with a trailer hitch. | 01:32:56 | |
| That will fill up a 20 foot set back. | 01:32:58 | |
| In driveway. | 01:33:01 | |
| And this is this is so muffled. So that's so many as I'm giving you. | 01:33:03 | |
| Right up front. | 01:33:08 | |
| On my opinion. | 01:33:10 | |
| Now anybody? | 01:33:12 | |
| I'm ready, OK. | 01:33:16 | |
| Any other comments? | 01:33:20 | |
| All right, so we have 4 rezonings that we need to. | 01:33:23 | |
| Deal with individually. | 01:33:29 | |
| So we're going to then. | 01:33:31 | |
| Look at item number 2, which is a rezoning of parcel 121021. | 01:33:34 | |
| And this is going from a commercial to an R1. | 01:33:41 | |
| Do we have a motion for this item? | 01:33:46 | |
| I'll make a motion to approve it. | 01:33:51 | |
| Right. Do we have a second? | 01:33:53 | |
| I'll second. | 01:33:55 | |
| All those in favor, aye. | 01:33:56 | |
| All right, so that was item 2. Item 3 is again a rezoning. In this case, it's parcel 121. | 01:33:59 | |
| 021B. | 01:34:08 | |
| And this is. | 01:34:10 | |
| From a planned development C2. | 01:34:11 | |
| To an R5. | 01:34:15 | |
| Any discussion? Are we ready for a motion on this item? | 01:34:19 | |
| I'll make the motion. | 01:34:24 | |
| Right. Do we have a second? | 01:34:26 | |
| All right, all those in favor. | 01:34:27 | |
| Aye, all right, that motion carries. | 01:34:30 | |
| Item number 4 again is a rezoning. This is 121021 C and this is going from AC to. | 01:34:33 | |
| Zoning to an R1 zoning. | 01:34:42 | |
| Any discussion or do we have a motion on this item? | 01:34:45 | |
| I'll make a motion to approve. | 01:34:48 | |
| Right second. Second. | 01:34:51 | |
| All those in favor, aye aye. | 01:34:53 | |
| All right, and that leaves us then? | 01:34:56 | |
| Our last rezoning on this item 5. | 01:34:59 | |
| This is for parcel 134029 and this is going from an R. | 01:35:02 | |
| Five to an R1. | 01:35:08 | |
| Do we have a motion? I'll make a motion. | 01:35:11 | |
| All right, second, second. All right. All those in favor. Aye, aye. | 01:35:14 | |
| All right, So those were the rezoning items. And then lastly. | 01:35:19 | |
| We have a request to approve the conceptual. | 01:35:25 | |
| That was provided to us for this subdivision, which includes all of the. | 01:35:29 | |
| Parcels totaling 162. | 01:35:36 | |
| 2 1/2 acres that we just have taken action on rezoning. | 01:35:38 | |
| The proposal includes up to 325. | 01:35:44 | |
| Residential lots. | 01:35:48 | |
| Under the proposed R1 and then we have an R5. | 01:35:50 | |
| Section of this. | 01:35:54 | |
| Property, and again, this is an approval of the conceptual plan. | 01:35:56 | |
| To allow them. | 01:36:01 | |
| To move forward. | 01:36:03 | |
| On this. | 01:36:05 | |
| Do we have a motion on this item? | 01:36:07 | |
| Move to approve. | 01:36:11 | |
| All right, a second. | 01:36:12 | |
| I'll second. | 01:36:15 | |
| All right. | 01:36:17 | |
| Can we please review conditions? Conditions of approach? Yep. | 01:36:20 | |
| Would you like me to take a crack at that? | 01:36:28 | |
| OK, a couple of things that we discussed. | 01:36:33 | |
| Let's start with. | 01:36:39 | |
| A traffic study. | 01:36:42 | |
| A traffic study will be conducted. | 01:36:44 | |
| Prior to the submission of the preliminary plat. | 01:36:48 | |
| And. | 01:36:55 | |
| Recording into the record. | 01:36:56 | |
| Speaking to you and and writing. | 01:36:59 | |
| That's a lot of things to do. | 01:37:02 | |
| A letter of intent. | 01:37:07 | |
| From Georgia dot for. | 01:37:09 | |
| Discussions of a secondary axis. | 01:37:13 | |
| Moving forward, all of the requirements of the preliminary plan will be put forward. | 01:37:33 | |
| This entails. | 01:37:38 | |
| A more detailed landscape plan. | 01:37:41 | |
| I think it would behoove the applicant to. | 01:37:43 | |
| Detail the buffer. | 01:37:46 | |
| Between the sugar mill property and adjacent to. | 01:37:48 | |
| The railway as well as the buffer along Saint Mary's Road. | 01:37:52 | |
| Mr. White, you had mentioned the environmental assessment. | 01:38:10 | |
| As well as the archaeological assessment. | 01:38:15 | |
| If possible, I think that the results of that. | 01:38:18 | |
| Could be shared with the Commission. | 01:38:21 | |
| Staff. | 01:38:35 | |
| Staff will working with the applicant. | 01:38:40 | |
| Review the parking requirements. | 01:38:43 | |
| And try to. | 01:38:47 | |
| Perhaps find additional parking. | 01:38:50 | |
| If. | 01:38:53 | |
| The review should warrant that. | 01:38:54 | |
| That would be part of your standard process, yes. | 01:38:59 | |
| Well. | 01:39:04 | |
| What I can divulge is that the development meets the parking standards. | 01:39:07 | |
| I think the parking standards are where we have challenges. | 01:39:11 | |
| So that will be a collaborative. | 01:39:14 | |
| Discussion if room can be found. | 01:39:17 | |
| Perhaps through? | 01:39:20 | |
| Having some influence on the restrictions and covenants, we can discuss that. | 01:39:24 | |
| The ownership of the roadways there's, I think there's a lot of opportunities there to. | 01:39:30 | |
| Avoid what some of our. | 01:39:36 | |
| Current developments are challenged by with. | 01:39:38 | |
| On street parking. | 01:39:41 | |
| I talked too much on that one so I kind of forgot what I said, but I'm just going to hungry. | 01:39:44 | |
| What's the city analysis of thank you parking parking allocation for? | 01:39:50 | |
| Solutions. | 01:39:56 | |
| As is stated in the preliminary plat application. | 01:40:07 | |
| Part of that is that you will. | 01:40:11 | |
| Provide more detail on your. | 01:40:13 | |
| Open space, Amenity. Recreation space. | 01:40:17 | |
| OK. | 01:40:20 | |
| Last thing that I'll suggest it is. | 01:40:31 | |
| Mr. King. | 01:40:35 | |
| Embedded. | 01:40:36 | |
| The. | 01:40:38 | |
| Meet with the school board. | 01:40:39 | |
| About so I'd like to I'd like to go a little bit beyond the scope of this Commission and just let. | 01:40:41 | |
| Community members know because this is not. | 01:40:48 | |
| This is something that we hear at all of our schools. | 01:40:52 | |
| And they're they're in the old subdivision ordinance there was. | 01:40:56 | |
| As we discussed earlier in the meeting. | 01:41:01 | |
| There was kind of this idea of a footpath. | 01:41:03 | |
| Or some sort of walkway or connection for school aged children. | 01:41:06 | |
| To the school. | 01:41:11 | |
| We've seen that in the Cannon Forest development. We've seen it in the Davis. | 01:41:13 | |
| St. Townhomes that we recently put through. | 01:41:17 | |
| It is up to the school board, which is a county. | 01:41:20 | |
| School board, right? That's not a municipal, it's county. | 01:41:24 | |
| So they have their own set of operating practices. | 01:41:27 | |
| It is up to the school board as to whether or not they want to entertain that connection. | 01:41:30 | |
| As Mr. White said. | 01:41:34 | |
| You would be open to us, you know, reaching out and sharing that. | 01:41:36 | |
| And we're happy to do that and can have that as a. | 01:41:40 | |
| Condition of approval. | 01:41:43 | |
| But I do want to say that the school board is currently working with both the city of all cities, Kingsland, Woodbine and Saint | 01:41:45 | |
| Mary's. | 01:41:49 | |
| To discuss redistricting. | 01:41:54 | |
| Of the school zones. | 01:41:56 | |
| So it is not a given that the children who may be moving into this future development would go to Mary Lee Clark. | 01:41:58 | |
| So I think if if that is something that. | 01:42:06 | |
| Community members are very concerned about. | 01:42:09 | |
| I encourage you to not just engage in our processes, but also in the school board's discussions. | 01:42:14 | |
| OK. | 01:42:24 | |
| Jamie, are you including a second entrance into your? | 01:42:30 | |
| Suggestions. By default I think the traffic study and this letter of intent from Georgia dot for that secondary entrance. | 01:42:33 | |
| Would yield some next steps there. | 01:42:43 | |
| Yeah. | 01:42:48 | |
| All right, so you were. | 01:42:50 | |
| Did I get him special conditions? Have you completed that? | 01:42:53 | |
| Oh yeah, I got one more. | 01:42:59 | |
| I think. | 01:43:02 | |
| Something that we've talked about. | 01:43:04 | |
| In the new subdivision ordinance and that Mister King. | 01:43:06 | |
| Alluded to and I'll bring your attention to this kind of. | 01:43:09 | |
| Preliminary lot landscaping plan. | 01:43:13 | |
| I'd also like the applicant to. | 01:43:17 | |
| Create a bit of a lot key here at the preliminary plat. | 01:43:20 | |
| Scale to show. | 01:43:24 | |
| What is the front yard set back? What is the side yard set back? You know what kind of space? | 01:43:26 | |
| Would be on the on the typical unit. So Mr. King, you'll get. | 01:43:31 | |
| A better sense for. | 01:43:36 | |
| The setbacks that come with the 50 foot. | 01:43:40 | |
| White blood, and I believe that. | 01:43:42 | |
| Wraps up. | 01:43:46 | |
| Yes, OK. | 01:43:55 | |
| So I believe we have a motion. | 01:43:57 | |
| On the table, but we're seeking a second. | 01:44:01 | |
| Before we paused to. | 01:44:05 | |
| Define what the special conditions on that? So can we have a repeat on our? | 01:44:08 | |
| Motion on this one. OK, I move to approve with staff requirements. | 01:44:13 | |
| All right, do we have a second? | 01:44:19 | |
| All right, all those in favor. | 01:44:21 | |
| Aye, all right. | 01:44:24 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:44:26 | |
| All right. So because we amended the agenda and removed the last two items, that covers the items on tonight's agenda. | 01:44:29 | |
| Jamie, do we have any other discussion items or? | 01:44:41 | |
| Things that need to be covered before we adjourn. No, just separate from the Planning Commission this Thursday, the city will be. | 01:44:44 | |
| Hosting a. | 01:44:53 | |
| A development progress report at 5:00 PM here in Council Chambers. | 01:44:56 | |
| Where we'll be discussing the findings of the Midtown RSVP planning process that the. | 01:45:01 | |
| University of Georgia. | 01:45:09 | |
| Has completed. | 01:45:10 | |
| And then at 6:00 PM, there will be a town hall. So feel free to come and. | 01:45:11 | |
| And. | 01:45:16 | |
| Communicate with the Council. | 01:45:18 | |
| And also at the July 21st Council meeting. | 01:45:20 | |
| I'll be leading a working session on blight. | 01:45:25 | |
| And future approaches to blight in the city. | 01:45:29 | |
| And that will be at 5:00 PM. | 01:45:33 | |
| All right. So with that, do we have a motion to adjourn? | 01:45:37 | |
| All right, do we have a second? | 01:45:42 | |
| All those in favor. | 01:45:44 | |
| Session stands adjourned. | 01:45:46 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 01:45:55 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Document list
| Document Name | Document type | |
|---|---|---|
| NVR, Inc Rezoning - Public Response | Other | |
| Disbrow Rezoning (135 037E) | General Document | |
| NVR, Inc - Conceptual Plat (121 021, 121 021B, 121 021C, 134 029) | General Document | |
| NVR, Inc - Rezonings (121 021, 121 021B, 121 021C, 134 029) | General Document |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Fast, so we will all right now. | 00:00:00 | |
| Are you guys ready? | 00:00:03 | |
| OK. | 00:00:05 | |
| I'm going to call to order the July meeting of the Planning Commission. | 00:00:07 | |
| Our first item of business is approval of the minutes from our last month's meeting. | 00:00:12 | |
| Are there edits or additions that need to be made? | 00:00:17 | |
| No, All right. Do we have a motion on approval? | 00:00:23 | |
| Move to approve. Do we have a 2nd I'll second? | 00:00:27 | |
| OK, all those in favour, aye. | 00:00:30 | |
| All right, minutes have been approved. | 00:00:32 | |
| Our next item is approval on the agenda and we do have two changes to the agenda. | 00:00:35 | |
| So this will. | 00:00:42 | |
| Shorten our evening slightly. | 00:00:43 | |
| So item number 7 and item number 8. | 00:00:46 | |
| Have both been withdrawn. | 00:00:49 | |
| So a little shorter of an agenda. | 00:00:52 | |
| Any other additions or edits that? | 00:00:56 | |
| Anyone has for the agenda? | 00:00:59 | |
| All right. Do we have a motion to approve the amended agenda? | 00:01:01 | |
| All right, second, second. | 00:01:05 | |
| All right, all those in favor. | 00:01:08 | |
| All right, we have no old business. | 00:01:10 | |
| So I think we can start right in. | 00:01:14 | |
| New business. | 00:01:16 | |
| So this is tax parcel. | 00:01:18 | |
| 135O37-E. | 00:01:23 | |
| And this is a rezoning from C2 to R5. | 00:01:25 | |
| Do we have a representative for the for the owner of the property? | 00:01:29 | |
| If you want to come forward, if there's anything you want to add or tell us about. | 00:01:33 | |
| The project. | 00:01:38 | |
| If you. Yeah. | 00:01:40 | |
| And if you will, for all anyone who's giving testimony, if you'll give your name and your address before you start your comments. | 00:01:42 | |
| Yeah. Hey, good afternoon, Jonathan Mcdill. | 00:01:47 | |
| 493 Harbor View, Woodbine. | 00:01:55 | |
| It's a little back up a little bit. | 00:01:57 | |
| Um, I'm representing Greg Disbrow on this project. He's the owner of the property. | 00:02:02 | |
| And he's looking to. | 00:02:06 | |
| Rezone the C2 to R5. | 00:02:09 | |
| And here to answer any questions that you may have. | 00:02:12 | |
| I don't know if you want to. | 00:02:15 | |
| If you want me to kind of run through it or if that was OK. | 00:02:17 | |
| So this is off of proposed. | 00:02:21 | |
| Extension of Linda St. | 00:02:24 | |
| That has not happened yet and I think there's some coordination between the two property owners. | 00:02:26 | |
| Umm, to get that done. So this is. | 00:02:31 | |
| That is a part of this. | 00:02:35 | |
| But you can see the property to the West right there. Yep, right behind. | 00:02:38 | |
| What used to be Church's Chicken? Is it fitness? | 00:02:43 | |
| LA Fitness or something? | 00:02:46 | |
| So that property there and then. | 00:02:49 | |
| I believe we had. | 00:02:52 | |
| 12. | 00:02:54 | |
| Units. What was it, 16? | 00:02:58 | |
| We went back and forth a few times. So off the top medical. | 00:03:00 | |
| 1919. | 00:03:05 | |
| With a common space so. | 00:03:07 | |
| I believe we've met. | 00:03:10 | |
| The open space requirements and all that, and I think the R5 gives us the. | 00:03:12 | |
| Density and without. | 00:03:16 | |
| Too many concessions. | 00:03:18 | |
| Try to put a, you know, pretty. | 00:03:20 | |
| Clear Landscape plan on how we're going to meet the tree canopy requirements, how it could be met. | 00:03:23 | |
| So everything. | 00:03:28 | |
| Drains towards the marsh. | 00:03:30 | |
| So drainage should not be any issue once we get the construction plans. | 00:03:33 | |
| On this one. | 00:03:38 | |
| OK, OK, great. | 00:03:41 | |
| And Jamie, I'll turn things over to you for the cities. | 00:03:44 | |
| Presentation Great Thank you, Commissioners and members of the public. | 00:03:47 | |
| Watching and here in person. | 00:03:53 | |
| Before you this evening is. | 00:03:56 | |
| Sorry, I got a lot of papers here. | 00:04:00 | |
| Simple rezoning application of tax parcel ID 135037-E. | 00:04:05 | |
| Mr. Gregory this Brown requests a rezoning of that tax parcel from C2 to R5. | 00:04:11 | |
| So what we're seeing now and what Mr. Macdill just spoke through. | 00:04:18 | |
| The parcel that you're seeing highlighted here, the upland area, is shaded. | 00:04:22 | |
| In red. | 00:04:28 | |
| Um, and. | 00:04:29 | |
| The marsh or what we call kind of conservation area is shaded in green, all part of the same parcel. This is our new ALDI, just to | 00:04:33 | |
| help everybody get situated. | 00:04:38 | |
| Mr. Macdill also referenced a little bit of a. | 00:04:44 | |
| Potentially A partnership between two property owners. | 00:04:47 | |
| Mr. Sawyer, who is in the audience with us. | 00:04:51 | |
| You'll remember brought forward a rezoning application of this parcel just to the east. | 00:04:53 | |
| That parcel fronts both along Charles St. | 00:05:00 | |
| And kind of is where the Linda St. right of way terminates. | 00:05:04 | |
| So in part of. | 00:05:10 | |
| Staff's review of the project. | 00:05:11 | |
| Of this rezoning application. | 00:05:13 | |
| Just want to be clear, this is a rezoning. | 00:05:16 | |
| The applicant has provided us with. | 00:05:19 | |
| What I'm referring to here. | 00:05:22 | |
| As a a site plan, just showing potentially how they may lay things out. | 00:05:25 | |
| The material is very close to a conceptual plaque. | 00:05:32 | |
| But with our new subdivision ordinance. | 00:05:37 | |
| This will have to come back before you. | 00:05:40 | |
| As a conceptual plat application and you'll see a little bit more detail and we'll discuss. | 00:05:43 | |
| You know, open space, amenities, buffers, all that types of stuff, but for now you're looking at the rezoning and this. | 00:05:48 | |
| Site Plan gives you a good indication for the extension. | 00:05:56 | |
| Of Linda St. and how that would then enter the uplands. | 00:06:01 | |
| And would be navigated to allow for. | 00:06:05 | |
| The Townhomes, which is the main dwelling of the R5 townhome dwelling district. | 00:06:08 | |
| OK. | 00:06:15 | |
| Reviewed this application. | 00:06:19 | |
| And we recommend approval. | 00:06:21 | |
| Part of the set of conditions. | 00:06:24 | |
| Is that all future development will adhere to the R5 standards? | 00:06:28 | |
| And that this again is a rezoning application. | 00:06:33 | |
| Which will come back before you as a conceptual plan if you choose to approve it. | 00:06:36 | |
| Because it is indeed a major subdivision, this would be, I think, upwards of 19. | 00:06:41 | |
| Individualized persons, I believe. | 00:06:47 | |
| If I recall right. | 00:06:51 | |
| All that area that it abuts to is all residential already, is that correct? Correct. Yeah, we can have a look at. | 00:06:53 | |
| At the zoning there, yeah, so. | 00:07:00 | |
| All of the area that you're seeing in yellow, so these surroundings. | 00:07:04 | |
| Didn't we just? | 00:07:10 | |
| Approved from across net and R5 Mr. Sawyers property, yeah. | 00:07:12 | |
| Right next to it, right next across the street. | 00:07:19 | |
| All right. Are there any other questions from Commission members before we open this up for public comment? | 00:07:25 | |
| All right, seeing none, I'm going to go ahead and open a public comment on this item. So if you care to give public comment on | 00:07:35 | |
| this item, if you would come forward, give your name and address and then anything you'd like to add to the record on this item. | 00:07:42 | |
| All right. I'm not seeing any movement, so I'm going to go ahead and close the public comment period on this. | 00:07:51 | |
| Any further discussion amongst? | 00:07:59 | |
| Commission members, do we, are we ready for a motion on this item? | 00:08:02 | |
| All right, well, I might make a comment here just and I'm I'm not sure that. | 00:08:07 | |
| I have any real opposition, it seems like an awkward. | 00:08:12 | |
| Location for a higher density residential. | 00:08:16 | |
| Development. | 00:08:19 | |
| Being right behind the. | 00:08:20 | |
| Commercial zoning, that's now the Aldi's out there. I mean, it would be a logical extension from. | 00:08:22 | |
| That site if it had common ownership. | 00:08:27 | |
| But being. | 00:08:30 | |
| I guess. | 00:08:32 | |
| At least two streets off of. | 00:08:34 | |
| Spur 40. | 00:08:36 | |
| It just without any other higher density residential around except. | 00:08:37 | |
| For the. | 00:08:42 | |
| Site across the street that he just referenced. It seems awkward. | 00:08:42 | |
| It just it just seems like there'd be a better location for a high density residential. | 00:08:50 | |
| Site then. | 00:08:55 | |
| Behind the shopping center. | 00:08:57 | |
| Just an opinion. | 00:09:00 | |
| And I think we talked with the. | 00:09:05 | |
| Mr. Sawyer's proposal on this. | 00:09:07 | |
| About. | 00:09:10 | |
| Access umm. | 00:09:11 | |
| On the pathway. | 00:09:13 | |
| So I mean there, there may be some. | 00:09:14 | |
| Plus. | 00:09:17 | |
| For. | 00:09:18 | |
| Walkable access to. | 00:09:20 | |
| The amenities that. | 00:09:22 | |
| Are in that Plaza. | 00:09:24 | |
| If I remember correctly when we did it. | 00:09:27 | |
| Approve the previous one. | 00:09:29 | |
| Isn't fairly heavily. | 00:09:31 | |
| Wooded between. | 00:09:32 | |
| Now it's all these. | 00:09:35 | |
| And where this would be? | 00:09:36 | |
| At the point where you can't. | 00:09:39 | |
| Can you even see the back of the ALDI location? | 00:09:41 | |
| I remember sitting in a car and I don't think you can. | 00:09:45 | |
| But maybe I'm maybe I'm wrong on my memory. | 00:09:48 | |
| I'm not hearing you. What? Well. | 00:09:51 | |
| When we approved the one previously that you spoke of? | 00:09:55 | |
| I think I remember driving back in there. | 00:09:59 | |
| And when you end up in the end of the street where this would be. | 00:10:02 | |
| You can't even see all these because the vegetation is so strong. | 00:10:06 | |
| I don't know if that would be torn down or if it would remain there. | 00:10:10 | |
| I believe this is further down from where all these, but no, I'm kind of answering what Matt? | 00:10:15 | |
| This question was I don't, I think it's. | 00:10:20 | |
| Blacked off from a. | 00:10:23 | |
| From at least a view standpoint. | 00:10:25 | |
| By a fairly heavy vegetation. | 00:10:29 | |
| Now whether that would stand or not, I don't know if that's. | 00:10:31 | |
| The plan is to tear it down. | 00:10:34 | |
| I don't know why you'd want to, because then you'd be looking at the back of a shopping center. | 00:10:36 | |
| So I think it's it's important to look at the map as shown now can show you some of the existing conditions on the site. I don't | 00:10:41 | |
| know why that pops up right there, but. | 00:10:46 | |
| Here's where the parcel, the subject parcel. | 00:10:52 | |
| Abuts the other commercial parcels and so I do think that. | 00:10:55 | |
| When we see the conceptual plat. | 00:11:00 | |
| We do have buffer requirements. | 00:11:02 | |
| And so there's there's an indication. | 00:11:05 | |
| In this site plan of potential buffering between. | 00:11:09 | |
| The existing commercial development and the proposed. | 00:11:15 | |
| Housing. | 00:11:19 | |
| And that is something that you would see if this were to move forward. | 00:11:20 | |
| But just as you see now. | 00:11:24 | |
| There's really not. You can, you can kind of see right through there. That's why I couldn't determine where I was, where I was | 00:11:27 | |
| previously, yeah. | 00:11:31 | |
| You were over here, although as as it is now commercial. | 00:11:36 | |
| It has very low visibility to Hwy. 40. It's sort of stuck way in the back there and wouldn't be a prime commercial site because | 00:11:41 | |
| you wouldn't see what was there easily. | 00:11:47 | |
| On Hwy. On Hwy. 40. | 00:11:53 | |
| Coming east. | 00:11:57 | |
| You would notice it. | 00:12:00 | |
| Before we started on the curve. | 00:12:02 | |
| Crossing the Creek. | 00:12:04 | |
| So while you're saying the viewshed traveling this way, you would. | 00:12:08 | |
| Well, the trees would obviously have to be removed to develop the site. You should have both. | 00:12:14 | |
| Yeah, talking about that. | 00:12:19 | |
| RJ Dark side of a red clay site. | 00:12:22 | |
| That's part of it. | 00:12:26 | |
| Or male with is marsh. | 00:12:27 | |
| Trees and male I was over in. | 00:12:31 | |
| What's the move the arrow just a little bit toward Aldi's? | 00:12:36 | |
| Yeah, not not that far. | 00:12:40 | |
| The first square there. | 00:12:43 | |
| The first square there. | 00:12:45 | |
| This one here no come back. This one here, come down right there building. | 00:12:47 | |
| Is that the fitness center? I believe so, yeah. This is the tobacco palace or something. | 00:12:55 | |
| So easy access to exercise and cigarettes. | 00:13:03 | |
| Yeah, perfect. | 00:13:06 | |
| I mean as we, as we did negotiate with Mr. Sawyer, I mean I think a footpath but also a buffer sort of area and landscape that | 00:13:08 | |
| would provide. | 00:13:13 | |
| Both noise attenuation, privacy, security, beautification. | 00:13:17 | |
| But also access I think could be. | 00:13:22 | |
| But he's still got to come back for what? A concessional plan? | 00:13:25 | |
| All right, move to approve based on the. | 00:13:30 | |
| Presentation made and the suggestions from. | 00:13:33 | |
| OK. You folks, do we have a second for that? | 00:13:38 | |
| What would you want to repeat that? | 00:13:42 | |
| Move to approve. | 00:13:45 | |
| Based on. | 00:13:47 | |
| The government from staff, correct? | 00:13:49 | |
| All those in favor, aye. | 00:13:53 | |
| All right, now we have. | 00:13:56 | |
| Five additional. | 00:14:01 | |
| Items that are all related. | 00:14:03 | |
| So we will be taking as the Planning Commission because we have. | 00:14:06 | |
| Five different items that need to have action. | 00:14:10 | |
| Will be separately taking action, but I think we can discuss these as one. | 00:14:13 | |
| Project and then at the conclusion of that so. | 00:14:19 | |
| What's proposed is for rezoning. | 00:14:23 | |
| Actions and then one conceptual plan on that. | 00:14:26 | |
| Do we have a representative from the project if you want to? | 00:14:31 | |
| Come forward, I believe you have a presentation you want to share. | 00:14:34 | |
| And if you'll give your name and address? Yes, thank you. Jeff White, 226 Woodsong Lane in Saint Augustine. | 00:14:39 | |
| I am a representative from Ryan Holmes. | 00:14:47 | |
| And. | 00:14:50 | |
| Thank you. That's. | 00:15:03 | |
| A little less invasive than my dentist. That's not as good. | 00:15:05 | |
| Is that better? | 00:15:11 | |
| That OK, That's a little bit OK. Thank you. | 00:15:12 | |
| I'm hearing impaired. I'll let you know. Thank you. | 00:15:15 | |
| I am here as a representative of Ryan Holmes. | 00:15:19 | |
| Which is our marketing name for NVR Incorporated. | 00:15:23 | |
| We are a national home builder and we're very interested and we love your city. | 00:15:27 | |
| We are here today to talk about Oscar Oaks is what we are calling this property. It's four separate parcels. | 00:15:35 | |
| Totaling 162. | 00:15:42 | |
| And a half acres. | 00:15:45 | |
| The subject property is located on the east side of Saint Mary's Rd. north of Hwy. 40. | 00:15:48 | |
| We are asking for rezoning of each of the four parcels. | 00:15:53 | |
| In order to construct a community consisting of 179. | 00:15:57 | |
| 50 foot lots. | 00:16:01 | |
| And 100 and 4632 foot. | 00:16:03 | |
| Lots that will contain duplexes. | 00:16:06 | |
| The community will include amenities. | 00:16:09 | |
| Like a pool, clubhouse and a playground. | 00:16:12 | |
| It will also include interconnectivity. | 00:16:16 | |
| With golf cart, biking and walking paths. | 00:16:19 | |
| And we have tried to design this to minimize wetland impact and preserve as much. | 00:16:22 | |
| Wooded area as possible. | 00:16:27 | |
| A little history about our company. 1 next one, Jamie. | 00:16:30 | |
| We were started in 1948. | 00:16:37 | |
| We operate in 15 states. We are. | 00:16:39 | |
| Currently the 4th largest home builder. | 00:16:44 | |
| In the country. | 00:16:46 | |
| And. | 00:16:48 | |
| We I only say that is that we have a reputation uphold. | 00:16:49 | |
| And we are not interested. | 00:16:55 | |
| A fly by night operation. We want to do business with the City of Saint Mary's. | 00:16:58 | |
| And have a relationship going forward. | 00:17:03 | |
| And have a community that. | 00:17:06 | |
| Not only us, but the city can be proud of. | 00:17:08 | |
| Next please. | 00:17:11 | |
| Going out even through 2008, through the Great Depression, we were one of the few home builders who. | 00:17:13 | |
| State not just stayed afloat, but was profitable. | 00:17:20 | |
| And we grew in market share and and I think that was a testament to our. | 00:17:23 | |
| Product and our discipline and what we try to bring to the table to bring a good quality product to everybody. | 00:17:28 | |
| Next please. | 00:17:35 | |
| Here is our current site plan that we are showing what we'd like to build. | 00:17:37 | |
| The white areas are the homes. | 00:17:43 | |
| The dark green areas are wooded areas. | 00:17:45 | |
| We've also considered in there showing our ponds. | 00:17:50 | |
| For proper retention. | 00:17:53 | |
| And the light green areas is where we could potentially have open. | 00:17:55 | |
| Recreation or park space? | 00:18:00 | |
| But we would need further approvals. | 00:18:03 | |
| For wetland impacts and things from FEMA, so we don't know for sure, but it is. It is, but could potentially be done. Either way, | 00:18:05 | |
| there will not be a home built on those areas. | 00:18:10 | |
| Access would be off the Mickel road right away. Alignment. | 00:18:14 | |
| We would not. | 00:18:18 | |
| Affect any of the existing drainage easements. | 00:18:20 | |
| And but we would also need to know that we would need not just FEMA approval, but also G dot approval. | 00:18:23 | |
| For our access, but this is conceptually what we would be looking at. | 00:18:30 | |
| Next, to give you an idea, this next one, this is one of our existing communities and this would be. | 00:18:34 | |
| Fairly similar to kind of what we. | 00:18:40 | |
| What our philosophy is. | 00:18:42 | |
| We do have. | 00:18:44 | |
| And this one is a local. It's a. | 00:18:46 | |
| Jacksonville Project. As you can see, we tried to do our best to preserve as much wooded area, even between the ponds. | 00:18:49 | |
| Preserve the wooded areas as much as possible. We know that brings a lot to the community. | 00:18:56 | |
| And quite frankly, it helps us in in selling the homes, which is what our goal is here so. | 00:19:02 | |
| I think we have kind of the same alignment in goals and what we want to try and do. | 00:19:08 | |
| The next slide. | 00:19:13 | |
| Shows what we would perceive to be the right of way within the community, within the neighborhood. | 00:19:15 | |
| To help give us, you know, the interconnectivity. | 00:19:21 | |
| We would provide a bike or golf cart path. | 00:19:25 | |
| Separate from a pedestrian walkway, there would also be St. landscaping. | 00:19:29 | |
| That we will have in there so we. | 00:19:34 | |
| Think it will help provide that interconnectivity but also beautify the whole area. | 00:19:38 | |
| Next slide will show. | 00:19:45 | |
| Kind of our inner what each individual lot would look like and this is a typical. | 00:19:47 | |
| Landscape plan that we have. | 00:19:53 | |
| We want to make sure that we have landscaping around the foundation. | 00:19:55 | |
| Shade Trees. St. Trees. | 00:20:01 | |
| And all this will be done as part of a professionally managed homeowners association, because we want to make sure that. | 00:20:04 | |
| This community keeps up the standards and looks. | 00:20:11 | |
| The way it did when it opened. | 00:20:16 | |
| In perpetuity, long after we're gone. | 00:20:18 | |
| So it'll be professionally managed. | 00:20:20 | |
| The next slide shows. | 00:20:23 | |
| What we perceive or what we've kind of conceptually done as a landscape, as a monument, would have landscape around it at the | 00:20:26 | |
| entrance to the community. | 00:20:30 | |
| Pronouncing that to the for all the residents there. | 00:20:35 | |
| As far as the amenity goes, the next few slides show just some examples of things we've done in the past. | 00:20:40 | |
| This we haven't been able to design yet what the amenity would look like. | 00:20:47 | |
| However, this would be. | 00:20:52 | |
| What we would be considered to be the minimum? | 00:20:55 | |
| A pool that would be the appropriate size for the number of residents. | 00:20:58 | |
| A clubhouse with restrooms. | 00:21:02 | |
| And they and some shade space. Also there would be a playground which may be adjacent to the pool or it might be in another part | 00:21:04 | |
| in the community. | 00:21:08 | |
| But that would be our. | 00:21:13 | |
| Our minimum you can go to the next one. Jamie shows the same one. | 00:21:14 | |
| But we would make sure again, it's appropriately sized. | 00:21:19 | |
| For the size of the community, we don't want to have a pool that's too small for the number of residents. | 00:21:22 | |
| Next one if you don't mind. | 00:21:30 | |
| Thank you. | 00:21:32 | |
| We don't know again if the size will allow, but if possible. | 00:21:33 | |
| We know As for us as home builders. | 00:21:37 | |
| The amenities add so much to the community and it's a. | 00:21:41 | |
| It's a well made investment on our part to do as best as we can, so if it allows we would. | 00:21:44 | |
| Have things like dog parks. | 00:21:51 | |
| Pickleball courts. | 00:21:53 | |
| Maybe a bigger pool you know will have the the furniture and everything appropriate we want to make it. | 00:21:55 | |
| Attractive to potential home buyers and we feel like that's a good investment for. | 00:22:01 | |
| For us and it helps. | 00:22:05 | |
| Again, with the with the community as a whole. | 00:22:06 | |
| To give you an idea of the homes, these are some of them that we've looked at. | 00:22:10 | |
| That we would that we build here in the in the region. | 00:22:14 | |
| Here's some examples of what would be built on the 50 foot lots. They could be one or two-story. They'd be between 3:00 to 5:00 | 00:22:19 | |
| bedrooms. | 00:22:23 | |
| An average sale price would probably be in the low to mid three hundreds for for these ones. | 00:22:27 | |
| And then a couple more examples of some other ones. | 00:22:34 | |
| Same things, maybe some smaller 3 bedroom homes we feel like it applies to. | 00:22:37 | |
| Families, but also maybe folks who are downsizing. | 00:22:42 | |
| We'd have a variety of those again on the 50 foot lots. | 00:22:46 | |
| Our next product. | 00:22:51 | |
| This would be what we're we're referring to as our duplex villa. | 00:22:52 | |
| Product. This is something that is brand new that we've just created specifically for this community. | 00:22:56 | |
| So it is an attached housing. | 00:23:03 | |
| With us 24 foot eat this is 2 units, each one is 24 feet wide. | 00:23:06 | |
| That would give you an 8 on a 32 foot wide set back. | 00:23:11 | |
| That would give you 8 more feet or 16 feet between each building. | 00:23:15 | |
| So even though these are attached housing, we want people to have that would. | 00:23:20 | |
| Potentially being a price point for maybe some folks who. | 00:23:25 | |
| Could be more affordable. | 00:23:28 | |
| But would also give the feel as you're driving through down the street. | 00:23:30 | |
| It feels like you're in a single family community where it's not these giant. | 00:23:34 | |
| Clusters of buildings. | 00:23:38 | |
| Duplex. | 00:23:40 | |
| With a space in between to the next duplex and it kind of gives you that same sort of feel of being in a in a single family | 00:23:42 | |
| detached community, but providing it at a price point that would be. | 00:23:47 | |
| Affordable for some other folks. | 00:23:52 | |
| This is the existing zoning we're here to ask today for, for zoning each of the four zonings. | 00:23:56 | |
| Is well, R5 is the furthest north. | 00:24:03 | |
| And really what we're asking is for we would love and the others are all zoned commercial. | 00:24:06 | |
| And really what we're asking is that the R5 just be switched to the southern portion. | 00:24:11 | |
| And then everything else be downsized down, zoned from commercial to residential to R1. | 00:24:18 | |
| So, umm. | 00:24:24 | |
| Net across the board, we're really asking for just to relocate the R5 that's already exists there. | 00:24:26 | |
| And that it would be and to give us what we would want for. | 00:24:33 | |
| To get. | 00:24:37 | |
| The R1 zoning for what is now currently commercial. | 00:24:39 | |
| The next slide. | 00:24:44 | |
| Would show we would of how we would do that and be able to accomplish that with our proposed zoning. I know it's kind of hard to | 00:24:46 | |
| read on there. | 00:24:50 | |
| But we feel like if you look at some of the adjacent uses to this project, you know you have the sugar mill development. | 00:24:55 | |
| To the east. | 00:25:03 | |
| There is and there will be some higher proposed, some proposed higher density projects that are going to the West into the north. | 00:25:05 | |
| We feel that. | 00:25:12 | |
| This is a good transition between those and we feel like it would it would fit well in the community. | 00:25:13 | |
| And would uh, uh. | 00:25:20 | |
| Be that transition piece and and and fit well for future growth that is planned for in the community as well. | 00:25:22 | |
| So, umm. | 00:25:28 | |
| Thank you. Any questions? | 00:25:29 | |
| I think it might be helpful. | 00:25:32 | |
| I know, I looked. | 00:25:34 | |
| As I was looking over this. | 00:25:36 | |
| I had some. | 00:25:37 | |
| Question about. | 00:25:39 | |
| Traffic and the fact that there's one. | 00:25:41 | |
| Exit and entrance for that and I wondered if you could talk about the process for that. | 00:25:44 | |
| And I believe in our recommendations. | 00:25:49 | |
| There's some language about. | 00:25:52 | |
| Not only a review. | 00:25:55 | |
| Traffic, but the potential of. | 00:25:57 | |
| Needing to ask for additional. | 00:25:59 | |
| Access points, yes, thank you. We, we, we have considered that and we are. | 00:26:01 | |
| Open to that we have asked for and we will do as part of our engineering. When we get into our construction drawings, we'll have a | 00:26:07 | |
| traffic engineer who will provide those studies and will help us to understand and and know that. | 00:26:13 | |
| Where our site plan does show. | 00:26:18 | |
| If you can Scroll down slightly, Jamie. | 00:26:22 | |
| There is an emergency access coming out from the South end there that connects. That would be an emergency access we're also | 00:26:25 | |
| showing. | 00:26:29 | |
| Yep, there and then at the top there is a second access. | 00:26:34 | |
| Coming out. | 00:26:39 | |
| That was, you know, furthest to the north there, however. | 00:26:40 | |
| We're kind of reluctant on committing to anything because we have we really have to get G dots because of. | 00:26:46 | |
| Of Saint Mary's Road being under G dots. | 00:26:51 | |
| Jurisdiction, we're going to need to get their permission and we have not made that application yet. We would like to get our | 00:26:54 | |
| zoning and site plan approved. | 00:26:57 | |
| Before we get to that. | 00:27:01 | |
| Phase, but we are certainly. | 00:27:03 | |
| There's no bigger complaint about any community than traffic, and there's nothing that will kill our sales faster than traffic, so | 00:27:05 | |
| we're sensitive to that. | 00:27:09 | |
| And then the second question I have, and I know I'm holding Jamie up from the city's presentation on this, I, I wouldn't guess | 00:27:13 | |
| we're going to have questions for you. | 00:27:17 | |
| About screening. | 00:27:21 | |
| And buffer zone and so it might be helpful if you talked about that. | 00:27:23 | |
| Yeah, Yes, we, we have gone through a few iterations of this site plan and with the comments from the city, you know, we've talked | 00:27:29 | |
| about that with having minimum buffer zones and we feel like we've we've met those requirements. | 00:27:34 | |
| And it brought that in and and we understand that would be a condition. | 00:27:40 | |
| Of our final site plan approval and and we feel like we've met those. | 00:27:44 | |
| So, for instance, I think we have some folks in the room who live on the other side. | 00:27:48 | |
| Of the railroad tracks. | 00:27:54 | |
| And it might be helpful for them to understand what's proposed in that area. You bet. Maybe Can I turn some time over? Jonathan | 00:27:56 | |
| Macdill is our engineer of record with this and he can probably speak to that to maybe a little better if I can. | 00:28:02 | |
| Jonathan. | 00:28:08 | |
| Jonathan McGill, 493 Harborview. | 00:28:11 | |
| Umm, yeah. So if you you kind of, there's kind of. | 00:28:13 | |
| Broken up into two. | 00:28:17 | |
| Two sections on the development. | 00:28:19 | |
| Jeff just kind of went through. There's a residential single family. | 00:28:22 | |
| Detached and. | 00:28:25 | |
| And attached. | 00:28:27 | |
| So on the southern part of the development. | 00:28:29 | |
| Jim, if you don't mind, can you zoom in? | 00:28:32 | |
| On kind of the. | 00:28:34 | |
| Bottom uh. | 00:28:35 | |
| Up against the railroad. | 00:28:36 | |
| OK, so right here we have a 30 foot buffer. | 00:28:38 | |
| Off of the property line. | 00:28:41 | |
| Plus the railroad. | 00:28:43 | |
| So there's, it probably doesn't look like much there, but there's a good bit of space that and that that's intended to stay | 00:28:45 | |
| natural. | 00:28:48 | |
| So there's a 30 foot buffer there. | 00:28:52 | |
| That's the Titus it's they're going to get. | 00:28:55 | |
| The there's the city adopted with the new. | 00:28:57 | |
| Ordinance. | 00:29:01 | |
| A 50 foot buffer off a major Rd. | 00:29:02 | |
| So the. | 00:29:04 | |
| Part to the northwest. | 00:29:06 | |
| Is the only location right up there to the top left? | 00:29:08 | |
| So you see that strip of property between the property line of the back of those lots. | 00:29:13 | |
| That is 50 foot. | 00:29:18 | |
| And everything else. | 00:29:20 | |
| You know, South of that. | 00:29:22 | |
| Is actually better. | 00:29:24 | |
| Because of the wetlands and other things we had to work around. | 00:29:25 | |
| Umm, then if you go from the Minkler right of way north on the railroad track. | 00:29:28 | |
| There is a G dot easement. | 00:29:35 | |
| Drainage easement and I believe it's 100 foot. | 00:29:37 | |
| There's a there's a berm, there's a swell and there's a berm. | 00:29:40 | |
| Essentially they dug the swell through the dirt up and it created a berm. | 00:29:43 | |
| We're outside of the existing berm. | 00:29:48 | |
| So on the northern part from Menkler North. | 00:29:51 | |
| There's actually going to be. | 00:29:55 | |
| A natural burn that's there that will probably remain. | 00:29:57 | |
| But. | 00:30:01 | |
| It will definitely you know is intended to stay. | 00:30:02 | |
| Vegetative buffer. | 00:30:05 | |
| And we'll, we'll definitely be working with. | 00:30:07 | |
| Staff to ensure that we're meeting all the buffer requirements as we. | 00:30:09 | |
| Work through the construction plans. | 00:30:12 | |
| Great. Thank you. | 00:30:14 | |
| Jamie, I've delayed you. | 00:30:17 | |
| All right. | 00:30:29 | |
| Can you hear me? | 00:30:30 | |
| Mr. King, OK. | 00:30:31 | |
| So a couple of just to lay it all out for those who might be listening before the Commission this evening, and I think a good way | 00:30:33 | |
| to look at it. | 00:30:38 | |
| Is to go to our zoning map. | 00:30:43 | |
| There we go. | 00:30:50 | |
| So, as Mr. White and Mr. Macdill discussed. | 00:30:52 | |
| There are actually 4 parcels in discussion right now and I'm. | 00:30:56 | |
| Highlighting them now. | 00:31:01 | |
| So we talked about the interchange that gets onto Hwy. 40 off of Saint Mary's Road. | 00:31:03 | |
| And as we continue N these are the parcels. | 00:31:09 | |
| On the eastern side. | 00:31:12 | |
| So before the Commission this evening are 4 rezonings. | 00:31:14 | |
| For tax parcel 121021. | 00:31:19 | |
| The request is from C2 to R1. | 00:31:23 | |
| For tax parcel 121021B. | 00:31:27 | |
| The request is from. | 00:31:30 | |
| C2 to R5. | 00:31:32 | |
| For text Parcel 121021. | 00:31:34 | |
| The request is for C2 to R1. | 00:31:38 | |
| And for tax parcel 134029. | 00:31:41 | |
| From R5 to R1. | 00:31:44 | |
| Accompanying this rezoning application. | 00:31:47 | |
| Is a conceptual plan for a major subdivision. | 00:31:50 | |
| So this is our first. | 00:31:54 | |
| Application under our new. | 00:31:57 | |
| Subdivision Ordinance. | 00:31:59 | |
| And I want to take the time right now to thank my staff. | 00:32:01 | |
| And the development community and the Commission and the Council. | 00:32:05 | |
| For the incredibly hard work that happened to overhaul our subdivision ordinance to get us to the point where. | 00:32:09 | |
| Staff does believe that what is being proposed. | 00:32:17 | |
| Within this development. | 00:32:21 | |
| Sorry if I can get to it. | 00:32:23 | |
| Is indeed. | 00:32:25 | |
| We think. | 00:32:27 | |
| Closer to what the Commission had envisioned. | 00:32:28 | |
| Within a major subdivision application. | 00:32:33 | |
| So, you know, just to take a little bit of time here for. | 00:32:37 | |
| The public one thing that was not. | 00:32:41 | |
| Discussed, but I do want to take the time to walk through it. | 00:32:44 | |
| Is the application is applying for our residential density bonus? | 00:32:47 | |
| So one of the things that we did in our subdivision ordinance when it was rewritten. | 00:32:53 | |
| Is we made the starting point. | 00:32:57 | |
| The R1 or single family residential. | 00:33:00 | |
| Zoning, which has a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. | 00:33:04 | |
| And a lot width of 75 feet. | 00:33:09 | |
| What we did in the subdivision ordinance is we allowed. | 00:33:11 | |
| A developer to come in with. | 00:33:16 | |
| To meet a certain set of criteria, like a a Chinese menu if you will, of things that can be done in order to increase density | 00:33:19 | |
| beyond. | 00:33:25 | |
| The sort of what you could get on the lot with 75 foot wide lots at 10,000 square feet. | 00:33:30 | |
| So, as Mr. White explained. | 00:33:36 | |
| You're going to see two different lot sizes here the the duplex lot size. | 00:33:38 | |
| As well as the single family home lot size. | 00:33:43 | |
| The Commission in your packet, you have sort of a breakdown of the residential density bonus and how the applicant has gotten | 00:33:47 | |
| there. | 00:33:51 | |
| And that was a that was a tough process for us to work through because this was our first kind of application. So the engineer of | 00:33:57 | |
| record laid out what could go on the site with the. | 00:34:02 | |
| Standard R1 zoning lot sizes. | 00:34:08 | |
| And then we worked kind of in an iterative way to say, OK. | 00:34:11 | |
| We've met all of the amenity space, we've met all the open space. Now if we give more open space. | 00:34:16 | |
| We can get that density multiplier of 0.3. | 00:34:23 | |
| If we don't mitigate a significant amount of wetlands, we can get an additional density multiplier of 0.3. | 00:34:26 | |
| So if you're following my guerrilla math a little bit. | 00:34:33 | |
| As you get that multiplier, the idea is that you are able to, through additional amenities that you're offering the community, | 00:34:37 | |
| you're able to reduce your lot with and your. | 00:34:43 | |
| Overall lot size. So that's kind of how this development came to be. | 00:34:50 | |
| So to take a little bit of time to kind of address. | 00:34:54 | |
| Some of the key areas. | 00:34:58 | |
| You know if the Commission should choose to move forward and the approval of this rezoning and conceptual plan. | 00:35:01 | |
| The rezoning and the conceptual plat will move forward to council. | 00:35:09 | |
| If that is approved, the applicant will come back with a preliminary plat application. | 00:35:13 | |
| The preliminary plat will give us. | 00:35:20 | |
| A little bit more detail on the landscaping, it'll give us more detail on the amenity spaces. | 00:35:22 | |
| Staff also recommends. | 00:35:28 | |
| That if we choose to approve a condition of approval. | 00:35:30 | |
| Would be that before the preliminary plant there is a traffic study? | 00:35:34 | |
| And in addition to that, there is a letter of intent. | 00:35:41 | |
| From Georgia, dot. So those are kind of two conditions that we're putting forward. | 00:35:44 | |
| OK, let's discuss a little bit more sort of the nuts and bolts. | 00:35:50 | |
| Of the open space. | 00:35:55 | |
| In the amenity spaces. | 00:35:57 | |
| So, as Mr. White explained, one of the things that we talked quite a bit about was how you could show some connectivity within the | 00:36:03 | |
| community. So you saw the kind of key plan. | 00:36:09 | |
| Of uh. | 00:36:16 | |
| The right of way. | 00:36:17 | |
| Which will have an identified. | 00:36:19 | |
| Bicycle path or golf cart path? | 00:36:22 | |
| In addition to the vehicle path. So the proposal is for. | 00:36:25 | |
| A St. width that is about 28 feet. | 00:36:30 | |
| Typically what's required is 24 feet, so these roads will be a little bit wider. | 00:36:34 | |
| In addition to that, there will be a sidewalk. | 00:36:39 | |
| And those paths are proposed. | 00:36:42 | |
| Sorry, just give it a minute here. | 00:36:47 | |
| To kind of meander and connect. | 00:36:50 | |
| Throughout the entire development. | 00:36:52 | |
| So Mr. White can speak more to these potential paths, but you'll see. | 00:36:54 | |
| All right. For example here a path that is connecting in and around and going back to the sidewalks. So really giving an | 00:37:00 | |
| opportunity both. | 00:37:05 | |
| Road and off road. | 00:37:11 | |
| As we discussed. | 00:37:14 | |
| The new subdivision ordinance requires A50 foot set back. | 00:37:16 | |
| Off of the OR a development buffer off of major roadway like Saint Mary's Road, so. | 00:37:20 | |
| Essentially from the street. | 00:37:27 | |
| You won't really be seeing. | 00:37:29 | |
| The residential development other than the sign. | 00:37:31 | |
| As was also discussed. | 00:37:35 | |
| The subdivision ordinance does require. | 00:37:37 | |
| A minimum of a 25 foot buffer, kind of around the edges of the development. | 00:37:39 | |
| And. | 00:37:46 | |
| It can be further detailed. | 00:37:48 | |
| With the preliminary plat application. | 00:37:50 | |
| As we're seeing here. | 00:37:53 | |
| If this is the identified property line, this kind of darker boulder line, there is a 30 foot set back. There's a path that is | 00:37:56 | |
| here but also. | 00:38:01 | |
| To the east of the property is the rail railroad. | 00:38:06 | |
| In that easement as well. | 00:38:10 | |
| So I think this will be a well buffered site. | 00:38:12 | |
| Staff has reviewed. We spent an extensive amount of time working on this application and reviewing it with the applicant. | 00:38:16 | |
| We do recommend approval. | 00:38:23 | |
| With those conditions that we put forward. | 00:38:25 | |
| Requiring a traffic study. | 00:38:28 | |
| Conducted preliminary prior to the preliminary plat application. | 00:38:31 | |
| Bringing forward a more detailed landscape plan as part of the preliminary plan. | 00:38:36 | |
| More detail on the potential amenity spaces. | 00:38:40 | |
| And again, outreach to Georgia dot about those access points. | 00:38:43 | |
| I have a question are we going to address. | 00:38:49 | |
| First the rezoning and then are we going to have another discussion on the proposed? | 00:38:51 | |
| So I think it meant I think the best. | 00:38:59 | |
| Because I have a lot of questions about the proposed development. | 00:39:02 | |
| That and I don't I thought it might be better to bring it up later on when we get down to that. What I suggested was that we. | 00:39:05 | |
| As far as? | 00:39:13 | |
| Commission and the public on the comment period. | 00:39:14 | |
| Cover all of it and then we'll take separate action for each one of these. But I mean are we doing all 5 including the we are so | 00:39:18 | |
| the subdivision application too. So we should bring our questions up now, okay. | 00:39:25 | |
| And that I think that will also help the public on the public comment end of things. | 00:39:32 | |
| Kind of understand. | 00:39:38 | |
| As you're getting your thoughts and ideas together. | 00:39:43 | |
| I just want to go over again. | 00:39:47 | |
| Sort of the new subdivision, the open space and recreational area requirements. | 00:39:49 | |
| So for a site containing residential, single family or townhomes would need to provide 15% of the developable land for open space | 00:39:54 | |
| that has been done. That's the kind of minimum requirement. | 00:40:01 | |
| In addition to that. | 00:40:08 | |
| A residential subdivision greater than 25 units will need to provide 300 square feet of passive and active recreation space per | 00:40:10 | |
| unit. | 00:40:14 | |
| That has been provided so the way that the residential density bonus works. | 00:40:19 | |
| Is that what the applicant has done? | 00:40:24 | |
| Is they've selected from those density bonus kind of menu items, if you will? | 00:40:27 | |
| So there are amenities beyond the minimum open and recreational space. | 00:40:32 | |
| That have been provided up to two times the amount of required open space. | 00:40:38 | |
| There's a preservation of significant natural features such as. | 00:40:43 | |
| The non mitigated wetlands This site actually has quite a few wetlands. | 00:40:47 | |
| And then sort of the proposal for decorative plazas. | 00:40:52 | |
| And the like throughout the development. | 00:40:56 | |
| So again. | 00:40:58 | |
| The applicant is seeking. | 00:41:00 | |
| Density multiplier of .5. | 00:41:02 | |
| Beyond the. | 00:41:05 | |
| The standard R1 zoning. | 00:41:08 | |
| And they've added two Staffs review. | 00:41:10 | |
| At least enough additional. | 00:41:15 | |
| Amenities for a .6. | 00:41:17 | |
| OK. And I would just add, I mean, I think what we've been working on. | 00:41:20 | |
| Diligently on this we've had a lot of. | 00:41:24 | |
| Prior subdivision and particularly. | 00:41:27 | |
| Planned development that we're pushing for as much density. | 00:41:31 | |
| As they could get and I think. | 00:41:35 | |
| The public. | 00:41:38 | |
| And members of this Commission. | 00:41:39 | |
| That wasn't really what we wanted to see in the community. | 00:41:42 | |
| And this site plan that you're seeing looks very different. | 00:41:45 | |
| Than what the majority of the proposals that have come? | 00:41:50 | |
| To us in the past. | 00:41:54 | |
| In recent past and and I think that's because of the work that was. | 00:41:56 | |
| Done on this. | 00:42:00 | |
| It's nice to see the first example. | 00:42:02 | |
| I know it feels good, right? | 00:42:05 | |
| That's a lot of work. | 00:42:07 | |
| Jamie, can you remind me? | 00:42:09 | |
| I know. | 00:42:11 | |
| We had a lot of back and forth in the past and I don't know what the final, I don't recall what the final language is. | 00:42:12 | |
| With this question about we have setbacks. | 00:42:19 | |
| As buffer zones, but they're. | 00:42:23 | |
| Part of our question had often been. | 00:42:25 | |
| You know, is that an area that's just been cleared, it's simply a set back or do we have? | 00:42:28 | |
| Visual buffer and I'm hearing in the presentation that we have areas that are left natural, so you wouldn't lose that. | 00:42:33 | |
| Undergrowth, which is the visual on that and I think we have language about. | 00:42:42 | |
| Either natural vegetative buffer or fencing on that. Yeah. So we offered that was the buffering. | 00:42:46 | |
| Was one of the elements of our subdivision ordinance rewrite that was met with. | 00:42:55 | |
| Some raised eyebrows from the development community. So we did and do offer more flexibility. So the starting point is kind of 25 | 00:43:02 | |
| foot undisturbed vegetated buffer. But we we do see some very nice interventions such as. | 00:43:10 | |
| Vegetated burns with privacy fences, you know, and I think what would be a good suggestion from the Commission if you should. | 00:43:19 | |
| Be interested in proceeding. | 00:43:29 | |
| Is really a more detail. | 00:43:30 | |
| And perhaps a transect or sort of a view. | 00:43:33 | |
| Of what? Similar to what was done here for the roadway of what would be proposed and the width. | 00:43:38 | |
| Of those. | 00:43:46 | |
| Proposed buffers. | 00:43:47 | |
| Some questions I did have about. | 00:43:49 | |
| You know, bringing electricity to the site. | 00:43:53 | |
| Have you guys looked at that? | 00:43:57 | |
| We. | 00:44:02 | |
| Has the electric is obviously runs down Saint Mary's Road, but we would have it within the community would all be underground. So | 00:44:05 | |
| everything we would do you know through you can show in the on the right of way cross section there is a utility corridor. | 00:44:11 | |
| That would be where that would come and then stub out to each individual lot, but it would be underground. No power poles with it. | 00:44:18 | |
| Other than. | 00:44:23 | |
| The required streetlights, great. So one of the things that we're struggling with right now on the Exit 1 development. | 00:44:24 | |
| Is the extension of the of the power and you know, we're we're artfully trying to negotiate with Georgia Power, not a full | 00:44:31 | |
| clearing of the tree line on Saint Mary's Road, so. | 00:44:36 | |
| I think. | 00:44:42 | |
| The the view of this development from Saint Mary's Road will be one that is vegetated tree line. It'll be yeah, yeah, that would | 00:44:43 | |
| be our goal. | 00:44:47 | |
| Yeah. | 00:44:51 | |
| Also, one thing that was mentioned just for the Commission. | 00:44:53 | |
| Talk through a little bit, and I don't know if we explicitly said this, but I think this is. | 00:44:57 | |
| Of interest to. | 00:45:02 | |
| The residential community that is to the east. | 00:45:04 | |
| Of the proposed development. | 00:45:08 | |
| This area that you're seeing here, which kind of lacks color. | 00:45:10 | |
| That's how in our zoning map, we identify an established right of way. | 00:45:16 | |
| So that was, at one point in time, meant to be an extension of Mickler. | 00:45:21 | |
| To Saint Mary's Road. | 00:45:28 | |
| Staff has discussed this quite a bit internally and also with the applicant. | 00:45:30 | |
| With the existence of that. | 00:45:36 | |
| Railroad and the challenges of getting a railroad crossing. | 00:45:39 | |
| The wetlands that exist within that right of way. | 00:45:44 | |
| It has been sort of. | 00:45:47 | |
| It has been. | 00:45:50 | |
| Dropped. | 00:45:51 | |
| As a potential extension. | 00:45:52 | |
| Of McClure. | 00:45:55 | |
| So the access points as proposed. | 00:45:56 | |
| By sorry, my apologies, I keep flicking through all of these. | 00:45:59 | |
| Nope, gonna get it right. | 00:46:04 | |
| Here there is. | 00:46:06 | |
| So the you know the entry point that is being proposed right now. | 00:46:08 | |
| Is that that main entry off of Mickler and you can see the? | 00:46:13 | |
| Right of way or off of Saint Mary's Road. Apologies. | 00:46:17 | |
| And you can see the right of way here that is essentially being undisturbed. | 00:46:20 | |
| And we did that intentionally to minimize the wetlands impacts. | 00:46:24 | |
| One other thing I do want to point out which was alluded to. | 00:46:30 | |
| As some of you may recall. | 00:46:36 | |
| This area. | 00:46:39 | |
| Which is. | 00:46:41 | |
| On the other side of Saint Mary's Road. | 00:46:42 | |
| Is part of a planned development district known as Sweetgrass. | 00:46:45 | |
| It's been kind of floating around for a while, but the landholder is still interested in proceeding. | 00:46:51 | |
| They will have an entrance off of Saint Mary's Road. | 00:46:59 | |
| That cuts north. | 00:47:02 | |
| Kind of close to this Forestry Rd. here. | 00:47:05 | |
| This area is proposed for condominiums that has been approved and has gone through. | 00:47:08 | |
| This area here is mixed-use development. | 00:47:15 | |
| So you'll have office, retail, commercial. | 00:47:19 | |
| And we're. | 00:47:23 | |
| We're speaking with the. | 00:47:24 | |
| Developers right now. | 00:47:27 | |
| The interior roadway, there'll be sort of an A parallel interior roadway here. | 00:47:30 | |
| Which will have a multimodal path be golf carnival. | 00:47:36 | |
| Highly landscaped and the approach here is to try to create some. | 00:47:40 | |
| Community scale commercial that this community. | 00:47:47 | |
| Could walk or golf cartoon. | 00:47:50 | |
| So I don't envision. | 00:47:52 | |
| A connection over Saint Mary's Road before these, between these two developments, you know. | 00:47:55 | |
| That's something that we're working on. | 00:48:01 | |
| On the other side of Saint Mary's Road, with intersection cuts and connections and traffic lights. | 00:48:03 | |
| I don't see that here. I see this will be. | 00:48:08 | |
| One if not 2 entrances and no real. | 00:48:10 | |
| Connectivity to the other side. | 00:48:15 | |
| You know, unless you got in your car and got on the road and. | 00:48:19 | |
| Turned in, but there will be sort of a higher density development in that part of. | 00:48:21 | |
| The undeveloped region there. | 00:48:28 | |
| And lastly, what I'll say is that the a portion of. | 00:48:30 | |
| The parcels under discussion are located in Tax Allocation district #3. | 00:48:35 | |
| So some of the future. | 00:48:41 | |
| Whether they be. | 00:48:43 | |
| Multimodal path improvements or. | 00:48:46 | |
| Public right of way improvements. Something like that could be. | 00:48:49 | |
| Pursued through our tax allocation district. | 00:48:54 | |
| Application process. | 00:48:58 | |
| Thank you. | 00:49:02 | |
| Elaine, if you yes, I guess the area. | 00:49:03 | |
| That I have the most questions about is the one that is the R1 with the. | 00:49:07 | |
| Largest number of homes in a. | 00:49:13 | |
| When I look at it, it looks like you're going to have an awful lot of traffic going. | 00:49:17 | |
| Out of that area, in front of a handful of houses, out to get to the exit. | 00:49:23 | |
| And it just seems like it's. | 00:49:29 | |
| Going to be a lot of traffic in that right in that section. I know you're going to be doing traffic studies and. | 00:49:33 | |
| You're hoping to get other. | 00:49:38 | |
| Yes, absence, but you're inside their community. | 00:49:40 | |
| You're speaking, I'm inside the community. I think you're referring to this, this area here. | 00:49:43 | |
| Passing in front of a few select houses there. Yes, yes, those are all. Those are all duplexes too, are they not? No, those will | 00:49:48 | |
| still be the single family. | 00:49:52 | |
| So yes, there you know, unfortunately that's going to be regardless there's. | 00:49:57 | |
| There's going to be some pinch points somewhere along the line. We do our best to try and minimize that. We are kind of. | 00:50:03 | |
| It's a balance we're trying to achieve the best balance of. | 00:50:10 | |
| How much you know Woodlands do we take out? Do we put in more streets? How much wetlands do we remove? | 00:50:14 | |
| We know that those are going to be. | 00:50:21 | |
| The more difficult houses to sell, to be honest and but yeah, it's a balance we. | 00:50:24 | |
| Try to minimize that as best we can. And then I was also concerned because of the density of the area. | 00:50:30 | |
| How big are the driveways? How many cars can park on? | 00:50:40 | |
| Their personal lot, yeah. So they would be a 16 foot wide driveway. It would match this two car garage. | 00:50:44 | |
| So you would be able to park at least two vehicles. | 00:50:52 | |
| In the garage and two and two parking spaces. Surface parking in the driveway. | 00:50:55 | |
| Because that was the other question, is company parking? | 00:51:00 | |
| Those streets, I know you're just trying to make them a little wider, but I mean, if. | 00:51:06 | |
| Folks parked all in the street. | 00:51:10 | |
| And emergency vehicles had to get in. It could be a bit of a problem and we. | 00:51:12 | |
| And we would go back and need to adjust that, but that may be part of our. | 00:51:18 | |
| HOA covenants and restrictions is that we would not have any on street parking. | 00:51:23 | |
| But then if you didn't have any on street, where would they put? Where would the company? | 00:51:28 | |
| Park that. You would have 4 parking spaces per unit. There would also be. | 00:51:33 | |
| There is also additional and some of the amenity spaces there, there's parking there. | 00:51:37 | |
| We know it. | 00:51:43 | |
| We feel that it meets the requirement, I mean. | 00:51:44 | |
| Could we stop people from throwing a big birthday bash and having a bunch of cars down the street? You know, I don't know, but we | 00:51:47 | |
| would have that restrictions in place to try to minimize that. At least no parking on only one side of the street or something on | 00:51:52 | |
| that or? | 00:51:57 | |
| Yeah, you're right. The other concern I think you've answered, but I'm assuming there'll be a lot of families with children here. | 00:52:02 | |
| And the school is like right over there on the other side of the. | 00:52:09 | |
| Railroad tracks. | 00:52:13 | |
| And they're probably too close to get busing. | 00:52:15 | |
| Yeah, so I'm worried about these little ******* trying to squeeze through whatever you put up to get to that school because | 00:52:19 | |
| walking all the way around. | 00:52:25 | |
| Is a long way, yeah. | 00:52:31 | |
| That would be. That's a bit of a concern for me too. Understood. Yeah, I think that's fair. We'd be happy to discuss that and come | 00:52:32 | |
| to the resolution with the tell kids. They're gonna try and find a way. Yeah. | 00:52:39 | |
| A resolution with the with the school district, we can, we can work through that maybe if they look at it. | 00:52:45 | |
| Instead of a straight line if there is. | 00:52:50 | |
| But yeah, with the railroad there and we talked about that with some of the restrictions. | 00:52:53 | |
| The difficulty of any type of railroad crossing. | 00:52:57 | |
| Is just hard to come by these days so. | 00:53:01 | |
| But we would be open to talking about that with the school district. Those were my primary concern. Thank you. Thank you. | 00:53:04 | |
| What's your? What is the? | 00:53:11 | |
| Percentage. | 00:53:12 | |
| Of duplex versus single family, Oh gosh, I'm looking at, let's see, it's less than half would be the duplexes of the 325, it's | 00:53:14 | |
| 179. | 00:53:20 | |
| Of the detached and 146 of the attached. So it's pretty much. | 00:53:26 | |
| Kind of 5050. It's a little little, yeah, there's. | 00:53:31 | |
| Slightly more of the detached homes on the bigger lots. | 00:53:35 | |
| One of my big concerns. | 00:53:38 | |
| I live right around the corner there. | 00:53:40 | |
| At Aspe Cove. | 00:53:44 | |
| We've had quite a few people killed. | 00:53:45 | |
| Trying to get out of Osprey Cove on the Saint Mary's Road. | 00:53:47 | |
| The bulk of the people coming out of this, they're going to be turning left. | 00:53:50 | |
| Because if you turn right and go to Colerain. | 00:53:54 | |
| Turn left. You can go to Saint Mary's or you can go to 95 right. | 00:53:56 | |
| You need another entrance on the. | 00:54:01 | |
| Saint Mary's for this many people. Yes, that. | 00:54:03 | |
| And I couldn't approve. | 00:54:06 | |
| Can't even consider approving it until you can show you have two entrances. Well, we've got 3 on this site plan we've got right | 00:54:09 | |
| now. There's you don't have the approval form. | 00:54:13 | |
| Omega Cubia. | 00:54:18 | |
| Or do you that's a question that statement. | 00:54:20 | |
| It's a good possibility he won't get the second entrance. | 00:54:23 | |
| Off that. | 00:54:28 | |
| I know for a fact. | 00:54:30 | |
| The dot turned down 1 developer before. | 00:54:31 | |
| Try to get a psychiatrist. | 00:54:35 | |
| Down towards Colerain Rd. | 00:54:37 | |
| What we would like to see one foot. | 00:54:39 | |
| DLT and the Navy both have to approve. | 00:54:42 | |
| A second interest on that room. | 00:54:46 | |
| Because it is. | 00:54:48 | |
| A limited access Rd. | 00:54:49 | |
| And the city's got no say so over it. | 00:54:52 | |
| Second question, is something you said a little disturbing? | 00:54:56 | |
| He said these are going to be $300,000 houses. | 00:55:01 | |
| Yet you're saying they're they're four bedroom? | 00:55:04 | |
| There they would be. | 00:55:08 | |
| You didn't mention square footage at all. | 00:55:10 | |
| They're in the slides there. I can show you some of those. | 00:55:12 | |
| I don't see this as a. | 00:55:17 | |
| Have a positive impact. | 00:55:19 | |
| On the communities that are already there, I see it being a negative. | 00:55:21 | |
| And the pricing is of course. | 00:55:25 | |
| We're trying to look two years into the future and so when these houses will actually come to market based on if they were here | 00:55:29 | |
| today from what our cost and and what. | 00:55:34 | |
| We feel would be a viable project and would be sell. | 00:55:40 | |
| Would be able to sell. | 00:55:44 | |
| Would be and that would be on the smaller end for those 350 or the 300, you know that would be at the. | 00:55:46 | |
| Three bedroom, 2 bath. | 00:55:53 | |
| 1500 to 1800 square foot your single. | 00:55:55 | |
| Single level. | 00:55:58 | |
| And then the other ones you know, that be 2350 square feet, four bedroom, 2 1/2 bath. | 00:56:00 | |
| What we call our Headley Bay model. | 00:56:06 | |
| But we would be starting. | 00:56:09 | |
| In those ranges there in the mid twos and then in the mid threes for the other community that's going in now. | 00:56:11 | |
| I believe they're staring at six. | 00:56:19 | |
| Which is 1 heck of a Yeah, I don't I I'm not sure. I mean, I have to interject here. | 00:56:23 | |
| Not apples to apples there. I think that's not at all. I think, you know, it's a, it would be a, a gated community. | 00:56:29 | |
| Resort amenities, which will start in the sixes. | 00:56:36 | |
| But umm. | 00:56:39 | |
| We do have an existing housing development, Hayden Point, if you'll remember that it's gone through. It's now in its third phase. | 00:56:40 | |
| Hayden Point, another large home developer, can bring, you know, a. | 00:56:49 | |
| 1600 square foot, 3 bedroom, 2 bath, single family home to market at about 3:15 3/30. | 00:56:55 | |
| So, and those are. | 00:57:02 | |
| I mean, if our permit tech was here, she would tell you they they come through and they sell. I'm more concerned about the | 00:57:04 | |
| entrance. | 00:57:07 | |
| Under the highway, yeah. And we would have the traffic studies and we've worked with G dot on that to make sure that. | 00:57:11 | |
| Everything is adequate and maybe. | 00:57:17 | |
| Whatever if their signalization required or whatever it is that we are asked to do. | 00:57:20 | |
| By the Department of Transportation is what we plan to meet. | 00:57:25 | |
| Thank you. | 00:57:31 | |
| Other questions from. | 00:57:32 | |
| Members. | 00:57:33 | |
| Yep. All right. Thank you. We're going to address the sexual plan. I'll address in the. | 00:57:35 | |
| We're addressing all. | 00:57:42 | |
| Elements of this will take separate actions for the rezoning versus the versus the conceptual. But for this. | 00:57:44 | |
| Purpose of the discussion and also the public comment, we're going to look at all both the rezoning and the conceptual. So any | 00:57:51 | |
| questions you have on either one of those. | 00:57:56 | |
| Categories want to bring forward. | 00:58:01 | |
| OK. All right. So with that, we're going to open up our public comment section. | 00:58:03 | |
| Of this, so if you'd like to give comment on this, if you'll come forward, give your name and address. | 00:58:09 | |
| Question. | 00:58:16 | |
| We, I think as part of public comment you can pose what your questions are and we'll try to see if we can. | 00:58:19 | |
| Answer them. | 00:58:26 | |
| So do I have anyone for public comment on this item? | 00:58:28 | |
| You'll come forward. | 00:58:32 | |
| Dave Schmitz, 112 new hammock. | 00:58:37 | |
| Circle up and shadow on. | 00:58:40 | |
| It's on green. | 00:58:43 | |
| I think you're good, maybe just closer. | 00:58:45 | |
| Understanding this is early in the conversation. | 00:58:48 | |
| For what's going on here. | 00:58:51 | |
| Umm, but. | 00:58:54 | |
| One of my concerns and looking at what's been presented today. | 00:58:57 | |
| And I think. | 00:59:01 | |
| Mr. White. | 00:59:03 | |
| Addressed it. | 00:59:05 | |
| Fairly well. | 00:59:06 | |
| But come on folks. | 00:59:09 | |
| Every family is going to have at least two cars and if they've got kids, maybe 3 or 4. | 00:59:11 | |
| Umm. | 00:59:17 | |
| In the conceptual drawing. | 00:59:22 | |
| It looked to me like there was room behind the house that maybe you could move the house back a little bit or make the driveway | 00:59:25 | |
| wider. | 00:59:28 | |
| But umm. | 00:59:32 | |
| With no on street parking. | 00:59:33 | |
| I suspect that parking is going to be an issue. | 00:59:36 | |
| I would question. | 00:59:40 | |
| Who, when this is all said and done and and people are moving in, who owns the roads? | 00:59:42 | |
| Are they going to be part of the subdivision's HOA's responsibility? | 00:59:50 | |
| As they are like in Ashby Cove. | 00:59:56 | |
| Or are they gonna be? | 00:59:58 | |
| A city issue. | 01:00:02 | |
| Or government issue. | 01:00:04 | |
| I didn't see. | 01:00:08 | |
| Anything addressing? | 01:00:10 | |
| Probably every 3rd house will have a book parked in front of it or next to it. | 01:00:13 | |
| So. | 01:00:17 | |
| This early in the conversation, maybe there ought to be some. | 01:00:20 | |
| Thought given to boat and RV parking. | 01:00:23 | |
| I didn't see on there. | 01:00:31 | |
| How wide the driveways were for the duplexes. | 01:00:33 | |
| But their single car? | 01:00:37 | |
| So I'm guessing the driveways aren't as wide as a. | 01:00:39 | |
| Two car driveway. | 01:00:42 | |
| And does that indicate that each family would then only be able to park one in the garage and one in the driveway? | 01:00:44 | |
| Again. | 01:00:52 | |
| If there's a teenager in the house, you're going to have at least three cars. | 01:00:53 | |
| And I figured this was the time to talk about that stuff, so. | 01:00:58 | |
| Thank you for your time. | 01:01:02 | |
| Mr. White, I don't know if you want to respond. | 01:01:03 | |
| To any of those. | 01:01:06 | |
| Questions that you've got a quick answer for. | 01:01:08 | |
| The I can speak to. | 01:01:11 | |
| It is our standard practice as a company that. | 01:01:15 | |
| We as part of our HOA guidelines that we will have established. | 01:01:18 | |
| There will not be any. | 01:01:23 | |
| RV or boat parking. | 01:01:24 | |
| Allowed in front of the homes or on the street? If it's something that can be fit in a garage then. | 01:01:27 | |
| Wonderful. | 01:01:32 | |
| But otherwise it can't be exposed throughout the street. | 01:01:33 | |
| The parking requirements. | 01:01:37 | |
| I would just ask you know that we would just be asked to meet what is required by the code. | 01:01:39 | |
| As we do that. | 01:01:45 | |
| Whatever those those calculated number of spaces are. | 01:01:46 | |
| Will meet that requirement if it means that we need to find some place for some surface parking. | 01:01:50 | |
| In order to meet that requirement, we will work that in, but at this point we feel like we've we've met what? | 01:01:56 | |
| Required by code and we will. | 01:02:02 | |
| Make sure that we always will. | 01:02:04 | |
| And then ownership on streets, infrastructure, you know, we've talked to. | 01:02:06 | |
| We're open either way to whatever is obviously what is agreeable to the city, whether it's dedicated to the city. | 01:02:12 | |
| Through the. | 01:02:20 | |
| We can do that. | 01:02:21 | |
| If if you would, if the city would prefer and as we go through the planning process. | 01:02:23 | |
| For those dedications, if the city has an objection to that. | 01:02:28 | |
| We would be hoping to do that. It would just mean that it would that would be more the maintenance cost that would passed on to | 01:02:32 | |
| the homeowners. | 01:02:35 | |
| OK. | 01:02:40 | |
| All right. | 01:02:42 | |
| Ken Jolly 102 Salt grass trace here in Saint Mary's. | 01:02:46 | |
| Relative to recreational vehicles. | 01:02:50 | |
| For the most part. | 01:02:54 | |
| They don't fit in a garage. They're just not going to go in there. | 01:02:55 | |
| So living in shadow lawn, we have the same problem. | 01:02:58 | |
| Individuals have attempted then to park on. | 01:03:04 | |
| The grass which? | 01:03:08 | |
| Is not permitted. | 01:03:09 | |
| So that's something to consider is there are going to be people that have RV's, they're going to be folks that have large boats. | 01:03:11 | |
| That will not fit in the garage. | 01:03:18 | |
| They're going to have two cars parked in the driveway, maybe more. | 01:03:20 | |
| Where will that recreational vehicle or larger? | 01:03:25 | |
| Larger boat go. | 01:03:28 | |
| The other question. | 01:03:30 | |
| I don't travel a lot up and down St. Mary's Rd. but. | 01:03:32 | |
| As I recall when I do. | 01:03:36 | |
| Isn't there a grassed median? | 01:03:39 | |
| All the way on that part of Saint Mary's Road. | 01:03:42 | |
| So if you were to be exiting from this development, need to turn left. | 01:03:46 | |
| You would have to turn right. | 01:03:50 | |
| And go to Colerain Road and make a left and then come back. | 01:03:52 | |
| You could go straight across. | 01:03:56 | |
| You're straight across the grass median. That's where people die. | 01:03:58 | |
| Well, that's not permitted. | 01:04:02 | |
| I think that it's another. | 01:04:04 | |
| Awful Saint Mary right across the street. | 01:04:07 | |
| From this one. | 01:04:11 | |
| And I think. | 01:04:13 | |
| It is a turn around me. I'm not. I don't remember. I don't recall so. | 01:04:14 | |
| But that's something to take a look at and. | 01:04:21 | |
| And then evaluate. Thank you very much. | 01:04:24 | |
| OK. | 01:04:26 | |
| I have. And if you'll give your name and address, my name is Andrea Cody. I live at 201 Tory Drive. | 01:04:32 | |
| And Miss Stein, if you would zoom out, I'll show you exactly where I am. | 01:04:39 | |
| So I. | 01:04:45 | |
| Right here. | 01:04:48 | |
| And we've lived there since 2012. | 01:04:53 | |
| So we've been there a little while, saw the land change. | 01:04:55 | |
| Hands a few times after Oscar passed away, but. | 01:04:59 | |
| I do have a question. So the townhouses, are they going to be for sale or for rent or for? | 01:05:02 | |
| They will be approved. | 01:05:09 | |
| Should I speak to the microphone? Yeah. | 01:05:11 | |
| That's OK. | 01:05:14 | |
| They will be a fee simple separate lot, meaning they are sold now. There won't be a restriction at least to where if somebody buys | 01:05:15 | |
| it and they want to rent their house. | 01:05:21 | |
| But each one will be a four cell unit, OK. | 01:05:26 | |
| Because I, I heard you mentioned the property management and I thought, well, this is going to be a rental thing or like a | 01:05:29 | |
| apartment complex or townhouse complex. | 01:05:33 | |
| And I was confused. | 01:05:38 | |
| And the other thing I wanted to say, somebody talked about the utilities as far as power. | 01:05:39 | |
| But also. | 01:05:46 | |
| Has anybody looked into water? | 01:05:47 | |
| The utilities for the water because I know we've had some issues. | 01:05:49 | |
| With the water system. | 01:05:54 | |
| Near Marilee Clark. I don't know if anybody knew about that recently, but. | 01:05:56 | |
| We've had some water issues. | 01:06:01 | |
| With the sewer. | 01:06:04 | |
| And merely around Marilee Clark and in our issue, we have some flooding issues just because there are behind my house on my lot. | 01:06:06 | |
| I have protected wetlands that I can't. | 01:06:13 | |
| Destroy. I can't build on or anything. | 01:06:16 | |
| And I know we spoke on the lots for proposed rezoning. There's some wetlands there are. I didn't know if they were. | 01:06:18 | |
| Any protective wetlands or if they were just wetlands that. | 01:06:25 | |
| Can be mitigated and built on. | 01:06:28 | |
| And as far as mitigating and built on it. | 01:06:31 | |
| I was going to have the same comment about the townhouses the the the duplexes. | 01:06:35 | |
| With the one car garage and I've seen them. | 01:06:39 | |
| I we lived in Virginia for a while, so I have I'm familiar with Ryan Holmes and some of their buildings. | 01:06:43 | |
| And the single. | 01:06:48 | |
| Garage with the townhouse units. They have the the narrow driveway. | 01:06:51 | |
| If you have two. | 01:06:55 | |
| Two people like a husband and a wife. | 01:06:57 | |
| If one parks in the garage and one parks in the driveway. | 01:06:59 | |
| I mean, there's no, there's no with an 8 foot wide driveway, there's no jockeying around somebody if the person in the garage has | 01:07:03 | |
| to leave before the person in the driveway and. | 01:07:07 | |
| And I mean, I've raised two teenagers, so we've had four cars in our driveway at one point in time. | 01:07:11 | |
| And parking on the road if you're not going to park on the road. | 01:07:16 | |
| Then you come into. | 01:07:21 | |
| An issue with. | 01:07:23 | |
| Just the amount of drivers that. | 01:07:24 | |
| In the amount of cars. | 01:07:26 | |
| So maybe if. | 01:07:28 | |
| If you're going to have the 8 foot wide driveways. | 01:07:30 | |
| Put some spaces in the community for overflow parking I think. | 01:07:34 | |
| I've seen this in a couple developments around in this in Camden County. I can't remember where but they have. | 01:07:41 | |
| Oh, on in Kingsland as you go by. | 01:07:48 | |
| The golf course there where? | 01:07:51 | |
| Laurel Island is they have a couple overflow. | 01:07:55 | |
| Parking lots that are right off color right there that you can see. | 01:07:58 | |
| And, umm. | 01:08:01 | |
| I mean, that's an option, but I was, I was more. | 01:08:02 | |
| Concerned about the utilities, not only the power, but the water. | 01:08:05 | |
| And infrastructure before we go. | 01:08:11 | |
| Hog wild and. | 01:08:13 | |
| And building all this stuff. | 01:08:14 | |
| And my other question to. | 01:08:16 | |
| The builder was the 30 foot or 25 foot set back from the railroad tracks. | 01:08:19 | |
| So the railroad tracks have. | 01:08:24 | |
| They're raised a bit, and then there's a. | 01:08:27 | |
| And then it goes into the trees. | 01:08:30 | |
| Of their. | 01:08:32 | |
| Of their land, their proposed. | 01:08:34 | |
| Rebuild. Yeah, so. | 01:08:37 | |
| Yeah. So is is the 30 foot going to be from the actual track? | 01:08:41 | |
| To there or is it going to be from where the trees start right now because the trees are set back? | 01:08:50 | |
| The trees don't start, but probably 20. | 01:08:55 | |
| Or so feet from the tracks right now. | 01:08:58 | |
| So I was wondering if. | 01:09:01 | |
| That 25 foot thing, if they're just going to mow down all the trees and just come right up almost to the rocks and where the | 01:09:02 | |
| railroad track is. | 01:09:06 | |
| That was my other question, because the trains do occasionally move on those tracks. They. | 01:09:10 | |
| Their their deadlines, but they still. | 01:09:15 | |
| They still park their trains there sometimes they use it as like an overflow. | 01:09:18 | |
| Type situation. | 01:09:23 | |
| And I do call the police occasionally for the non-emergency number for children who are climbing all over the rail cars and | 01:09:25 | |
| things. | 01:09:29 | |
| And throw rocks at my house but. | 01:09:32 | |
| Yeah, I don't mind until it gets my yard the rocks. | 01:09:35 | |
| And I think those are my only questions and comments and concerns. | 01:09:40 | |
| But thank you for your time. | 01:09:45 | |
| Mr. White, do you want to? | 01:09:47 | |
| Particularly, we've got a question about. | 01:09:50 | |
| How the setback or I don't know if? | 01:09:52 | |
| Jamie, correct me if I'm wrong, Jay, the 25 foot set back would come from. | 01:09:54 | |
| The property line. | 01:10:00 | |
| Not from the railroad track, so if I could show it would be the 25 feet. | 01:10:01 | |
| From here this way. | 01:10:05 | |
| So all that additional from the railroad would still remain. | 01:10:07 | |
| So that would be additional on top of that. | 01:10:11 | |
| So, and I'm sorry, what? | 01:10:13 | |
| What other questions? Is there anything else I can answer? | 01:10:16 | |
| There was a question about protected wetlands and whether there were any plans to. | 01:10:19 | |
| Mitigate yes. So we have in in our plant. So they are not. | 01:10:25 | |
| Protected in the sense that they're put in a conservation. | 01:10:30 | |
| Easement but so they are available we if we chose to. | 01:10:34 | |
| We could mitigate them, we just choose not to. | 01:10:39 | |
| We want to leave that as. | 01:10:42 | |
| Something to beautify the area to keep that. We know that that's what folks are coming here and they want to. | 01:10:45 | |
| Experience as as part of their community and we want to be able to do that. | 01:10:52 | |
| With the parking, we know that. | 01:10:57 | |
| Not everybody wants A1 car garage with a little tiny skinny driveway. | 01:11:00 | |
| But we feel that there are. | 01:11:05 | |
| Folks who that there is a market. | 01:11:08 | |
| For that and we feel like that might be an underserved market here, particularly maybe with the. | 01:11:10 | |
| With the. | 01:11:16 | |
| Military, uh. | 01:11:17 | |
| That would be that there are folks who. | 01:11:18 | |
| Would love to have it would fit their needs to have that type of garage, that type of driveway and that type of home to live in | 01:11:23 | |
| and and they will be yes they will be for sale when we talk about. | 01:11:29 | |
| A property management company that is for the community as a whole to make sure. | 01:11:35 | |
| The grass is being mowed and the pool is being cleaned and that sort of thing. It's not for each individual lot, it's for the | 01:11:39 | |
| community, common areas. | 01:11:43 | |
| And then Jamie, I thought maybe if you want to comment about the process on because we're really only on. | 01:11:48 | |
| Conceptual plan here about analysis. | 01:11:54 | |
| On parking standards and also about infrastructure needs, water, sewer. | 01:11:57 | |
| Yeah. So I think. | 01:12:03 | |
| I'll address. Yeah, sure, sure. | 01:12:06 | |
| What we can do is if you should move to approve at the preliminary plat. | 01:12:10 | |
| Level of review. | 01:12:17 | |
| A few more of the details will be worked out and I think perhaps there's an opportunity there to look for some additional parking | 01:12:19 | |
| spaces. | 01:12:23 | |
| We may also, as staff, explore in the duplex product if there is an opportunity. | 01:12:28 | |
| To maybe do a little bump out here. | 01:12:36 | |
| Maybe make a wider driveway potential, I think there's some avenues that staff can take. | 01:12:39 | |
| With the applicant. | 01:12:46 | |
| To both review parking requirements and to try to add in a little bit more additional parking at the preliminary plat. | 01:12:48 | |
| Level umm. | 01:12:56 | |
| So to address water and sewer. | 01:12:56 | |
| So right now we're looking at the action of. | 01:13:00 | |
| Rezoning the land. | 01:13:04 | |
| Sort of conceptually laying out densities, where homes will be, where roads will be, setbacks, buffers, landscaping. | 01:13:06 | |
| If that does proceed and move forward, the next step will be a little bit of a tighter drawing lines on paper, showing us where | 01:13:15 | |
| those lots will be more exact than what you're seeing in this conceptual plat. | 01:13:20 | |
| Some things may move, some things may change. | 01:13:26 | |
| I think what I would recommend to the applicant. | 01:13:29 | |
| Is to sort of show those wetlands, show what is mitigated, show what is not being mitigated. I think that speaks volumes in this. | 01:13:32 | |
| Development. | 01:13:43 | |
| And would kind of put that message across a little bit more clearly and is also what is getting you that density bonus. | 01:13:44 | |
| And then? | 01:13:52 | |
| If the Commission should choose to proceed beyond the preliminary plat level, then the engineering comes in and takes place and we | 01:13:53 | |
| start to working internally as a team with our public works department, with our Fire Chief, with our building official, the | 01:14:00 | |
| planning and zoning team. We're looking at all of the elements to make sure it meets the zoning, the densities, the setbacks, the | 01:14:06 | |
| roadway design standards. | 01:14:13 | |
| And then at a certain point. | 01:14:20 | |
| We'll put this forward to the Environmental Protection Division that will look at the water and sewer capacity, the draw in the | 01:14:22 | |
| water and make sure that all that capacity is there. | 01:14:27 | |
| And that will be designed and looked at by engineers and signed off on. So it's not something that. | 01:14:32 | |
| This body sees, but it's something that's done kind of behind the scenes to ensure. | 01:14:37 | |
| That the water and sewer infrastructure is put in place. | 01:14:43 | |
| The city also enacts a series of aid to construction fees. Very few people know this, but each single family home puts forward. | 01:14:47 | |
| About $14,000 in aid to construction fees and those go towards the maintenance and upkeep of our water and sewer infrastructure. | 01:14:56 | |
| So you know, with this development comes. | 01:15:03 | |
| The infrastructure that would be put in place and also a significant amount of dollars that would. | 01:15:06 | |
| Go to the city for maintaining that infrastructure. | 01:15:11 | |
| Do we have additional public comment on this item? | 01:15:18 | |
| And again if you give your name and address. | 01:15:22 | |
| My name is Jack Rice. I live at 105 Tory Drive. | 01:15:26 | |
| I'm not here today to speak on opposition of. | 01:15:30 | |
| Improvements or. | 01:15:33 | |
| Things being built. | 01:15:35 | |
| Get a little closer to the mic. | 01:15:37 | |
| I'm here to speak on. | 01:15:39 | |
| Strongly encouraging you all to. | 01:15:41 | |
| Reconsider this single entry entry access point. | 01:15:44 | |
| Speak up, please, Sir. | 01:15:48 | |
| Pick up it goes by a school. | 01:15:50 | |
| An elementary school. | 01:15:54 | |
| There are dozens of children that walk that road daily. | 01:15:56 | |
| I would also strongly. | 01:16:02 | |
| Consider you to. | 01:16:04 | |
| To look back into. | 01:16:07 | |
| There's an abundance of wildlife back. | 01:16:09 | |
| I know that's probably the least of concerns. | 01:16:13 | |
| But I know for a fact that there are Gopher tortoises back there. | 01:16:15 | |
| And I know that that's a protected species in the state of Georgia. | 01:16:20 | |
| With all that being said. | 01:16:25 | |
| I think that's it. | 01:16:27 | |
| Far less prepared as anybody else that stood here tonight. | 01:16:28 | |
| I think that's all I have. | 01:16:33 | |
| OK. Thank you. Thank you. | 01:16:35 | |
| Do you want to, Sir? If you weren't prepared, I'd hate to see if you were, because you were great. Thank you. | 01:16:39 | |
| The uh. | 01:16:46 | |
| A couple of things. | 01:16:48 | |
| One is I can speak to the protected species. | 01:16:50 | |
| We have ordered and are in the process of doing a complete environmental assessment. | 01:16:53 | |
| Which it also includes, you know. | 01:16:58 | |
| It gives us a detailed list of what species are on the property, but also what species. | 01:17:00 | |
| Is this? | 01:17:08 | |
| Habitat for SO even if they don't see them. | 01:17:10 | |
| We got to find out if they're there or not because they potentially could be. | 01:17:13 | |
| So we will do that and also they will look at all. | 01:17:17 | |
| All vegetation, plants, trees. | 01:17:20 | |
| We take all that into consideration and what impacts we have. | 01:17:23 | |
| In order to do this. | 01:17:28 | |
| Project we also have taken the steps of a archaeological survey we've looked for historical. | 01:17:30 | |
| Artifacts. | 01:17:38 | |
| And have gone back and seeing for that and what that would need to do. | 01:17:39 | |
| In any sort of impact archaeologically for the for the community as well. | 01:17:44 | |
| So we're trying to look at all these things we don't know just yet. | 01:17:48 | |
| At this point, we're just conceptual. | 01:17:51 | |
| We're at the. | 01:17:54 | |
| We're just trying to find out. | 01:17:55 | |
| Can we build what we think we want to build here? | 01:17:58 | |
| We may find stuff later on that make it completely. | 01:18:01 | |
| You know, just not feasible for us to do that in which case we will pull the plug, but we just want to get to this initial step to | 01:18:05 | |
| make sure that. | 01:18:09 | |
| Conceptually, we can build. | 01:18:12 | |
| The number of houses of the size of lots. | 01:18:14 | |
| The community that we're envisioning and if conceptually we can do that and move on to the next step. | 01:18:17 | |
| And we'll verify and check all the boxes before we get everything all done, before we ever put a shovel on the ground. | 01:18:23 | |
| Thank you. | 01:18:31 | |
| Do we have other public comment on this item? | 01:18:33 | |
| OK. | 01:18:40 | |
| I'm Charlene Reiness. I live next door to Miss Andrea at 203 Torrey. | 01:18:41 | |
| And something you were saying describing the development, which struck me as crazy. | 01:18:46 | |
| But the more amenities we include, the more dog pass, one pass, the more permission we get to cram more people into this space. | 01:18:52 | |
| That's nuts to me. They still driving, going to school. | 01:18:58 | |
| Using the utilities, I don't see how that makes. | 01:19:05 | |
| Us a better community, cramming more people into a small place. And I know we're going to build. I know we're growing. | 01:19:09 | |
| For these duplexes, I'm going to walk out of my front yard and see these duplexes which. | 01:19:15 | |
| I think we can do better. I think we can do better single family homes. | 01:19:21 | |
| More green space. That's not enough to my liking. | 01:19:25 | |
| I mean, we can do better. Let's not cheapen our area. I spent most of my adult life on Saint Simon's. They have ruined it. | 01:19:29 | |
| Absolutely ruined that neighborhood. There's people on top of people, the traffic, the streets flood. | 01:19:36 | |
| We don't want to have that here. | 01:19:42 | |
| And what will this look like in 10 years? You know it's going to be brand new shiny right now. | 01:19:44 | |
| It's going to get a bunch of renters in there. It's not going to be brand new and shiny forever. The traffic. | 01:19:49 | |
| I mean, let's just make good choices. Let's make something that we're going to be proud of. | 01:19:54 | |
| To look back on, you know, in the future. | 01:19:59 | |
| That's all I have to say. | 01:20:02 | |
| OK. | 01:20:04 | |
| I appreciate that. Thank you for your comment, ma'am. | 01:20:07 | |
| I just wanted to. | 01:20:13 | |
| Make it known that. | 01:20:14 | |
| The density bonus we're asking for if we're looking at just number of units per acre. | 01:20:16 | |
| We, by right, could build more houses than we're asking for right here. The only reason we're asking for a bonus, the bonus is so | 01:20:22 | |
| that we can narrow those lots. We're not asking for more lots, we're just asking that we can do smaller, which gives us more green | 01:20:28 | |
| space by having these smaller lots. | 01:20:33 | |
| So we feel like, uh, uh. | 01:20:39 | |
| You know what we're asking to do. | 01:20:40 | |
| Would be beneficial. | 01:20:42 | |
| We know that. | 01:20:44 | |
| Things are changing, and that's always. | 01:20:46 | |
| Difficult and but we feel like. | 01:20:48 | |
| We build a quality product and we that we can. | 01:20:51 | |
| We can stand behind and you know, I would invite anybody to take a look at any of our projects that have been done for 10 years. | 01:20:55 | |
| We've been in business since 1948. | 01:20:59 | |
| Go look at some of our communities that have been around for 50 years. | 01:21:05 | |
| And and and see what they look like. So thank you. | 01:21:08 | |
| Looks like we have another comment if you want to come forward. | 01:21:13 | |
| I'm Christiane Martin. | 01:21:23 | |
| I live at 620 Victoria Circle, Saint Mary's, Georgia. | 01:21:25 | |
| My concern is. | 01:21:30 | |
| One entrance. | 01:21:31 | |
| Our elementary school. | 01:21:33 | |
| The traffic on that road, it's two lanes. It gets crazy. | 01:21:35 | |
| And we've got little kids walking. I mean taking the back Rd. to it. | 01:21:39 | |
| All that, I don't think that's been taken into consideration. | 01:21:43 | |
| And it really needs to be. It's going to be dangerous. | 01:21:47 | |
| Thank you. | 01:21:51 | |
| If I could, I've I've heard this public comment now twice, so I want to be very clear of how this property is being accessed. | 01:21:53 | |
| It is being accessed off of Saint Mary's Road. | 01:22:02 | |
| The roadway will not. | 01:22:05 | |
| Continue. | 01:22:08 | |
| Mickler So I just I just want to be, I just want to be careful there. So this this drawing. | 01:22:11 | |
| You could perceive that this is going to be. | 01:22:17 | |
| A roadway here, I'm sorry, I'm pointing. You can't see that. | 01:22:21 | |
| This is not. This is undeveloped land. | 01:22:24 | |
| This is just demarcate demarcating. | 01:22:28 | |
| The city's right of way, the roadway we will the development will enter off of Saint Mary's Road. | 01:22:30 | |
| There will be no traffic. | 01:22:37 | |
| Going over and onto Mickler Drive. | 01:22:40 | |
| Can I clarify what I think she's trying? | 01:22:44 | |
| Correct me if I'm wrong and if you give your name and that yes ma'am, my name or Sir, sorry, my name is Ashley Rice. I'm at 105 | 01:22:50 | |
| Tory Dr. also. | 01:22:53 | |
| And I think. | 01:22:57 | |
| One of my concerns as well as maybe theirs. | 01:22:59 | |
| The school entrance a as a city. | 01:23:02 | |
| So now we've got the Esplanade going in at exit 1. | 01:23:07 | |
| This is potential, I hear you saying. There's another subdivision going across the street. | 01:23:11 | |
| My kids go to Mary Lee Clark. The school is going. | 01:23:16 | |
| To explode. | 01:23:20 | |
| It is already. | 01:23:22 | |
| Fairly busy school. | 01:23:24 | |
| And I think. | 01:23:25 | |
| What they're trying to say is that the school entrance only has one entrance, not. | 01:23:27 | |
| Not the neighborhood entrance, but. | 01:23:32 | |
| They're going to go around to Mickler. | 01:23:34 | |
| And everyone is going to pile in. I don't know if you've been down Mickler at drop off or pickup. | 01:23:37 | |
| But it is mass chaos. | 01:23:42 | |
| If you do not get there by two 4245. | 01:23:45 | |
| You're out on the street for pickup and if we're adding all of these extra homes to it. | 01:23:49 | |
| How are we going to accommodate? | 01:23:55 | |
| All of that traffic. | 01:23:58 | |
| Thank you. | 01:24:01 | |
| All right, do we have other comment on this item? | 01:24:05 | |
| All right, seeing none, I'm going to go ahead and close the public comment. | 01:24:11 | |
| Portion of this. | 01:24:15 | |
| With that, then, are there do we have further discussion that we need to have? | 01:24:18 | |
| On this and I think it might be helpful again. | 01:24:23 | |
| If you, Jamie, kind of remind folks. | 01:24:26 | |
| Of our process and what we're doing here tonight versus what? | 01:24:29 | |
| Where the opportunities are. | 01:24:35 | |
| With additional information that it comes back to. | 01:24:37 | |
| The Planning Commission? Sure. Yep, happy to do that. | 01:24:40 | |
| So I also want to take a moment just to, we didn't walk through these materials. I, I know this is a little bit difficult to see | 01:24:44 | |
| here. I apologize. | 01:24:48 | |
| Um, in the application there were. | 01:24:53 | |
| A few conceptual plants that were submitted. | 01:24:58 | |
| What I am showing you now is the. | 01:25:01 | |
| There we go. | 01:25:06 | |
| Is the straight zoning. I'm sorry, I don't know why that keeps going off, but. | 01:25:08 | |
| What I am trying to convey here is to. | 01:25:14 | |
| Address the the the crazy comment that I made earlier. I'm trying to address that. | 01:25:17 | |
| It's not that, it's more and more as Mr. White said. | 01:25:23 | |
| The straight zoning will allow a certain amount of homes. | 01:25:27 | |
| As well as the residential density bonus. So I just. | 01:25:32 | |
| Would encourage the commissioners to look at that overall site plan. | 01:25:37 | |
| In comparison, there is more density and there is more also. | 01:25:42 | |
| Open space is a part of that. | 01:25:47 | |
| The next thing I'll go towards. | 01:25:50 | |
| Is where we are in this process. | 01:25:53 | |
| Right now, this evening before you, is the rezoning of the four parcels. | 01:25:56 | |
| So predominantly shifting what is. | 01:26:01 | |
| Commercial zoning. | 01:26:04 | |
| You know, commercial zoning also has. | 01:26:07 | |
| Very few setbacks has a larger lot coverage allocation, so the intensity of development and going from commercial. | 01:26:10 | |
| Which is currently zoned to residential is a reduction in that development intensity. | 01:26:19 | |
| So before you tonight, is there a rezoning of these 4 parcels? | 01:26:26 | |
| In addition to that, is a conceptual plat. | 01:26:30 | |
| That conceptual plan, as Mr. White said, is showing you. | 01:26:34 | |
| The proposed density. The proposed open space, the proposed amenity space, the layout, the roadways. | 01:26:39 | |
| Not. | 01:26:46 | |
| Fully engineered by any means, just conceptual. | 01:26:47 | |
| If you should move to approve this, it will proceed to Council for review and approval. | 01:26:51 | |
| If that also gets approved, then it will advance. | 01:26:58 | |
| To the next stage, which is the preliminary plot. | 01:27:01 | |
| Little bit more engineering, a little bit more layout. | 01:27:04 | |
| What I would suggest is that we. | 01:27:09 | |
| You know, take any more questions. | 01:27:12 | |
| Discuss potential conditions. | 01:27:15 | |
| If you'd like to take that route. | 01:27:18 | |
| But I think as part of this. | 01:27:21 | |
| Looking at the conceptual plan. | 01:27:23 | |
| You're kind of hearing from the Commission and from the public. | 01:27:26 | |
| About the concerns about. | 01:27:29 | |
| Traffic access. | 01:27:32 | |
| Impact on schools. | 01:27:35 | |
| Buffer zones on site parking, So those are. | 01:27:37 | |
| I think kind of a preview. | 01:27:41 | |
| Of when we get to a preliminary plat. | 01:27:43 | |
| Of things that as you're moving forward on this process. | 01:27:46 | |
| That there will be more detail. | 01:27:50 | |
| And you've already talked about? | 01:27:52 | |
| Traffic study and you know G dot. | 01:27:54 | |
| And coordinating with them on what's allowable, what's not allowable and sort of things. So we're kind of stepping. | 01:27:58 | |
| Through this. | 01:28:04 | |
| Process so. | 01:28:05 | |
| Tonight, if we. | 01:28:07 | |
| Are to approve this. | 01:28:09 | |
| We are not then saying OK. | 01:28:11 | |
| Go do this. | 01:28:14 | |
| We're saying this is our first. | 01:28:15 | |
| Step forward. | 01:28:18 | |
| On this process, on this being rezoned to be residential and then sort of the the concept of how this would be developed. | 01:28:20 | |
| Yes, but I want to be clear that the. | 01:28:29 | |
| The approach of adding the conceptual plat stage to our subdivision process. | 01:28:34 | |
| Was so that the Commission and the developer very early on. | 01:28:41 | |
| In the development could get. | 01:28:45 | |
| On board about. | 01:28:48 | |
| Densities, open space, amenities, layouts, roadways, access. So it's kind of a go or no go zone and I think we need to be clear. | 01:28:49 | |
| About, you know, one of the things that we talked about when we were rewriting the subdivision ordinance. | 01:29:01 | |
| Was that it is a worst case scenario? | 01:29:06 | |
| That we come to a final plat. | 01:29:09 | |
| And we have. | 01:29:11 | |
| You know, questions, concerns, right? And we've taken that action. | 01:29:13 | |
| To now insert the conceptual plaque. | 01:29:18 | |
| As a new sort of phase of development that you get that we all get to review. | 01:29:21 | |
| Then also including the preliminary plat. | 01:29:28 | |
| And on the very end, when the final plan comes forward for recording. | 01:29:30 | |
| That doesn't come to this body anymore, that goes straight to council and for recording so. | 01:29:35 | |
| We're trying to front load the process in this conceptual phase to get all these. | 01:29:41 | |
| Kinks out so I think. | 01:29:47 | |
| Part of the discussion is really to. | 01:29:49 | |
| For the Commission and the developer to hear. | 01:29:51 | |
| What will be required in order for you to feel comfortable moving forward at this time? | 01:29:55 | |
| I did want to note we did have 3 written comments that were submitted those. | 01:30:04 | |
| Have been uploaded. | 01:30:09 | |
| So they are part of the record. | 01:30:11 | |
| For these proceedings and one of which I believe the individual was able to attend this meeting in person and also. | 01:30:13 | |
| Give comment. | 01:30:21 | |
| Jamie, do you have maybe it's here and I'm unable to sort it out, but. | 01:30:23 | |
| Of the five parcels. | 01:30:28 | |
| Only one of them is zone. | 01:30:31 | |
| Zoned R5. | 01:30:34 | |
| The rest of them are all C2 if I'm not. | 01:30:35 | |
| I believe. | 01:30:38 | |
| Would that imply that? | 01:30:41 | |
| 4/5 of this is zoned commercial now you got it by acreage or is it? | 01:30:43 | |
| So it looks like. | 01:30:50 | |
| Currently I couldn't tell them in the current zoning. | 01:30:52 | |
| Of the four parcels. | 01:30:58 | |
| In the current zoning, there is a 51 acre parcel that is zoned R5. | 01:30:59 | |
| So that is the townhouse dwelling district. | 01:31:04 | |
| There is a. | 01:31:07 | |
| 16 acre parcel that is zoned commercial. | 01:31:09 | |
| Highway Commercial. | 01:31:13 | |
| There is a 34 acre parcel that is zoned Hwy. commercial. | 01:31:15 | |
| And there is a 56 acre parcel that is owned. The bulk of it is zoned commercial. | 01:31:19 | |
| All right, so we have the idea. | 01:31:30 | |
| When that R5 was resolved, R5. | 01:31:34 | |
| But originally it was. | 01:31:42 | |
| Not at the. | 01:31:44 | |
| Not the top of my head. | 01:31:45 | |
| Yeah, not at the top of my head. | 01:31:47 | |
| All right, so are there. | 01:31:52 | |
| Further questions that the Commission wants to talk about. Do we have questions for the city? | 01:31:55 | |
| Are we ready to look at each one of these request items? | 01:32:00 | |
| I have. No, I don't think we have to look at each other. I've got some questions. OK, go, go ahead 1. | 01:32:06 | |
| You're trying to get more density in your. | 01:32:12 | |
| I don't disagree with that. Right now our one property. | 01:32:16 | |
| Requires a 10,000 square foot lot. | 01:32:21 | |
| So by reducing the lot size, you get more density. | 01:32:25 | |
| I understand that I have no problem with that. | 01:32:29 | |
| I do have a problem with 50 foot wide. | 01:32:31 | |
| Very serious problem. | 01:32:34 | |
| I I can go as low as. | 01:32:37 | |
| I can agree with Lord of 60 foot wildlife. | 01:32:38 | |
| I don't like 5 foot setbacks. | 01:32:41 | |
| I want much set back as I can. | 01:32:44 | |
| A 20 foot set back on the front. | 01:32:46 | |
| Is not good. | 01:32:49 | |
| Because that won't fit a status. | 01:32:51 | |
| Well, true, true. | 01:32:53 | |
| Pickup truck with a trailer hitch. | 01:32:56 | |
| That will fill up a 20 foot set back. | 01:32:58 | |
| In driveway. | 01:33:01 | |
| And this is this is so muffled. So that's so many as I'm giving you. | 01:33:03 | |
| Right up front. | 01:33:08 | |
| On my opinion. | 01:33:10 | |
| Now anybody? | 01:33:12 | |
| I'm ready, OK. | 01:33:16 | |
| Any other comments? | 01:33:20 | |
| All right, so we have 4 rezonings that we need to. | 01:33:23 | |
| Deal with individually. | 01:33:29 | |
| So we're going to then. | 01:33:31 | |
| Look at item number 2, which is a rezoning of parcel 121021. | 01:33:34 | |
| And this is going from a commercial to an R1. | 01:33:41 | |
| Do we have a motion for this item? | 01:33:46 | |
| I'll make a motion to approve it. | 01:33:51 | |
| Right. Do we have a second? | 01:33:53 | |
| I'll second. | 01:33:55 | |
| All those in favor, aye. | 01:33:56 | |
| All right, so that was item 2. Item 3 is again a rezoning. In this case, it's parcel 121. | 01:33:59 | |
| 021B. | 01:34:08 | |
| And this is. | 01:34:10 | |
| From a planned development C2. | 01:34:11 | |
| To an R5. | 01:34:15 | |
| Any discussion? Are we ready for a motion on this item? | 01:34:19 | |
| I'll make the motion. | 01:34:24 | |
| Right. Do we have a second? | 01:34:26 | |
| All right, all those in favor. | 01:34:27 | |
| Aye, all right, that motion carries. | 01:34:30 | |
| Item number 4 again is a rezoning. This is 121021 C and this is going from AC to. | 01:34:33 | |
| Zoning to an R1 zoning. | 01:34:42 | |
| Any discussion or do we have a motion on this item? | 01:34:45 | |
| I'll make a motion to approve. | 01:34:48 | |
| Right second. Second. | 01:34:51 | |
| All those in favor, aye aye. | 01:34:53 | |
| All right, and that leaves us then? | 01:34:56 | |
| Our last rezoning on this item 5. | 01:34:59 | |
| This is for parcel 134029 and this is going from an R. | 01:35:02 | |
| Five to an R1. | 01:35:08 | |
| Do we have a motion? I'll make a motion. | 01:35:11 | |
| All right, second, second. All right. All those in favor. Aye, aye. | 01:35:14 | |
| All right, So those were the rezoning items. And then lastly. | 01:35:19 | |
| We have a request to approve the conceptual. | 01:35:25 | |
| That was provided to us for this subdivision, which includes all of the. | 01:35:29 | |
| Parcels totaling 162. | 01:35:36 | |
| 2 1/2 acres that we just have taken action on rezoning. | 01:35:38 | |
| The proposal includes up to 325. | 01:35:44 | |
| Residential lots. | 01:35:48 | |
| Under the proposed R1 and then we have an R5. | 01:35:50 | |
| Section of this. | 01:35:54 | |
| Property, and again, this is an approval of the conceptual plan. | 01:35:56 | |
| To allow them. | 01:36:01 | |
| To move forward. | 01:36:03 | |
| On this. | 01:36:05 | |
| Do we have a motion on this item? | 01:36:07 | |
| Move to approve. | 01:36:11 | |
| All right, a second. | 01:36:12 | |
| I'll second. | 01:36:15 | |
| All right. | 01:36:17 | |
| Can we please review conditions? Conditions of approach? Yep. | 01:36:20 | |
| Would you like me to take a crack at that? | 01:36:28 | |
| OK, a couple of things that we discussed. | 01:36:33 | |
| Let's start with. | 01:36:39 | |
| A traffic study. | 01:36:42 | |
| A traffic study will be conducted. | 01:36:44 | |
| Prior to the submission of the preliminary plat. | 01:36:48 | |
| And. | 01:36:55 | |
| Recording into the record. | 01:36:56 | |
| Speaking to you and and writing. | 01:36:59 | |
| That's a lot of things to do. | 01:37:02 | |
| A letter of intent. | 01:37:07 | |
| From Georgia dot for. | 01:37:09 | |
| Discussions of a secondary axis. | 01:37:13 | |
| Moving forward, all of the requirements of the preliminary plan will be put forward. | 01:37:33 | |
| This entails. | 01:37:38 | |
| A more detailed landscape plan. | 01:37:41 | |
| I think it would behoove the applicant to. | 01:37:43 | |
| Detail the buffer. | 01:37:46 | |
| Between the sugar mill property and adjacent to. | 01:37:48 | |
| The railway as well as the buffer along Saint Mary's Road. | 01:37:52 | |
| Mr. White, you had mentioned the environmental assessment. | 01:38:10 | |
| As well as the archaeological assessment. | 01:38:15 | |
| If possible, I think that the results of that. | 01:38:18 | |
| Could be shared with the Commission. | 01:38:21 | |
| Staff. | 01:38:35 | |
| Staff will working with the applicant. | 01:38:40 | |
| Review the parking requirements. | 01:38:43 | |
| And try to. | 01:38:47 | |
| Perhaps find additional parking. | 01:38:50 | |
| If. | 01:38:53 | |
| The review should warrant that. | 01:38:54 | |
| That would be part of your standard process, yes. | 01:38:59 | |
| Well. | 01:39:04 | |
| What I can divulge is that the development meets the parking standards. | 01:39:07 | |
| I think the parking standards are where we have challenges. | 01:39:11 | |
| So that will be a collaborative. | 01:39:14 | |
| Discussion if room can be found. | 01:39:17 | |
| Perhaps through? | 01:39:20 | |
| Having some influence on the restrictions and covenants, we can discuss that. | 01:39:24 | |
| The ownership of the roadways there's, I think there's a lot of opportunities there to. | 01:39:30 | |
| Avoid what some of our. | 01:39:36 | |
| Current developments are challenged by with. | 01:39:38 | |
| On street parking. | 01:39:41 | |
| I talked too much on that one so I kind of forgot what I said, but I'm just going to hungry. | 01:39:44 | |
| What's the city analysis of thank you parking parking allocation for? | 01:39:50 | |
| Solutions. | 01:39:56 | |
| As is stated in the preliminary plat application. | 01:40:07 | |
| Part of that is that you will. | 01:40:11 | |
| Provide more detail on your. | 01:40:13 | |
| Open space, Amenity. Recreation space. | 01:40:17 | |
| OK. | 01:40:20 | |
| Last thing that I'll suggest it is. | 01:40:31 | |
| Mr. King. | 01:40:35 | |
| Embedded. | 01:40:36 | |
| The. | 01:40:38 | |
| Meet with the school board. | 01:40:39 | |
| About so I'd like to I'd like to go a little bit beyond the scope of this Commission and just let. | 01:40:41 | |
| Community members know because this is not. | 01:40:48 | |
| This is something that we hear at all of our schools. | 01:40:52 | |
| And they're they're in the old subdivision ordinance there was. | 01:40:56 | |
| As we discussed earlier in the meeting. | 01:41:01 | |
| There was kind of this idea of a footpath. | 01:41:03 | |
| Or some sort of walkway or connection for school aged children. | 01:41:06 | |
| To the school. | 01:41:11 | |
| We've seen that in the Cannon Forest development. We've seen it in the Davis. | 01:41:13 | |
| St. Townhomes that we recently put through. | 01:41:17 | |
| It is up to the school board, which is a county. | 01:41:20 | |
| School board, right? That's not a municipal, it's county. | 01:41:24 | |
| So they have their own set of operating practices. | 01:41:27 | |
| It is up to the school board as to whether or not they want to entertain that connection. | 01:41:30 | |
| As Mr. White said. | 01:41:34 | |
| You would be open to us, you know, reaching out and sharing that. | 01:41:36 | |
| And we're happy to do that and can have that as a. | 01:41:40 | |
| Condition of approval. | 01:41:43 | |
| But I do want to say that the school board is currently working with both the city of all cities, Kingsland, Woodbine and Saint | 01:41:45 | |
| Mary's. | 01:41:49 | |
| To discuss redistricting. | 01:41:54 | |
| Of the school zones. | 01:41:56 | |
| So it is not a given that the children who may be moving into this future development would go to Mary Lee Clark. | 01:41:58 | |
| So I think if if that is something that. | 01:42:06 | |
| Community members are very concerned about. | 01:42:09 | |
| I encourage you to not just engage in our processes, but also in the school board's discussions. | 01:42:14 | |
| OK. | 01:42:24 | |
| Jamie, are you including a second entrance into your? | 01:42:30 | |
| Suggestions. By default I think the traffic study and this letter of intent from Georgia dot for that secondary entrance. | 01:42:33 | |
| Would yield some next steps there. | 01:42:43 | |
| Yeah. | 01:42:48 | |
| All right, so you were. | 01:42:50 | |
| Did I get him special conditions? Have you completed that? | 01:42:53 | |
| Oh yeah, I got one more. | 01:42:59 | |
| I think. | 01:43:02 | |
| Something that we've talked about. | 01:43:04 | |
| In the new subdivision ordinance and that Mister King. | 01:43:06 | |
| Alluded to and I'll bring your attention to this kind of. | 01:43:09 | |
| Preliminary lot landscaping plan. | 01:43:13 | |
| I'd also like the applicant to. | 01:43:17 | |
| Create a bit of a lot key here at the preliminary plat. | 01:43:20 | |
| Scale to show. | 01:43:24 | |
| What is the front yard set back? What is the side yard set back? You know what kind of space? | 01:43:26 | |
| Would be on the on the typical unit. So Mr. King, you'll get. | 01:43:31 | |
| A better sense for. | 01:43:36 | |
| The setbacks that come with the 50 foot. | 01:43:40 | |
| White blood, and I believe that. | 01:43:42 | |
| Wraps up. | 01:43:46 | |
| Yes, OK. | 01:43:55 | |
| So I believe we have a motion. | 01:43:57 | |
| On the table, but we're seeking a second. | 01:44:01 | |
| Before we paused to. | 01:44:05 | |
| Define what the special conditions on that? So can we have a repeat on our? | 01:44:08 | |
| Motion on this one. OK, I move to approve with staff requirements. | 01:44:13 | |
| All right, do we have a second? | 01:44:19 | |
| All right, all those in favor. | 01:44:21 | |
| Aye, all right. | 01:44:24 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:44:26 | |
| All right. So because we amended the agenda and removed the last two items, that covers the items on tonight's agenda. | 01:44:29 | |
| Jamie, do we have any other discussion items or? | 01:44:41 | |
| Things that need to be covered before we adjourn. No, just separate from the Planning Commission this Thursday, the city will be. | 01:44:44 | |
| Hosting a. | 01:44:53 | |
| A development progress report at 5:00 PM here in Council Chambers. | 01:44:56 | |
| Where we'll be discussing the findings of the Midtown RSVP planning process that the. | 01:45:01 | |
| University of Georgia. | 01:45:09 | |
| Has completed. | 01:45:10 | |
| And then at 6:00 PM, there will be a town hall. So feel free to come and. | 01:45:11 | |
| And. | 01:45:16 | |
| Communicate with the Council. | 01:45:18 | |
| And also at the July 21st Council meeting. | 01:45:20 | |
| I'll be leading a working session on blight. | 01:45:25 | |
| And future approaches to blight in the city. | 01:45:29 | |
| And that will be at 5:00 PM. | 01:45:33 | |
| All right. So with that, do we have a motion to adjourn? | 01:45:37 | |
| All right, do we have a second? | 01:45:42 | |
| All those in favor. | 01:45:44 | |
| Session stands adjourned. | 01:45:46 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 01:45:55 |